International network for natural sciences – research journal
  • mendeley icon
  • linkedin icon
  • google plus icon
  • twitter icon
  • google scholar icon
  • facebook icon

Lessons for REDD+ implementation: Insights from assessment of forest governance in the joint forest management system in Zambia

By: Jane Musole Kwenye, Nelly Chunda-Mwango

Key Words: REDD+, Forests, Forest governance, Joint forest management, Greenhouse gas emissions

J. Bio. Env. Sci. 12(2), 1-10, February 2018.

Certification: jbes 2018 0177 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

To draw lessons for informing strategies for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and fostering conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks (REDD+), this study assessed community members’ perceptions of the quality of forest governance in the joint forest management program relative to the ideal forest governance quality using the Katanino Joint Forest Management study area in Zambia. The study focused on six elements of good governance, namely participation, transparency, accountability, equity, efficiency and effectiveness. Using a two stage sampling procedure, data for this study was collected using questionnaires administered to 120 randomly selected community members who participated in the Joint Forest Management program in Serenje, Biwa and Bwengo villages of Katanino Joint Forest Management pilot area. Results showed considerable gaps between ideal quality of forest governance and the perceived quality of forest governance. One sample t-test results showed that the perceived quality of all the six governance elements were statistically different from the ideal quality of forest governance at the 95 % confidence interval, participation (t (119) = -76, ρ < 0.05), transparency (t (119) = -130, ρ < 0.05), accountability (t (119) = -82, ρ < 0.05), equity (t (119) = -53.47, ρ < 0.05), effectiveness (t (119) = -60, ρ < 0.05), efficiency (t (119) = -87, ρ < 0.05). Implications of these findings are highlighted through a governance lens to inform strategies for REDD+ implementation.

| Views 93 |

Lessons for REDD+ implementation: Insights from assessment of forest governance in the joint forest management system in Zambia

Broekhoven G, Savenije H, Scheliha S. 2012. Moving forward with forest governance. European Tropical Forest Network News. Issue No. 53.

Burns AC, Bush RF. 1995. Marketing research. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Corbera E, Schroeder H. 2011. Governing and implementing REDD+. Environmental Science and Policy 14, 89-99;

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.11.002.

DESA. 2009. Public governance indicators: A literature review. United Nations. New York.

FAO, PROFOR. 2011. Assessing and monitoring forest governance: A user’s guide to a diagnostic tool. Programme on Forests.

GFI. 2009. The governance of forest toolkit (version 1): A draft framework of indicators for assessing governance of the forest sector. The governance of forests initiative.

Giri K. 2006. Resource complexities and governance mechanisms: Evaluating community forestry program of Nepal. University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences. Austria.

Gregersen H, El Lakany H, Karsenty A, White A. 2010. Does the opportunity cost approach indicate the real cost of REDD+. Rights and Realities of paying for REDD+. Rights and Resources Initiative. Washington DC.

Gyawali A. 2009. Assessing governance of community forest user groups: A case study from Makwanpur District, Nepal. B.Sc. Forestry research thesis. Tribhuvan University. Institute of Forestry. Pokhara Nepal.

Harvey CA, Dickson B, Kormo C. 2010. Opportunities for achieving biodiversity conservation through REDD. Conservation Letters 3(1), 53-61.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263x.2009.00086.x

Kanowski PJ, McDermott CL, Cashore BW. 2011. Implementing REDD+: Lessons from analysis of forest governance. Environmental Science and Policy 14(2), 111-117.

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.11.007

Kelly DJ. 2010. The case for social safeguards in a Post-2012 Agreement on REDD. Law, Environment and Development Journal 6(1), 61-81.

www.lead-journal.org/content/10061.pdf

Kokwe M. 2012. Forest management practices with potential for REDD+ in Zambia. Ministry of Lands, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection.

Kwenye JM, Freimund W. 2016. Domestic tourists’ loyalty to a local natural tourist setting: Examining predictors from relational and transactional perspectives using a Zambian context. Tourism Management Perspectives 20, 161-173.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2016.08.006

Iqbal M, Hussain A. 2013. Analysis of elements of forest governance in joint forest management systems: a comparative study of actual and ideal forest governance in Allai Guzara forest, Hazara tribal forest division, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences 3(9), 23-30.

www.innspub.net

ITTO FAO. 2009. Forest governance and climate change mitigation. Policy Brief.

Larson AM, Petkova E. 2011. An introduction to forest governance, people and REDD+ in Latin America: Obstacles and opportunities. Forests 2, 86-111.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f2010086.

Leventon J, Kalaba FK, Dyer JC, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ. 2014. Delivering community benefits through REDD+: Lesson from Joint Forest Management in Zambia. Forest Policy and Economics 44, 10-17.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1062/j.forpol.2014.03.005

Matakala PW. 2016. ILUA II ZFAP preparatory review. Technical report No.6. Ministry of Lands, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection.

Mbewe M. 2007. The roles of traditional leadership and communities in community-based natural resources management in Zambia. Reclassification and effective management of the national protected areas system project. Ministry of Tourism, Environment and Natural Resources.

Pedroni L, Dutschke M, Streck C, Estrada Porrua M. 2009. Creating incentives for avoiding further deforestation: The nested approach. Climate Policy 9, 207-220.

Secco L, Re DR, Pettenella DM, Gatto P. 2014. Why and how to measure forest governance at local level: A set of indicators. Forest Policy and Economics 49, 57-71.

Http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.07.006

Sekeleti M. 2011. Integrating forest governance monitoring into existing related national monitoring systems. Background paper.

Umar BB, Vedeld P. 2012. Joint Forest Management in Katanino, Zambia: Inappropriate property regime change? The Open Forest Journal 5, 42-52.

UNDP, UNEP, FAO, Government of Zambia. 2010. UN collaborative programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing countries, National Joint Programme Document. UN-REDD programme.

UNFCC. 2010. The Cancun Agreement: Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc working group on long term co-operative action under the convention, in: UNFCC (Ed.), UNFCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1.

Jane Musole Kwenye, Nelly Chunda-Mwango.
Lessons for REDD+ implementation: Insights from assessment of forest governance in the joint forest management system in Zambia.
J. Bio. Env. Sci. 12(2), 1-10, February 2018.
https://innspub.net/jbes/lessons-redd-implementation-insights-assessment-forest-governance-joint-forest-management-system-zambia/
Copyright © 2018
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
https://innspub.net
brand
innspub logo
english language editing
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Publish Your Article
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Submit Your Article
INNSPUB on FB
Email Update