Editorial board members of International Network for Natural sciences in connection with Editor-In-Chief are bound with an ethical and honest accountability to support the researchers and interested individuals. We want to provide a wide platform with a humane support to newer researchers and creative individuals living in different parts of this world. We also want to develop a warm connection with such individuals who knows something special, novel and unusual about the scientific aspects of varied natural science and life sciences arenas.
The manuscripts submitted to innspub will be subjected to peer-review and are therefore expected to be of high quality. Manuscripts submitted for publication consideration must have the ability to make a contribution to the field of Natural sciences. This contribution may be small but meaningful and forms the rubric of what our reviewers and editors look for during the review process. Innspub applies a very vigorous review process in determining which articles are accepted and eventually being published. We strive for a rapid review and subsequent publication of high-quality manuscripts.
INNSPUB aims at rapid publication of high quality research papers with peer review process. Any article submitted to the innspub is subjected to peer-review. Being an open access and free to access journal publishing system. Submitted articles are given up to the Editor-In-Chief after final checking, who examines the manuscript. If he feels and decides that the manuscript does not cover the aspects as per the journal guidelines or out of scope of the journal and with insufficient features to be submitted for review, he may directly reject paper without any further processing. Concerned author will be informed through e-mail as early as possible about such failure to conformity and will always be supported for a newer submission. If Editor-In-Chief observes that the submitted manuscript is of enough quality and within the journal scope of the journals then it is sent to two experts of the field or reviewers. All manuscript reviewing editors have a right to reject or accept the manuscript under certain conditions. ‘INNSPUB network’ also hold right to publish submitted the articles without any processing. If the review process takes more time, authors will be informed by email with the reasons behind.
Based on reviewer’s recommendations, decision takes by the Editor-In-Chief and through for the following actions which will be implemented as early as possible.
– Publish manuscript as it is,
– Publish manuscript with minor changes,
– Review for major changes,
– Rejected manuscript.
Corresponding author will be accountable to carry out all the changes suggested by the Editor-In-Chief of INNSPUB. If minor revision is required, authors are requested to return a revised copy as soon as possible within short time while for major revision authors should return an adapted updated version within 07 days. Authors are requested to be patient and back-up in any form for the urgent publication may exclude the manuscript early before publication in the journal.
The whole ‘start to end’, manuscript ‘submission to publication’ process may take minimum of 2/5 to maximum of 15 days which is definitely less time period as compared with other publishers of present years. Authors are requested to be patient and faithful on us during this time. As per ‘innspub’ policy all the accepted papers will remain in line for publication. Authors are requested not to re-submit the rejected article to INNSPUB.
All submitted manuscripts are usually reviewed by at least two expert peer-reviewers. The assigned ‘INNSPUB’ editor reviews the manuscript and makes an initial decision based on the quality of the manuscript and editorial priorities. The assigned editor will determine either to send the manuscript to peer-reviewers or reject the manuscript. If a manuscript receives an even review by two reviewers, The reviewers submit their reports on the manuscripts along with their recommendation and peer reviewers recommend to the Editor-in-Chief whether a manuscript should be accepted, revised or rejected. The Editor-in-Chief, Editor or a senior member of the editorial board will make a decision/report based on editorial priorities, manuscript quality and reviewer’s recommendations. The decision is usually to request a revise the manuscript, reject the manuscript, or provisionally accept the manuscript. The decision/report letter is sent to the author informing him/her of the decision in the above step.
Editorial Evaluation Timeline
All submissions are initially evaluated in depth by the scientific editors. Papers that are not deemed by the editors to be strong candidates for publication will be returned to the authors without detailed review, typically within 3–5 days. Otherwise, manuscripts will be sent to reviewers who have agreed in advance to assess the paper rapidly. The editors will make every effort to reach decisions on these papers within 1-2 weeks of the submission date. If revisions are a condition of publication, editors will carefully evaluate the reviewers’ comments and, whenever possible, will provide guidance on the important concerns to be addressed. We generally allow 15 days for revisions and consider only one revised version of the paper. Evaluations of conceptual advance and significance are made based on the literature available on the day of the final decision, not the day of submission. Accepted papers will be published in print within 15 days (up to 1 month) of acceptance and, in most cases, earlier in print or online. Any major changes after acceptance are subject to review and may delay publication.