International network for natural sciences – research journal
  • mendeley icon
  • linkedin icon
  • google plus icon
  • twitter icon
  • google scholar icon
  • facebook icon

Influence of riparian vegetation on living organisms: a case study of Dharabi watershed and Kallar Kahar Regions in Pakistan

By: Dilawar Khan, Gao lushuang, Huaguo Huang, Sher Shah, Sajjad Saeed, Saleem Uddin, Muhammad Nabi, Abubakar Sadiq Ibrahim, Emad Ud Din, Muhammad Amir

Key Words: Kallar Kahar, Dharabi, Riparian vegetation, Diversity, ICARDA.

Int. J. Biosci. 14(2), 361-373, February 2019.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/14.2.361-373

Certification: ijb 2019 0006 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

This study examined the influence of riparian vegetation on living organisms in Dharabi watershed and Kallar Kahar Lake. Riparian vegetation playing a key role in the maintains of biodiversity, such as providing: strengthens stream bank, captures fine sediment, filters out pollutants, increases infiltration, utilizes excess nutrients, provides food and shelter for fish and wildlife and reduces flood damage. The results show that Riparian vegetation in the area consists of typha elephantine, Phragmites kiraka, Saccharum spontaneum. The objective of the study was to find out the influence of riparian vegetation and the role of Riparian vegetation in the water cleaning process of Dharabi watershed and Kallar Kahar Lake. 84 species reported in the study area and five plant communities recognized in the Dharabi watershed on the basis of IVI by using line transect sampling methods which are Crysopogon, Cynodon, Gymnosporea, Acacia, and Conyza. However, the top three highest IVl value plant community Schoenoplectus, Phragmites and Cynodon was identified in western of the Kallar Kahar Lake. The studies also revealed that in the recreational area there was a major contribution of garbage disposable material such as Paraffin, Plastics of soft drinks and disposable meals packages. However, in the domestic area, the waste of material and garbage were daily home used material like shopping bags, newspaper or other household things. The overall effect of the garbage on the vegetation is very significant. The study also points out that bird diversity is less in that place where the relative garbage ratio is greater.

| Views 39 |

Influence of riparian vegetation on living organisms: a case study of Dharabi watershed and Kallar Kahar Regions in Pakistan

Allan JD, Castillo MM. 2007. Stream ecology: structure and function of running watersSpringer Science & Business Media.

Allan JD, Flecker AS. 1993. Biodiversity conservation in running waters. BioScience 43, 32-43.

Arthington AH, Pusey BJ. 2003. Flow restoration and protection in Australian rivers. River research and applications 19, 377-395.

Beltrão GDBM, Medeiros ESF, Ramos RTdC. 2009. Effects of riparian vegetation on the structure of the marginal aquatic habitat and the associated fish assemblage in a tropical Brazilian reservoir. Biota Neotropica 9, 37-43.

Bolan N, Kunhikrishnan A, Thangarajan R, Kumpiene J, Park J, Makino T. 2014. Remediation of heavy metal (loid) s contaminated soils–to mobilize or to immobilize? Journal of Hazardous Materials 266, 141-166.

Bonell M, Hufschmidt MM, Gladwell JS. 2005. Hydrology and water management in the humid tropics: hydrological research issues and strategies for water managementCambridge university press.

Christensen NL, Bartuska AM, Brown JH, Carpenter S, D’Antonio C, Francis R. 1996. The report of the Ecological Society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecological applications 6, 665-691.

Council NR. 1992. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: science, technology, and public policyNational Academies Press.

Council NR. 2002. Riparian areas: functions and strategies for managementNational Academies Press.

Currie B, Milton SJ, Steenkamp J. 2009. Cost–benefit analysis of alien vegetation clearing for water yield and tourism in a mountain catchment in the Western Cape of South Africa. Ecological Economics 68, 2574-2579.

Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata ZI, Knowler DJ, Lévêque C. 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological reviews 81, 163-182.

Fan C, Chang FC, Ko CH, Sheu YS, Teng CJChang TC. 2009. Urban pollutant removal by a constructed riparian wetland before typhoon damage and after reconstruction. Ecological Engineering 35, 424-435.

Gilliam J. 1994. Riparian wetlands and water quality. Journal of environmental quality 23, 896-900.

Gregory SV, Swanson FJ, McKee WA, Cummins KW. 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. BioScience 41, 540-551.

Hrodey PJ, Sutton TM, Frimpong EA, Simon TP. 2009. Land-use impacts on watershed health and integrity in Indiana warmwater streams. The American Midland Naturalist 68, 76-95.

