International network for natural sciences – research journal
  • mendeley icon
  • linkedin icon
  • google plus icon
  • twitter icon
  • google scholar icon
  • facebook icon

Growth and economic potential of newly established Cacao (Theobrama cacao) plantation intercropped with glutinous Corn (Zea mays) and Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)

By: Angelina T. Gonzales, Boyet Pattung, Roldan Sawadan

Key Words: Grafted, Mungbean, Leaf area index, Glutinous corn, Economic potential

J. Bio. Env. Sci. 16(5), 39-45, May 2020.

Certification: jbes 2020 0281 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

The research was conducted at the Cagayan State University at Lal-lo from June 2017 to March 2018 to establish a CSU demonstration farm for cacao-based integrated multi- story cropping system by intercropping mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) and glutinous corn (Zea mays) during establishment stage of cacao farming and to showcase its economic potential. Specifically, it aimed to determine the following: the plant height, number of leaves, survival rate, leaf area index, plant height of glutinous corn and mungbean, pods of mungbean, length of corn ear, yield per plot(kg) and return of investment. It was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three treatments and replicated three times. The treatments were: T1- cacao as control, T2- cacao + glutinous corn and T3- cacao + mungbean. No significant differences among the treatments on the plant height, number of leaves, and leaf area index. However, there are significant differences in terms of survival rate, plant height of glutinous corn and mungbean, pods of mungbean, length of corn ear, yield/plot (kg). Grafted cacao seedlings intercropped with glutinous corn produced highest net income and return on investment compared to mungbean. Therefore, planting cacao intercropped with glutinous corn is recommended to the Lal-lo farmers to obtain higher income during the establishment stage. Another trial must be conducted to give more conclusive results and another research must be conducted using other intercropped.

| Views 7 |

| Views 7 |

Growth and economic potential of newly established Cacao (Theobrama cacao) plantation intercropped with glutinous Corn (Zea mays) and Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)

Addo-Quaye A. 2011. Growth Analysis of Component Crops in a Maize-soybean Intercropping Systems as Affected by Time of Planting and Spatial Intercrop (source https://www.researchgate. netfile.postfile. html?59c89e2a4085403d14134 fc&as seey= AS% AS4235 9181946880%401506319913540.

Adeyemi A. 1999. Effective Intercropping Systems for Young Cocoa. (source: http://orton.catie.ac.cr /repdoc /A8090i.pdf

Agbeniyi E. 2010. Fertizer Use of Cocoa Production in Cross River State, Nigeria (source: www. ijert. orging)

Arthur A, Acquaye S, Dogbatse JA. 2019. Effect of some organic, inorganic and foliar fertilizers on the growth of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) seedlings raised in soils of contrasting characteristics.

Aya RAM. 2017. PCAARRD [Philippine Council for Agriculture, Aquatic and Natural Resources Research and Development] Philippine Council for Agriculture, Aquatic and Natural Resources Research and Development] Monitor (Philippines). organic vegetable project empowers women through improved livelihood. PCAARRD

Beg MS, Ahmad S, Jan K, Bashir K. 2017. Status, supply chain and processing of cocoa-A review. Trends in food science & technology 66, pp. 108-116.

Bertoldi D, Barbero A, Camin F, Caligiani A, Larcher R. 2016. Multielemental fingerprinting and geographic traceability of Theobroma cacao beans and cocoa products. Food Control 65, pp. 46-53.

Dasgupta Poushali. 2016. Growing Cacao as an intercrop increases yield and farmers profitability https://www.google.com.ph/amp/www. financial express. com/industry//growing -cocoa-asan -intercrop-increases- yield-a farmer profitability

Dimitrios S. 2010. Weed- Suppresive effects of maize- legume intercropping in organic farming. International J. Pest Management 56(2), 173181. (source www.Tandonline.com/doilfull/10.1080 /0967-0870870903304471. src=recsys

Dunmola AO, Omobowale O, Iyabo A. 2015. Competitiveness of cocoa-based farming household in Nigeria. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics 7(2), pp.80-84.

