International network for natural sciences – research journal
  • mendeley icon
  • linkedin icon
  • google plus icon
  • twitter icon
  • google scholar icon
  • facebook icon

Growth and morphological responses of Andrographis paniculata to varying shade and nitrogen fertilization

By: Khairul Azree Rosli, Siti Aishah Hassan, Mahmud Tengku Muda Mohamed, Johnson Stanslas, Rosmah Murdad, Shahida Mohd Sharif, Izyan Ayuni Mohamad Selamat, Mohammad Mohd Lassim

Key Words: Shade, nitrogen, Andrographis paniculata, Growth

Int. J. Biosci. 12(1), 386-402, January 2018.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/12.1.386-402

Certification: ijb 2018 0222 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Nees is a traditional medicinal plant with valuable phytochemical and pharmacological potential. Growth and morphological responses to light and N can be useful measurements to determine favorable growing conditions for A. paniculata. Despite numerous findings on other medicinal and aromatic plants, there is little information about how light and N affect growth and morphology A. paniculata. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of shade and N on growth and morphological responses of A. paniculata. Plants were grown under two shade levels, 0% and 40%, and fertilized with five N rates, 90, 135, 180, 225 and 270kg ha-1 in a nested design. Shaded plants grew taller with greater total leaf area, specific leaf area, leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate than sun-grown plants. Fertilizing plants with increasing rate of N has increased their height, leaf area index, total leaf area, shoot and root dry mass, leaf mass ratio and root shoot ratio. There was a quadratic relationship between N rate and total dry mass of plants. The goal in commercial A. paniculata cultivation is to produce high yielding high quality plants. Results showed that A. paniculata could adapt to varying levels of shade and N by altering its growth and morphology. Shading at 40% and fertilizing with 225kg N ha-1 can increase growth and yield of A. paniculata.

| Views 78 |

Growth and morphological responses of Andrographis paniculata to varying shade and nitrogen fertilization

Abdalla JA. 2005. Genetic variation and anticancer activity of Andrographis paniculata germplasm from Malaysia [thesis]. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Aerts R, Chapin FS. 1999. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Advances in ecological research (30), 1-67.

Ambarwati R. 2008. Kajian dosis pupuk urea dan macam media tanam terhadap hasil kandungan andrographolide tanaman sambiloto [thesis]. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Beadle CL. 1997. Dynamics of leaf and canopy development. In: Nambiar EKS, Brown AG, editors. Management of soil, nutrients and water in tropical plantation forests. Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) 169-212p.

Bjorn LO. 2008. Photobiology the science of life and light. New York: Springer 684p.

Breda NJJ. 2003. Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies. Journal of Experimental Botany 54(392), 2403-2417.

Bou-Torrent J, Roig-Villanova I, Martinez-Garcia JF. 2008. Light signaling: back to space. Trends in Plant Science 13(3), 108-114.

Briskin DP. 2000. Medicinal plants and phytomedicines. Linking plant biochemistry and physiology to human health. Plant Physiology 124(2), 507-514.

Briskin DP, Gawienowski MC. 2001. Differential effects of light and nitrogen on production of hypericins and leaf glands in Hypericum perforatum. Plant Physiol. Biochem 39(12), 1075-1081.

Casey CA, Mangan FX, Herbert SJ, Barker AV, Carter AK. 2004. The effect of light intensity and nitrogen fertilization on plant growth and leaf quality of ngo gai (Eryngium foetidum L.) in Massachusetts. In 26th International Horticultural Congress the Future for Medicinal and Aromatic Plants: proceedings: 2004 Aug 11-12; Craker LE, Simon JE, Jatisatienr A, Lewinsohn E (Eds.): Toronto p.215-229.

Cao KF, Ohkubo T. 1998. Allometry, root/shoot ratio and root architecture in understory saplings of deciduous dicotyledonous trees in central Japan. Ecological Research 13(2), 217-227.

Chauhan SK, Tiwari G, Gangrade SK, Tripathi NK. 2002. Influence of nitrogen application levels through different sources on andrographolide content in kalmegh [Andrographis paniculata (Burn. f) Wall.ex Nees]. In Govil JN, Pandey J, Shivakumar BG, Singh VK, editors. Recent Progress in Medicinal Plants Vol. 5 Crop Improvement, Production Technology, Trade and Commerce. Houston (TX): Sci Tech Publishing p. 121-124.

Chauhan JS, Tomar YK, Singh NI, Ali S, Badoni A, Debarati, Rana A. 2009. Assessment of compatible substratum for Andrographis paniculata standard seed germination testing. Journal of American Science 5(6), 70-75.

Chen CM. 2004. Effects of different nitrogen fertilizers and application rates on the growth and physiological-nutrition of Andrographis paniculata and Artemisia indica [thesis]. Taipei: National Taiwan University.

Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Diaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE, Reich PB, ter Steege TH, Morgan HD, van der Heijden MGA, Pausas JG, Poorter H. 2003. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany 51(4), 335-380.

Elberse IAM, van Damme JMM, van Tienderen PH. 2003. Plasticity of growth characteristics in wild barley (Hordeum  spontaneum) in response to nutrient limitation. British Ecological Society 91(3), 371-382.

Ehsanipour A, Razmjoo J, Zeinali H. 2012. Effect of nitrogen rates on yield and quality of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) accessions. Industrial Crops and Products 35(1), 121-125.

Falster DS, Westoby M. 2003. Plant height and evolutionary games. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18(7), 337-343.

Farley RA, Fitter AH. 1999. Temporal and spatial variation in soil resources in a deciduous woodland. Journal of Ecology 87(4), 688-696.

Food and Agriculture Organization. 2005. Trade in Medicinal Plants. Rome FAO.

Franklin KA, Whitelam GC. 2005. Phytochromes and shade-avoidance responses in plants. Annals of Botany 96(2), 169-175.

Friml J. 2003. Auxin transport – shaping the plant. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 6(1), 7-12.

Gagare KC, Mate SN. 2009. Seed dormancy and germination studies in some medicinal plant species. Annals of Plant Physiology 23(2), 185-188.

Heady HF. 1957. The measurement and value of plant height in the study of herbaceous vegetation. Ecology 38(2), 313-320.

Hermans C, Hammond JP, White PJ, Verbruggen N. 2006. How do plants respond to nutrient shortage by biomass allocation? Trends in plant science 11(12), 610-617.

Hunt R. 1982. Statistical checklist 4 plant growth analysis. Suffolk: Lavenham Press Limited 7p.

Hunt R. 1991. Plant growth curves the functional approach to plant growth analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 260p.

Hunt R. 2003. Growth analysis, individual plants. In Thomas B, Murphy DJ, editors. Encyclopaedia of Applied Plant Sciences. London: Academic Press p. 579-88.

Gedroc JJ, Mc Connaughay KDM, Coleman JS. 1996. Plasticity in root/shoot partitioning: optimal, ontogenetic, or both? Functional Ecology 10(1), 44-50.

Gonzalez N, Vanhaeren H, Inzé D. 2012. Leaf size control: complex coordination of cell division and expansion. Trends in plant science 17(6), 332-340.

Gratani L. 2014. Plant phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental factors. Advances in botany.

Jansen C, Kempen MMLV, Bogemann GM, Bouma TJ, Kroon HD. 2006. Limited costs of wrong root placement in Rumex palustris in heterogeneous soils. New Phytologist 171(1), 117-126.

Khatun MA, Harun-Or-Rashid M, Rahmatullah M. 2011. Scientific validation of eight medicinal plants used in traditional medicinal systems of Malaysia: a review. American-Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 5(1), 67-75.

Kiba T, Kudo T, Kojima M, Sakakibara H. 2011. Hormonal control of nitrogen acquisition: roles of auxin, abscisic acid, and cytokinin. Journal of Experimental Botany 62(4),1399-1409.

Knops JM., Reinhart K. 2000. Specific leaf area along a nitrogen fertilization gradient. The American Midland Naturalist 144(2), 265-272.

Kobe RK, Iyer M, Walters MB. 2010. Optimal partitioning theory revisited: nonstructural carbohydrates dominate root mass responses to nitrogen. Ecology 91(1), 166-179.

Kozuka T, Kobayashi J, Horiguchi G, Demura T, Sakakibara H, Tsukaya H, Nagatani A. 2010. Involvement of auxin and brassinosteroid in the regulation of petiole elongation under the shade. Plant Physiology 153(4), 1608-1618.

Lambers H, Poorter H. 1992. Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes andecological consequences. Advances in ecological research (23), 187-261.

Levins R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Lodge DJ, McDowell WH, Mc Swiney CP. 1994. The importance of nutrient pulses in tropical forests. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 9(10), 384-387.

Lopez-Bucio J, Cruz-Ramirez A, Herrera-Estrella L. 2003. The role of nutrient availability in regulating root architecture. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 6(3), 280-287.

Maathuis FJM, Filatov V, Herzyk P, Krijger GC, Axelsen KB, Chen S, Green BJ, Li Y, Madagan KL, Sanchez-Fernandez R, Forde BG, Palmgren MG, Rea PA, Williams LE, Sanders D, Amtmann A. 2003. Transcriptome analysis of root transporters reveals participation of multiple gene families in the response to cation stress. The Plant Journal 35(6), 675-692.

Mishra S, Jain A. 2013. Effect of integrated nutrient management on andrographolide content of Andrographis paniculata. Nature and Science 11(8), 30-32.

Mc Carthy MC, Enquist, BJ. 2007. Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation. Functional Ecology 21(4), 713-720.

