International network for natural sciences – research journal
  • mendeley icon
  • linkedin icon
  • google plus icon
  • twitter icon
  • google scholar icon
  • facebook icon

The soil microbiological properties assessment due sugarcane vinasse application

By: Bistok Hasiholan Simanjuntak, Cratie Pinkan. R. Lengkong

Key Words: Sugarcane vinasse, Soil microbiology

J. Bio. Env. Sci. 11(4), 251-260, October 2017.

Certification: jbes 2017 0106 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

The sugarcane vinasse is a residue from the sugar-ethanol industry which is high of organic matter and nutrient and it can effect on soil properties, crop growth, and production. The research aims to know on testing the effect of sugarcane vinasse on soil microbiological condition also to know dose range of sugarcane vinasse application to soil microbiological condition. The field experiment was conducted with five sugarcane vinasse doses are 0m3.ha-1, 20m3.ha-1, 40m3.ha-1, 60m3.ha-1, 80m3.ha-1 and established in a Randomized Complete Block Design with five replications. Sugarcane vinasse contains high organic matter and a number of nutrients such as N, P, K and a slightly acidic pH. Application of sugarcane vinasse to the soil is the same when other liquid organic fertilizer applications. The presence of organic matter and nutrients in sugarcane vinasse makes the application of sugarcane vinasse can affect some soil microbiological properties. The obtained data revealed that the application of sugarcane vinasse had significant differences to C/N ratio soil, microbial biomass carbon, and total microorganism.

| Views 66 |

The soil microbiological properties assessment due sugarcane vinasse application

Ananyeva ND, Susyan EA, Chernova OV, Wirth S. 2008. Microbial respiration activities of soils from different climatic regions of European Russia. European Journal of Soil Biology 44,147-157.

Anas Iswandi. 1989. Soil biology in practice. Bogor: Bogor Agricultural University.

Anderson JM, JSI Ingram. 1993. Tropical soil biological and fertility. A handbook of methods (Second edition) CAN International. Wallingford UK.

Anita Ravindran, Shang Shyng Yang. 2015. Effects of vegetation type on microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in subalpine mountain forest soils. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology, and Infection 48(4), 362-369.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2014.02.003

Armengol JE, Lorenzo, Noemi F. 2003. Use of vinasses dilutions in water as an alternative for improving chemical properties of sugarcane planted vertisols. Cultivostropicales 24(3), 73-76.

Bhattarai A, Bhattarai B, Pandey S. 2015. Variation of soil microbial population in different soil horizons variation of soil microbial population in different soil horizons. Journal of Microbiology & Experimentation 2(2), 00044.

http://dx.doi.org/10. 15406/jmen.2015.02.00044

Bistok Hasiholan Simanjuntak. 2013. Liquid organic fertilizer technology based on sugarcane vinasse. Faculty of Agriculture and Bussiness. Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

Blagodatskii SA, Bogomolova IN, Blagodatskaya EV. 2008. Microbial biomass and growth kinetics of microorganisms in Chernozem soils under different land use modes. Microbiology 77, 99-106.

Braunbeck OA, Cortez LA. 2000. Sugar cane culture and use of residue. In: F. Rosillo-Calle, SV Bajay, H Rothman, Ed. Industrial uses of biomass energy. London, CRC Press p.119-139.

Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G, Jenkinson DS. 1985. Chloroform fumigation and release of soil nitrogen; a rapid extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in the soil. Soil Biol. Biochem 17, 837-842.

Cerny J, Balik J, Kulhanek M, Neded V. 2008. The changes in microbial biomass C and N in long-term field experiments. Plant Soil Environ 54, 212-218.

Christofoletti CA, Escher JP, Correia JE, Marinho JFU, Fontanetti CS. 2013. Sugarcane vinasse: environmental implications of its use. Waste Management 33, 2752-2761.

http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.09.005

Cunha RRC, Costa RCS, Maset FB, Casarini DCP. 1987. Effects of irrigation with vinasse and the dynamics of its constituents in the soil: I. Physical and chemical aspects. Water Sci. Tech. 19(8), 155-165.

De Lorenzo ME, Scott GI, Ross PE. 2001. Toxicity of pesticides to aquatic microorganisms: a review. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 20, 84-98.

Decloux M, Bories A. 2002. Stillage treatment in the French alcohol fermentation industry, Int. Sugar Journal 104, 509-517.

Delgado Antonio, Jose A Gomez. 2016. The Soil Physical, Chemical, and Biological Properties. In: FJ Villalobos, E Fereres, Ed. Principles of agronomy for sustainable agriculture. Springer International Publishing AG.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46116-8_2

Dowd MK, Johansen SL, Cantarella L, Reilly PJ. 1994. Low molecular weight organic composition of ethanol stillage from sugarcane molasses, citrus waste, and sweet whey, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 42(2), 283-288.

