International network for natural sciences – research journal
  • mendeley icon
  • linkedin icon
  • google plus icon
  • twitter icon
  • google scholar icon
  • facebook icon

Development and testing of power operated Interculture implements for poor and small farmers of Pakistan

By: Muhammad Kazim Nawaz, Zia-Ul-Haq, Sohail Raza Haidree, Hamza Muneer Asam, Talha Mehmood, Abdul Qadeer

Key Words: Interculture, Cotton, Grapevine

Int. J. Biosci. 15(2), 586-594, August 2019.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/15.2.586-594

Certification: ijb 2019 0011 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

In Pakistan Cotton (Gossypium) is planted during “summer” season from April to June, mainly in two provinces with Punjab 75% and Sindh 25% of the total area. It is an essential oil seed and fabric cash crop, lifeline for textile and palm-oil industry of the country. However, Grapevine (Vitis) is a major fruit and in Pakistan its 70% cultivated area is in Baluchistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Pothwar region of North Punjab. Heavy weed infestation is the major cause of low productivity in cotton and grapevine. To improve yield effective weed control is vital, as weeds are the most efficient users of space, sunlight, water and nutrients due to their fast growth habits. Excessive use of pre and post emergence herbicides degrading air, water, soil environment and quality of produce. To protect environment power operated intercultural-implements with different shape of blade were developed at Malik Engineering Workshop Dhudial-Chakwal with collaboration with Faculty of Agricultural Engineering & Technology, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi during 2018-19. Machine performance was tested under local condition of Punjab at two sites. For grapevine at Site-A: University Research Farm Koont-Chakwal PMAS-AAUR and for cotton at Site-B: Maher-Rab-Nawaz-Sial Agriculture Farm, Mukhiana tehsil and district Jhang. The intercultural machine was tested for weeding efficiency, plant damage, speed, depth, theoretical field capacity, effective field capacity, field efficiency, fuel consumption and operational cost. Performance of the indigenously fabricated machine blades were compared with the available rotary weeder. The data collected to experimentation was statistically analyzed at 5% level of Probability.

| Views 42 |

| Views 42 |

Development and testing of power operated Interculture implements for poor and small farmers of Pakistan

Aristilde L, Reed ML, Wilkes RA, Youngster T, Kukurugya MA, Katz V, Sasaki CR. 2017. Glyphosate-induced specific and widespread perturbations in the metabolome of soil Pseudomonas species. Frontiers in Environmental Science 5, 34.

Bean C. 2019. Pakistan Cotton and Products Annual Cotton and Products Annual USDA Foreign Agriculture Service. Globle Agriculture information network.

Chavan M, Sachin C, Ashutosh R, Piyush S, Digvijay M. 2015. Design and development of weed removal implement. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology 3(5), 526-532.

Dhruwe NK. 2018. Development of self propelled rotary tiller cum inters row weeder. Trends in Biosciences 11(5), 694-697.

Goel AK, Behera D, Behera BK, Mohanty SK, Nanda SK. 2008. Development and ergonomic evaluation of manually operated weeder for dry land crops. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal.

Hegazy RA, Abdelmotaleb IA, Imara ZM, Okasha MH. 2014. Development and evaluation of small–scale power weeder. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 31(3), 703-728.

Hunt SD, Morgan RM. 1995. The comparative advantage theory of competition. Journal of marketing 59(2), 1-15.

Hussain S, Shah M, Abbas M, Waqar Ullah, Imtiaz M, Ali M, Islam B, Said F, Jalal F. 2019. Pheno-Physiological Assessment of Grapes (Vitis vinifera) Germplasm Department of Agriculture, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, KPK, Pakistan.

Islam AS, Islam MT, Islam MS, Rahman AL, Rahman MA. 2017. Performance Evaluation of BRRI Power Weeder for Low Land Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivation. The Agriculturists 15(1), 40-48.

Jeevarathinam A, Velmurugan C. 2014. Design Modification and Analysis of Rotavator Blade, Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering pp. 43-50.

Karnkal US. 2013. Design and development of self-propelled weeder for field crops. International Journal of Agricultural Engineering 6, 304-310.

Kepner RA, Bainer R, Barger EI. 2005. Principal of Farm Machinery. Pub. John Wiley and Sons, N.Y, U.S.A. pp.32-38.

Kishore Kumar G, Raj Kiran B, Ch Murali Krishna. 2018. Performance and Evaluation of Power Weeder, Wheel Hoe, Star Weeder under Dryland Conditions.

Mandal SK, Bhattachary B. 2013. Proceedings of the 1st International and 16th National Conference on Implements and Mechanisms, IIT Roorkee, India  (5), 595-607.

Manjunatha K, Anantachar M, Prakash KV, Desai BK, Vijayakumar P. 2016. Development and evaluation of tractor operated rotary weeder. Environment and Ecology 34(4), 1643-1648.

Mukhtar H, Ndiaye M, Philippe C, Ahmad N. 2011. The grape antioxidant resveratrol for skin disorders: promise, prospects, and challenges. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics 508(2), 164-170.

Patange GS, Thokale PJ, Deshmukh VD. 2015. Performance evaluation of self-propelled rotary weeder. International journal of Agricultural Engineering 8(1), 70-74.

Rajashekar M, Heblikar VK, Mohan Kumar S. 2014. Simulation and analyze low cost weeder. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology 3(3), 543-549.

Rana SS, Rana MC. 2016. Principles and Practices of Weed Management. Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, 138, row weeder. International Journal on Emerging Technologies 6(1), 125-129.

Remesan R, Roopesh MS, Remya N, Preman PS. 2007. Wet land paddy weeding-A comprehensive comparative study from south India.

Sial KB, Kalhoro AD, Ahsan MZ, Mojidano MS, Soomro AW, Hashmi RQ, Keerio A. 2014. Performance of Different Upland Cotton Varieties under the Climatic Condition of Central Zone of Sindh. American-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci 14, 1447-1449.

Tewari VK, Chandel NS, Vidhu KP, Tripathi H. 2014. Performance Evaluation and Scope of Adoption of Rotary Power Weeder in Vegetable Crops. Agricultural Engineering Today 38(3), 10-14.

Thorat Deepak S, Shoo PK, Dipankar De, Mir Asif Iquebal. 2014. Design and Development of Ridge Profile Power Weeder. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 51(4).

Muhammad Kazim Nawaz, Zia-Ul-Haq, Sohail Raza Haidree, Hamza Muneer Asam, Talha Mehmood, Abdul Qadeer.
Development and testing of power operated Interculture implements for poor and small farmers of Pakistan.
Int. J. Biosci. 15(2), 586-594, August 2019.
https://innspub.net/ijb/development-testing-power-operated-interculture-implements-poor-small-farmers-pakistan/
Copyright © 2019
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
https://innspub.net
brand
innspub logo
english language editing
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Publish Your Article
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Submit Your Article
INNSPUB on FB
Email Update