International network for natural sciences – research journal
  • mendeley icon
  • linkedin icon
  • google plus icon
  • twitter icon
  • google scholar icon
  • facebook icon

Acceptability test of different colors of shoe polish from bee products

By: Shella B Cacatian, Narcitas B Ouano

Key Words: Formulation, Acceptability test, Shoe polish, Bee products

J. Bio. Env. Sci. 16(6), 1-11, June 2020.

Certification: jbes 2020 0285 [Generate Certificate]


The use of organic materials as shoe polish is just within reach and is less polluting. This study investigated the sensory characteristics of shoe polish cream in different colors from bee products. It designed and tested appropriate packaging and labelling for the different formulations. Four groups of respondents evaluated the four formulations. Data were subjected to Analysis of Variance and to Least Significant Differences using Randomized Complete Block Design to test the disparity among the treatment means. Results depict that the shoe polish in different colors were not statistically different as regards odor, gloss, absorbency, consistency, color intensity, quick-dry ability, effectivity with respect to time and general acceptability. Likewise, the acceptability of the four groups of rater to product’s gloss and absorbency does not significantly vary. However, the relative distinction of the achieved status of raters modifies the ranking on odor, consistency, color intensity, quick-dry ability, effectivity, and general acceptability. Unopened shoe polish can remain stable for two years at room temperature and in proper storage. In the context of product packaging and labelling characteristics, the big-sized container, substrate type, pictorial elements and verbal information of the label are the most significant attributes affecting the preference of the raters.

| Views 76 |

| Views 76 |

Acceptability test of different colors of shoe polish from bee products

Abdullah MSP, Noordin MI, Ismail SIM, Mustapha NM. 2018. Recent advances in the use of animal-sourced gelatine as natural polymers for food, cosmetics and pharmaceutical applications. Sains Malaysiana 45(2), 323-336. 576/ jsm-2018-4702-15

Akhtar N, Ahmed I, Jafar HY, Rizwan A, Nawaz JM. 2016. The Impact of packaging, price and brand awareness on brand loyalty: A reseller perspective in mobile sector of Pakistan. International Review of Management and Business Research 5(3), 790-807. http://www.irmbrj

Ambaw M, Teklehaimanot T. 2018. Characterization of beekeeping production and marketing system and major constraints in selected districts of Arsi and West Arsi zones of Oromia region in Ethiopia. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 6(2), 2408-2414. http://www.entomol

Arevalo-Gallegos A, Ahmad Z, Asgher M, Parra R, Iqbal HM. 2017. Lignocellulose: A sustainable material to produce value-added products with a zero waste approach—A review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 99, 308-318. 2017.02.097

Berem RM. 2009. Analysis of the constraints and effects of value addition in honey among producers in Baringo District, Kenya. Published Master’s Thesis. Agricultural and Applied Economics. Egerton University, Kenya. /jspui/bitstream/123456789/144/1/ANALYSIS%20OF%20THE%20CONSTRAINTS%20AND%20EFFECTS%20OF%20VALUE.pdf

Boholano H. 2017. Smart social networking: 21st century teaching and learning skills. Research in Pedagogy 7(1), 21-29.

Bradbear N. 2009. Bees and their role in forest livelihoods: a guide to the services provided by bees and the sustainable harvesting, processing and marketing of their products. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Cacatian SB. 2016. Physical characteristics and shelf life of shoe polish cream from coconut and bee products. Asian Intellect for Academic Organization and Development Research and Education Journal 4, 71-76

Cash RM. 2017. Advancing differentiation: Thinking and learning for the 21st century. Free Spirit Publishing.

De Figueiredo HS, Meuwissen MP, Van der Lans IA, Oude Lansink AG. 2016. Identifying successful strategies for honey value chains in Brazil: A conjoint study. British Food Journal 118(7), 1800-1820.

Djekic I, Smigic N. 2016. Food labels–Status and consumers’ attitude on the Serbian food market. Nutrition & Food Science 46(2), 204-216.

Draskovic N, Temperley J, Pavicic J. 2009. Comparative perception(s) of consumer goods packaging: Croatian consumers’ perspective(s). International Journal of Management Cases. Special Issue: CIRCLE Conference 2009 pp. 154-163(10).

Edwards A, Schwab C, Shevlin T. 2016. Financial constraints and cash tax savings. The Accounting Review 91(3), 859-881. accr-51282

Essays UK. 2013. Shine shoe polish.