Eckenfelder W. 2008. Industrial water pollution control 3thed, New York: Mc Graw-Hill p.15-64.

Espana Gamboa E, Mijangos Cortes J, Barahona Perez L, Dominguez Maldonado J, Hernandez Zarate G, Alzate Gaviria L. 2011. Vinasses: characterization and treatments. Waste Management. Res 29, 1235-1250.

http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/ 0734242X10387313

Gemtos TA, Chouliaras N, Marakis ST. 1999. Vinasse rate, time of application and compaction effect on soil properties and durum wheat crop. J Agric Eng Res 73, 283-296.

http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1006/jaer.1999.0419

Gervasio Pineiro, Martin Oesterheld, Williamb Batista, Jose M, Paruelo. 2006. Opposite changes of whole-soil vs. pools C:N ratios: a case of Simpson’s paradox with implications on nitrogen cycling. Journal compilation. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Global Change Biology 12, 804-809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01139.x

Gomez J, Rodríguez O. 2000. Effects of vinasse on sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) productivity. Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ) 17, 318-326.

Gopal A, Kammen D. 2009. Molasses for ethanol: the economic and environmental impacts of a new pathway for the lifecycle greenhouse gas analysis of sugarcane ethanol, Environ. Res. Letters 4, 1-5.

Hakim N, Nyakpa MY, Lubis AM, Nugroho SGH, Diha MA, Go B Hong, Bailey HH. 1986. Fundamentals of soil science. University of Lampung.

Handayanto E, Hairiah K. 2007. Soil Biology: The foundation of healthy soil management. Pustaka Adipura. Yogyakarta.

Jia Cheng Yang, Heribert Insam. 1991. Microbial biomass and relative contributions of bacteria and fungi in the soil beneath tropical rain forest, Hainan Island, China. Journal of Tropical Ecology. Cambridge University Press 7(3), 385-393.

Jiang ZP, Li YR, Wei GP, Liao Q, Su TM, Meng YC, Zhang HY, Lu CY. 2012. Effect of long-term vinasse application on physicochemical properties of sugarcane field soils. Sugar Tech 14(4), 412-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12355-012-0174-9

Jorg Schnecker, Birgit Wild, Florian Hofhansl, Ricardo J Eloy Alves, Jiri Barta, Petr Capek, Lucia Fuchslueger, Norman Gentsch, Antje Gittel, Georg Guggenberger, Angelika Hofer, Sandra Kienzl, Anna Knoltsch, Nikolay Lashchinskiy, Robert Mikutta, Olga Shibistova, Mounir Takriti, Tim Urich, Georg Weltin, Andreas Richter. 2014. Effects of soil organic matter properties and microbial community composition on enzyme activities in cryoturbated arctic soils. PLoS One 9(4), e94076. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094076.

Lahlah J, Renault P, Cazevieille P, Buzet A, Hazemann JL, Womes M. 2009. Geochemical resilience of a Ferralsol subjected to anoxia and organic matter amendment. Soil Science Society of America Journal 73, 1958.

Leita, L, Nobili MD, Mondini C. 1999. Influence of inorganic and organic fertilization on soil microbial biomass, metabolic quotient and heavy metal bioavailability. Biol. Fert. Soils 28, 371-376.

Liu M, Li ZP, Zhang TL, Jiang CY, Che YP. 2011. Discrepancy in response of rice yield and soil fertility to long-term chemical fertilization and organic amendments in paddy soils cultivated from infertile upland in subtropical China. Agricultural Sciences in China 10(2), 259-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1671-2927(11)60003-5

Luis Augusto Barbosa Cortez, Carlos Eduardo Vaz Rossell, Rodrigo Aparecido Jordan, Manoel Regis Lima Verde Leal, Electo Eduardo Silva Lora. 2014. Research and development need in the industrial production of vinasse. In: Luis Augusto Barbosa Cortez, Edgard Blucher, Ed. Sugarcane bioethanol-R&D for productivity and sustainability, Sao Paulo.

Madejon L, Lopez R, Murillo JM, Cabrera F. 2001. Agricultural use of three (sugar-beet) vinasse composts: effect on crops and chemical properties of a Cambisols soil in the Guadalquivir river valley (SW Spain). Agr. Ecosystem Environ 84, 55-65.

Martens R. 1995. Current methods for measuring microbial biomass C in soil: potential and limitations. Biol. Fertility Soils 19, 87-99.

Meng YC, Tang QZ, Liu Z, Chen GF, Wang Y. 2009. Impact of several organic materials of sugar industry on soil microbe population in sugarcane field. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences 22(2), 389-392.