Dwivedi A, Dev I, Kumar V, Yadav RS, Yadav M, Gupta D, Singh A, Tomar SS. 2015. Potential role of maize-legume intercropping systems to improve soil fertility status under smallholder farming systems for sustainable agriculture in India. International Journal of Life Sciences Biotechnology and Pharma Research 4(3), p.145.

Gebru H. 2015. A review on the comparative advantages of intercropping to mono-cropping system. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare 5(9), pp.1-13.

Hamburda SB, Munteanu N, Teliban GC. 2015. Intercropping-a Successful System for Runner Bean Crop. Bulletin of university of agricultural sciences and veterinary medicine cluj-napoca. Horticulture 72(1), pp.81-86.

Ibiremo OS, Iloyanomon CI, Oloyede AA, Lawal JO, Alhassan I. 2017. Strengthening Cocoa Production through Site Specific Fertilizer Recommendation in Five Local Government Areas of Cross River State, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International pp.1-11.

Isaac ME, Ulzen-Appiah F,Timmer VR, Quashie-Sam SJ. 2007. Early growth and nutritional response to resource competition in cocoa-shade intercropped systems (source: http:// www. world cocoa foundation.org/wpcontent/ uploads/ f ilesmf/ isaac 2007 g.pdf)

Magat SS. 2004. Growing of Intercrops in Mango lands to generate more food and agricultural products, jobs and enhancing farm income. Mango Intercropping Primer. Published by PCA- Diliman Quezon City. Dec. 2004. 7 p. (source: www.pca. da.gov. ph/ pdf/techno/mangocacao.pdf

Mango N, Makate C, Tamene L, Mponela P, Ndengu G. 2018. Adoption of small-scale irrigation farming as a climate-smart agriculture practice and its influence on household income in the Chinyanja Triangle, Southern Africa. Land 7(2), p.49.

Parvez MN, Islam MS, Haque T, Munawar FM, Najrul Islam H. Economic evaluation of mixed cropping of Mungbean with off-season Tossa jute seed crop. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research 12(01), pp.1021-1028.

Pros and Cons. 2015. Advantages and disadvantages of intercropping (retrieved from https //connect us fund. org /6-advantages-and-disadvantages-of intercropping.

Requita ED. 2003. Potential of mixed cropping corn and mungbean in Arakan Valley, Cotabato. Unpublished Ms. USM, Kabacan, Cotabato, Philippines 76pp. (source: https://usm.edu.ph/online journal/index.php/USMjournal/article/download/39

Singh SK, Singh SK, Singh S. 2018. Vegetable crops as most efficient and economical intercrops: a brief review. Plant Archives 18(1), pp. 923-929.

Stagnari F, Maggio A, Galieni A, Pisante M. 2017. Multiple benefits of legumes for agriculture sustainability: an overview. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture 4(1), p.2.

Sumalde ZM, Quilloy KP. 2015. Improving marketing efficiency through agricultural cooperatives: successful cases in the Philippines

Weerarathne LVY, Marambe B, Chauhan BS. 2017. Intercropping as an effective component of integrated weed management in tropical root and tuber crops: A review. Crop protection 95, pp. 89-100.

Angelina T. Gonzales, Boyet Pattung, Roldan Sawadan.
Growth and economic potential of newly established Cacao (Theobrama cacao) plantation intercropped with glutinous Corn (Zea mays) and Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.).
J. Bio. Env. Sci. 16(5), 39-45, May 2020.
https://innspub.net/jbes/growth-economic-potential-newly-established-cacao-theobrama-cacao-plantation-intercropped-glutinous-corn-zea-mays-mungbean-vigna-radiata-l/
Copyright © 2020
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
https://innspub.net
brand
innspub logo
english language editing
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Publish Your Article
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Submit Your Article
INNSPUB on FB
Email Update