Fearne A, Martinez MG, Dent B. 2012. Dimensions of sustainable value chains: Implications for value chain analysis. Supply Chain Management 17(6), 575-581. /1359854 121 12 69193

Francer C. 2017. Wine label market research: The eyes have it. /article/wine-label-market-research-the-eyes-have-t/

Gebru YG. 2015. Characterization of beekeeping systems and honey value chain, and effects of storage containers and durations on physico-chemical properties of honey in Kilte Awlaelo District, Eastern Tigray, Ethiopia. Published Dissertation. College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University. http://localhost:80/xmlui/handle /12 3456789/5220

Habibi H, Khosravi-Darani K. 2017. Effective variables on production and structure of xanthan gum and its food applications: A review. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 10, 130-140. https://doi. org/ 10.1016/j.bcab.2017.02.013

Harith ZT, Ting CH, Zakaria NNA. 2014. Coffee packaging: Consumer perception on appearance, branding and pricing. International Food Research Journal 21(3), 849-853. https://www.researchgate .net/publication/272477828_Coffee_packaging_Consumer_perception_on_appearance_branding_and_p

Herbes C, Beuthner C, Ramme I. 2018. Consumer attitudes towards biobased packaging–A cross-cultural comparative study. Journal of Cleaner Production 194, 203-218. j.jcl epro. 2018.05.106

Hoberg G, Maksimovic V. 2015. Redefining financial constraints: A text-based analysis. The Review of Financial Studies 28(5), 1312-1352.

International Education Advisory Board. 2014. Learning in the 21st century: Teaching today’s students on their terms. file:///C:/Users/User/ Downloads/Documents/IEAB_Whitepaper040808.p

Jakpa MM. 2016. Value chain and economic analysis of honey production in Nkwanta North and South Districts of the Volta Region. Published Master’s Thesis. Department of Agricultural Economics, Agribusiness and Extension, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology. http://

Krell R. 2011. Value-added products from beekeeping. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin No. 124.

Krishna GAG, Raj GB, Ajit SK, Prasanth PK, Chandrashekar P. 2010. Coconut oil: chemistry, production and its applications – A review. Indian Coconut Journal. publication/235780162_Coconut_Oil_Chemistry_Production_and_Its_Applications_-_A_Review

Laeng B, Suegami T, Aminihajibashi S. 2016. Wine labels: An eye-tracking and pupillometry study. International Journal of Wine Business Research 28(4), 327-348. from 10.1108/IJWBR-03-2016-0009

Lantos GP. 2015. Consumer behavior in action: Real-life applications for marketing managers. United Kingdom: Taylor and Francis.

Leng G, Adan RAH, Belot M, Brunstrom JM, de Graaf K, Dickson SL, Hare T, Maier S, Menzies J, Preissl H, Reisch LA, Rogers PJ, Smeets PAM. 2017. The determinants of food choice. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 76(3), 316-327.

Minja GS, Nkumilwa TJ. 2016. The role of beekeeping on forest conservation and poverty alleviation in Moshi Rural District, Tanzania. European Scientific Journal 12(23). /10.19044/esj.2016.v12n23p366

Muhammad Zeeshan Z. 2014. Consumer age influence on food label reading habitManagement Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University 25(3), 26-30. https://ideas.repec .org/a/brc /journl /v25y2014i3p26-30.html

Pater R. 2016. Overcoming limiting safety leadership mindsets. Occupational Health & Safety 85(5), 66-66. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/

Premratanachai P, Chanchao C. 2014. Review of the anticancer activities of bee products. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 4(5), 337-44.

Refaa Z, Boutaous MH, Xin S, Siginer DA. 2017. Thermophysical analysis and modeling of the crystallization and melting behavior of PLA with talc. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 128(2), 687-698.

Rocchi B, Stefani G. 2006. Consumers’ perception of wine packaging: A case study. International Journal of Wine Marketing 18(1), 33-44.

Schiffman LG, Kanuk LL. 2004. Consumer behavior, 10th International edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Singh R. 2012. Formulation & thermophysical analysis of a beeswax microemulsion & the experimental calculation of its heat transfer coefficient. Published Master’s Thesis. City University of New York, Energy Institute.

Tarekegn K, Girma G, Assefa A. 2017. Value chain analysis of honey in Kaffa and Sheka Zones of SNNPR, Ethiopia. International Journal of Research in Agricultural Sciences 4(3), 142-148.

Shella B Cacatian, Narcitas B Ouano.
Acceptability test of different colors of shoe polish from bee products.
J. Bio. Env. Sci. 16(6), 1-11, June 2020.
Copyright © 2020
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
innspub logo
english language editing
    Publish Your Article
    Submit Your Article
Email Update