Michael Lehman R, Cynthia A, Cambardella, Diane E, Stott, Veronica Acosta Martinez, Daniel K, Manter, Jeffrey S, Buyer, Jude E, Maul, Jeffrey L, Smith, Harold, Collins P, Jonathan J, Halvorson, Robert J Kremer, Jonathan, Lundgren G, Tom Ducey F, Virginia, Jin L, Douglas, Karlen L. 2015. Understanding and enhancing soil biological health: the solution for reversing soil degradation. Sustainability 7, 988-1027. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su7010988.

Mohamed Awad Fagier AA, Elmugdad, MEA, Aziz, Nazar, Gabra M. 2015. Identification of some Organic Compounds in Sugarcane vinasse by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry and Prediction of their Toxicity Using Test Method. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences 8(4).

www.jchps.com.

Popelarova E, Vorisek K, Strnadova S. 2007. Relations between activities and counts of soil microorganisms. Article in the conference Practical Solutions for Managing Optimum C and N Content in Agricultural Soils IV, 2007, Prague, Czech Republic.

Raiesi F, Asadi E. 2006. Soil microbial activity and litter turnover in native grazed and ungrazed rangelands in a semiarid ecosystem. Biol Fertil Soils 43,76-82.

Rajagopal Vadivel, Paramjit Singh Minhas, Suresh Kumar P, Yogeswar Singh, Nageshwar Rao DVK, Avinash Nirmale. 2014. Significance of vinasses waste management in agriculture and environmental quality-Review. African Journal of Agricultural Research 9(38), 2862-2873. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2014.8819

Richard, Haney L, Alan, Franzluebbers J, Virginia Jin L, Mari, Vaughn, Johnson, Elizabeth Haney B, Mike White J, Robert Harmel D. 2012. Soil organic C: N vs. water-extractable organic C: N. Open Journal of Soil Science 2, 269-274.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2012.23032

Saraswati R, Husen E, Simanungkalit RDM. 2007. Soil biological analysis method. Bogor: Indonesian R & D Center for Agricultural Land Resources.

Sarig S, Steinberger Y. 1994. Microbial biomass response to seasonal fluctuation in soil salinity under the canopy of desert halophytes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26(10), 1405-1408.

Shunfeng Ge, Haigang Xu, Mengmeng Ji, Yuanmao Jiang. 2013. Characteristics of soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and C/N ratio in chinese apple orchards. Open Journal of Soil Science 3, 213-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2013.35025

Steel RGD, Torrie JH. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach. Second Edition, Mc. Graw Hill, New York.

Sui YY, Zhang XY, Jiao XG, Wang QC, Zhao J. 2005. Effect of longterm different fertilizer applications on organic matter and nitrogen of black farm-land. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 19(6), 190-192.

Susilawati, Mustoyo, Budhisurya E, Anggono RC, Bistok W, Simanjuntak H. 2013. Soil fertility analysis with indicators of soil microorganisms on various land use systems in plateau dieng. Agricultural Journal of Agric 25(1), 64-72. http://repository.uksw.edu/handle/123456789/4703

Tejada Marco Antonio Giron. 2010. Use of vinasse for soil reclamation and its impact on elemental loads in vertisol soil and groundwater. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol 27.

Ueno J, Roberta C, da Costa S, Carlos A, Gimenes ML, Zanin GM. 2014. Agricultural recycling of biodigester vinasse for lettuce production. Ambiente & Água An Interdisciplinary J. Appl. Science 9(4), 593-601.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4136/ambiarua.1313.

Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem 19, 703-707.

Verstraete W. 1981. Practical notes on soil microbiology. Ghent: Faculty of Agriculture, State University of Ghent.

Vivek Dwivedi, Prafulla Soni. 2011. A review on the role of soil microbial biomass in eco-restoration of a degraded ecosystem with special reference to mining areas. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 3(1),151-158.

www.ansfoundation.org.

Zhao Fazhu, Sun Jiao, Ren Chengjie, Kang Di, Deng Jian, Han Xinhui, Yang Gaihe, Feng Yongzhong, Ren Guangxin. 2015. Land use change influences soil C, N, and P stoichiometry under ‘Grain-to-Green Program’ in China. Scientific Report 5, 10195.

Bistok Hasiholan Simanjuntak, Cratie Pinkan. R. Lengkong.
The soil microbiological properties assessment due sugarcane vinasse application.
J. Bio. Env. Sci. 11(4), 251-260, October 2017.
https://innspub.net/jbes/soil-microbiological-properties-assessment-due-sugarcane-vinasse-application/
Copyright © 2017
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
https://innspub.net
brand
innspub logo
english language editing
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Publish Your Article
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Submit Your Article
INNSPUB on FB
Email Update