Ruberti I, Sessa G, Ciolfi A, Possenti M, Carabelli M, Morelli G. 2012. Plant adaptation to dynamically changing environment: the shade avoidance response. Biotechnology Advances 30(5), 1047-1058.

Malone S, Herbert AJ, Holshouser DL. 2002. Evaluation of the LAI-2000 plant canopy analyzer to estimate leaf area in manually defoliated soybean. Agron. J. 94(5),1012-1019.

Moles AT, Warton DI, Warman L, Swenson NG, Laffan SW, Zanne AE, Pitman A, Hemmings FA, Leishman MR. 2009. Global patterns in plant height. Journal of Ecology 97(5), 923-932.

Morelli G, Ruberti I. 2002. Light and shade in the photocontrol of Arabidopsis growth. Trends in Plant Science 7(9), 399-404.

Palaniswamy UR. 2005. Effect of light intensity on the pigment composition and oxalic acid concentrations in kalmegh (Andrographis paniculata) leaf. In WOCMAP III: proceedings 2005 Feb 3-7; Chiang Mai: ISHS p.25-30.

Parvin S. 2007. Response of kalmegh (Andrographis paniculata) to nitrogen [thesis]. Gazipur: Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University.

Paul MJ, Driscoll SP. 1997. Sugar repression of photosynthesis: the role of carbohydrates in signaling nitrogen deficiency through sink: source imbalance. Plant, Cell and Environment 20(1), 110-116.

Perez-Harguindeguy N, Diaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P, Bret-Harte MS, Cornwell WK, Craine JM, Gurvich DE, Urcelay C, Veneklaas EJ, Reich PB, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Ray P, Enrico L, Pausas JG, de Vos AC, Buchmann N, Funes G, Quetier F, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, Morgan HD, ter Steege H, van der Heijden MGA, Sack L, Blonder B, Poschlod P, Vaieretti MV, Conti G, Staver AC, Aquino S, Cornelissen JHC. 2013. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany 61(3), 167-234.

Pigliucci M. 1997. Ontogenetic phenotypic plasticity during the reproductive phase in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 84(7), 887-887.

Pigliucci M. 2005. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20(9), 481-486.

Pitono J, Januwati M, Ngadimin. 1996. Pengaruh naungan terhadap pertumbuhan dan produksi terna tanaman sambiloto. Warta Tumbuhan Obat Indonesia 3(1), 39-40.

Prathanturarug S, Soonthornchareonnon N, Chuakul W, Saralamp P. 2007. Variation in growth and diterpene lactones among field-cultivated Andrographis paniculata. Journal of Natural Medicines 61(2), 159-163.

Poorter H. 1989. Plant growth analysis: towards a synthesis of the classical and the functional approach. Physiologia Plantarum 75(2), 237-244.

Poorter H, Evans JR. 1998. Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of species that differ inherently in specific leaf area. Oecologia 116(1-2), 26-37.

Poorter H, Nagel O. 2000. The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27(6), 595-507.

Poorter H, Nagel O. 2000. The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27(6), 595-507.

Ramesh G, Shivanna MB, Ram SA. 2005. Interactive influence of organic manures and inorganic fertilizers on growth and yield of kalmegh (Andrographis paniculata Nees.). International Research Journal of Plant Science 2(1), 16-21.

Ramlan AA, Mohamad RS, Sivakumar K, Chwan DYF. 2005. Engineering aspects of herbal and phytochemical processing: a Malaysian perspective. Jurutera 12, 10-19.

Reuter D, Robinson JB. 1997. Plant Analysis: An Interpretation Manuals. 2nd ed. Collingwood: Csiro 450p.

Reynolds HL, D’Antonio C. 1996. The ecological significance of plasticity in root weight ratio in response to nitrogen. Plant and Soil 185(1), 75-97.

Russell G, Marshall B, Jarvis PG. 1990. Plant canopies: their growth, form and function. Cambridge University Press.

Sanjutha S, Subramaniam S, Rani IC, Maheswari J. 2008. Integrated nutrient management in Andrographis paniculata. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 4(2), 141-145.

Saraswathy S, Manavalan RSA, Subramanian S. 2004. Studies on seed germination in kalmegh (Andrographis paniculata Nees.). Madras Agric. J 91(4-6), 226-229.

Saravanan R, Krishti S, Gajbhiye NA, Maiti S. 2008. Influence of light intensity on gas exchange, herbage yield and andrographolide content in Andrographis paniculata (Nees.). Indian J. Hort 65(2), 220-225.

Singh P, Singh JS. 2004. Effect of nitrogen on growth performance of Centella asiatica and Andrographis paniculata. Journal of Tropical Medicinal Plants 5(2).