Jungwirth M, Muhar S, Schmutz S. 1995. The effects of recreated instream and ecotone structures on the fish fauna of an epipotamal river.  The Importance of Aquatic-Terrestrial Ecotones for Freshwater Fish. Springer 34, 195-206.

Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE. 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Canadian special publication of fisheries and aquatic sciences 106, 110-127.

Kent M, Coker P. 1992. Vegetation description andanalysis. BocaRaton, CRC.

Khan D, Saeed A, Junaid A, Qamar I, Yazdan F, Ud Din S. 2016. Assessment of riparian vegetation in Dhrabi watershed and Chakwal region in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research 29.

Khan S, Shahnaz M, Jehan N, Rehman S, Shah MT, Din I. 2013. Drinking water quality and human health risk in Charsadda district, Pakistan. Journal of cleaner production 60, 93-101.

Lake P, Bond N, Reich P. 2007. Linking ecological theory with stream restoration. Freshwater biology 52, 597-615.

Le Maitre DC, Gaertner M, Marchante E, Ens EJ, Holmes PM, Pauchard A. 2011. Impacts of invasive Australian acacias: implications for management and restoration. Diversity and Distributions 17, 1015-1029.

Lowrance R. 1998. Riparian forest ecosystems as filters for nonpoint-source pollution. Successes, limitations, and frontiers in ecosystem science. Springer 45, 113-141.

Mugodo J, Kennard M, Liston P, Nichols S, Linke S, Norris RH. 2006. Local stream habitat variables predicted from catchment scale characteristics are useful for predicting fish distribution. Hydrobiologia 572, 59-70.

Naiman RJ, Decamps H. 1997. The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annual review of Ecology and Systematics 28, 621-658.

Novotny V. 2003. Water quality: diffuse pollution and watershed managementJohn Wiley & Sons.

Palone RS, Todd AH. 1998. Chesapeake Bay riparian handbook: a guide for establishing and maintaining riparian forest buffersUS Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Area State.

Pusey BJ, Arthington AH. 2003. Importance of the riparian zone to the conservation and management of freshwater fish: a review. Marine and Freshwater Research 54, 1-16.

Richards C, Haro R, Johnson L, Host G. 1997. Catchment and reach‐scale properties as indicators of macroinvertebrate species traits. Freshwater Biology 37, 219-230.

Richardson DM, Holmes PM, Esler KJ, Galatowitsch SM, Stromberg JC, Kirkman SP, 2007. Riparian vegetation: degradation, alien plant invasions, and restoration prospects. Diversity and distributions 13, 126-139.

Sheikh AT, Month AAU, Plan BBA, Zone EEE, Rights IIP, Feet MMA. 2013. List of Boxes. Population 58, 29.

Tait CK, Li JL, Lamberti GA, Pearsons TN, Li HW. 1994. Relationships between riparian cover and the community structure of high desert streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 13, 45-56.

Tockner K, Bunn SE, Gordon C, Naiman RJ, Quinn GP, Stanford JA. 2008. 4 Á Flood plains: critically threatened ecosystems 79, 34-39.

Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE. 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences 37, 130-137.

Vono V, Barbosa FA. 2001. Habitats and littoral zone fish community structure of two natural lakes in southeast Brazil. Environmental Biology of Fishes 61, 371-379.

Wang J. 2012. Eco-services for urban sustainability in the Yangtze River Delta of China: strategies for physical form and planning.

Wenger S. 1999. A review of the scientific literature on riparian buffer width, extent and vegetation.

Zhang B, Yang YS, Zepp H. 2004. Effect of vegetation restoration on soil and water erosion and nutrient losses of a severely eroded clayey Plinthudult in southeastern China. Catena 57, 77-90.

Zhao T, Xu H, He Y, Tai C, Meng H, Zeng F. 2009. Agricultural non-point nitrogen pollution control function of different vegetation types in riparian wetlands: A case study in the Yellow River wetland in China. Journal of Environmental Sciences 21, 933-939.

Dilawar Khan, Gao lushuang, Huaguo Huang, Sher Shah, Sajjad Saeed, Saleem Uddin, Muhammad Nabi, Abubakar Sadiq Ibrahim, Emad Ud Din, Muhammad Amir.
Influence of riparian vegetation on living organisms: a case study of Dharabi watershed and Kallar Kahar Regions in Pakistan.
Int. J. Biosci. 14(2), 361-373, February 2019.
https://innspub.net/ijb/influence-riparian-vegetation-living-organisms-case-study-dharabi-watershed-kallar-kahar-regions-pakistan/
Copyright © 2019
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
https://innspub.net
brand
innspub logo
english language editing
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Publish Your Article
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Submit Your Article
INNSPUB on FB
Email Update