International network for natural sciences – research journal
  • mendeley icon
  • linkedin icon
  • google plus icon
  • twitter icon
  • google scholar icon
  • facebook icon

Assessment of the quality of wool from different sheep breeds of Pakistan

By: Faisal Ashfaq, Muhammad Fatah Ullah Khan, Muhammad Iqbal Anjum, Munib Hussain, Javed Iqbal, Agha Waqar Yunus, Munir Hussain Khan

Key Words: Quality, Pakistan, Sheep, Wool

Int. J. Biosci. 16(1), 272-278, January 2020.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/16.1.272-278

Certification: ijb 2020 0005 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

The present study was conducted in Pakistan to determine the wool characteristics of important sheep breeds and Rambouillet crossbreds in the country. In total, 4733 wool samples from 22 sheep breeds, and three crossbreds were analyzed. The clean wool yield was maximum (P < 0.05) in case of Kail, Pahari, Kairi, and Chitrali while lowest (P < 0.01) in case of Harnai, Khadali, Sipli and Manghali. The maximum (P < 0.05) fiber dimeter noted was 37.7µm in Lohi and Kajli, while the lowest (P < 0.001) fiber diameter noted was 20.1µm in Rambouillet. The second lowest (P < 0.001) fiber diameter was 23.0 and 23.7µm in Kairi and Chitrali breeds, respectively. The lowest (P ≤ 0.01) medullation noted in local breeds was 5.9%, in case of Kairi. The highest (P < 0.001) medullation was found to be 60.9% in Manghali breed. The shortest (P < 0.01) staple noted was 2.71cm in Pahari, while the longest (P < 0.001) staple was found to be 14.1cm in Harnai breed. Comparison of crossbreds with Rambouillet rams indicated that two consecutive crosses with Rambouillet were necessary to bring the wool quality of Kaghani sheep at par with Rambouillet. Present results highlighted Kairi and Chitrali breeds to have lesser bulk than Rambouillet. The values of fiber diameter of these two breeds, and medullation in wool from Kairi were closer to Rambouillet, making these a preferred target for further research on fine wool in the country.

| Views 46 |

| Views 46 |

Assessment of the quality of wool from different sheep breeds of Pakistan

Ahmad S, Khan MS, Khan MFU. 2010. Factors affecting wool characteristics of Kari sheep in Pakistan. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 34, 485-492.

Akraim F, Milad IS, Abdulkarim AA, Ganem M. 2008. Wool characteristics of Libyan Barbary sheep in North-Eastern Libya: 1. Fiber Diameter and Staple Length. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 20, Article # 118.

Anonymous. 2017. Economic Survey of Pakistan 2016-17. Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan.

Arnold GW, Charlick AJ, Eley JR. 1984. Effects of shearing time and time of lambing on wool growth and processing characteristics. Australian Jouranl of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry  24, 337-343.

Crawshaw G. 1990. High-tech measurement of wool medullation. Wool Rec. 149, 27-29.

Devendran P, Kandasamy N, Panneerselvam S. 2008. Fleece production and wool quality characteristics of Coimbatore sheep. Indian Journal of Animal Science 78, 419-421.

Edriss MA, Dashab G, Ghare Aghaji AA, Nilforooshan MA, Movasagh H. 2007. A study on some physical attributes of Naeni sheep wool for Textile Industry. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 10, 415-420.

Farmanullah, Khan MFU, Khan MH, Jamal SM. 2019. Factors affecting mean fiber diameter in selected Pakistani sheep breeds/crosses. Journal of Natural Fibers.

DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2019.1658259

Gouri D, Lateef M, Mustafa MI, Muhammad G, Bashir MK. 2014. Wool characterization of sheep breeds in different ecological zones. Nature and Science 12, 81-88.

Isani GB and Baloch MN. 1996. Sheep and goat breeds of Pakistan. Press Corporation of Pakistan, Karachi.

Khan MF, Ahmad W, Khan MA. 1994. Study of some important characteristics of wool from certain well known sheep breeds in Pakistan. In Proceedings of International Seminar on Small Ruminant, Islamabad, Pakistan, p. 97-103.

Lupton CJ, Freking BA, Leymaster KA. 2004. Evaluation of Dorset, Finn sheep, Romanov, Texel and Montadale breeds of sheep: Wool Characteristics of F1 ewes. Journal of Animal Science 82, 2293-2300.

Munir M, Shah NA, Aujla KM. 2010. Production of wool and hair in highland Balochistan, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Veterinary Science 26, 75-87.

Qureshi MN, Khan SA, Shafique M, Sabir N, Ahmed G. 2013. Influence of genetic and non-genetic factors on quantity and quality of wool from sheep reared at Rawalkot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Journal of Animal and Plant Science 23, 20-25.

Ross DA, Wickham GA, Elliott KH. 1980. Breeding objectives to improve wool used in carpets. In Proceedings of the 1st World Congress on Sheep and Beef Cattle Breeding 1, 37-45.

Shah SMA. 1982. Utilization of Pakistani wool in carpet industry. In Proceedings of International Seminar on Sheep and Wool, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, Islamabad. p. 101-113.

Siddiqi KA. 1982. Marketing and grading of wool in Pakistan. In Proceedings of International Seminar on Sheep and Wool, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, Islamabad. p. 114-136.

Sumner R, Baxter BP, Upsdell MP, Neimaur K. 2009. Prediction of core bulk using OFDA instruments. International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science Vol. 57(1).

Zubair M, Habib G, Ahmad N. 2006. Comparative study on wool quality in sheep reared at Livestock Research Station Jaba and Lalazar alpine pasture. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 5, 641-646.

Faisal Ashfaq, Muhammad Fatah Ullah Khan, Muhammad Iqbal Anjum, Munib Hussain, Javed Iqbal, Agha Waqar Yunus, Munir Hussain Khan.
Assessment of the quality of wool from different sheep breeds of Pakistan.
Int. J. Biosci. 16(1), 272-278, January 2020.
https://innspub.net/ijb/assessment-quality-wool-different-sheep-breeds-pakistan/
Copyright © 2019
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
https://innspub.net
brand
innspub logo
english language editing
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Publish Your Article
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Submit Your Article
INNSPUB on FB
Email Update