Singhal GS, Renger G, Sopory SK, Irrgang KD, Govindjee. 1999. Concepts in Photobiology Photosynthesis and Photomorphogenesis. New York: Springer 1019p.

Shipley B. 2000. Plasticity in relative growth rate and its components following a change in irradiance. Plant, Cell and Environment 23 (11), 1207-1216.

Smith H. 2000. Phytochromes and light signal perception by plants – An emerging synthesis. Nature 407(6804), 585-591.

Sotiropoulou D, Karamanos A. 2010. Field studies of nitrogen application on growth and yield of Greek oregano (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum (link) ietswaart). Industrial Crops and Products 32(3), 450-457.

Subramanian R, Asmawi MZ, Sadikun A. 2012. A bitter plant with a sweet future? A comprehensive review of an oriental medicinal plant: Andrographis paniculata. Phytochemistry Rev 11(1), 39-75.

Sultan SE. 2000. Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. Trends in Plant Science 5(12), 537-542.

Sultan SE. 2010. Plant developmental responses to the environment: ecodevo insights. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 13(1), 96-101.

Tanimoto E. 2012. Tall or short? Slender or thick? A plant strategy for regulating elongation growth of roots by low concentrations of gibberellin. Annals of Botany 110(2), 373-381

Talei D, Valdiani A, Abdullah MP, Siti AH. 2012. A rapid and effective method for dormancy breakage and germination of King of Bitters (Andrographis paniculata Nees.) seeds. Maydica 57(1), 98-105.

Terashima I, Hikosaka K. 1995. Comparative ecophysiology of leaf and canopy photosynthesis. Plant, Cell and Environment 18(10), 1111-1128.

Terashima I, Miyazawa SI, Hanba YT. 2001. Why are sun leaves thicker than shade leaves? – consideration based on analyses of CO2 diffusion in the leaf. J. Plant Res 114(1), 93-105.

Terashima I, Yano S. 2001. Separate localization of light signal perception for sun or shade type chloroplast and palisade tissue differentiation in Chenopodium album. Plant Cell Physiol 42(12), 1303-1310.

Tsukaya H. 2005. Leaf shape: genetic controls and environmental factors. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 49(5-6), 547-555.

Tiwari V, Shrivastava A, Namdeo KN, Kumar MM. 2012. Effect of sources and levels of nitrogen on physiological parameters, contents and uptake of nutrient in kalmegh. Ann. Pl. Soil Res 14(1),18-21.

Lambers H, Chapin FS, Pons TL. 2008. Plant physiological ecology. New York: Springer 605p.

Pigliucci M. 1997. Ontogenetic phenotypic plasticity during the reproductive phase in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 84(7), 887-887.

Pigliucci M. 2005. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20(9), 481-486.

Watson DJ. 1947. Comparative physiological studies in the growth of field crops. I. Variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties, and within and between years. Annals of Botany 11(41), 41-76.

Valladares F, Niinemets U. 2008. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst 39. 237-257.

Weiner J. 2004. Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 6(4), 207-215.

Whitman DW, Agrawal AA. 2009. What is phenotypic plasticity and why is it important. Phenotypic plasticity of insects: Mechanisms and consequences 1-63.

Vogelmann TC, Nishio JN, Smith WK. 1996. Leaves and light capture: light propagation and gradients of carbon fixation within leaves. Trends in Plant Science 1(2), 65-70.

Volkenburg EV. 1999. Leaf expansion–an integrating plant behaviour. Plant, Cell & Environment 22(12), 1463-1473.

Valdiani A, Kadir MA, Tan SG, Talei D, Abdullah MP, Nikzad S. 2012. Nain-e Havandi Andrographis paniculata present yesterday, absent today: a plenary review on underutilized herb of Iran’s pharmaceutical plants. Mol Biol Rep 39(5), 5409-5424.

Zaharah A, Musa Y, Wan ZWM, Salbiah H. 2001. Effect of shade on the growth of misai kucing (Orthosiphon stamineus) and hempedu bumi (Andrographis paniculata) on BRIS soil. In Seminar on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants: proceedings 2001 July 24-25; Forest Research Institute Malaysia p. 237-245.

Khairul Azree Rosli, Siti Aishah Hassan, Mahmud Tengku Muda Mohamed, Johnson Stanslas, Rosmah Murdad, Shahida Mohd Sharif, Izyan Ayuni Mohamad Selamat, Mohammad Mohd Lassim.
Growth and morphological responses of Andrographis paniculata to varying shade and nitrogen fertilization.
Int. J. Biosci. 12(1), 386-402, January 2018.
https://innspub.net/ijb/growth-morphological-responses-andrographis-paniculata-varying-shade-nitrogen-fertilization/
Copyright © 2018
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
https://innspub.net
brand
innspub logo
english language editing
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Publish Your Article
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Submit Your Article
INNSPUB on FB
Email Update