Watershed conservation prioritization using morphometric parameters applied with principal component analysis approach

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/11/2021
Views (435) Download (20)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Watershed conservation prioritization using morphometric parameters applied with principal component analysis approach

Shiella Lynn D. Goyo, George R. Puno
J. Bio. Env. Sci.19( 5), 7-22, November 2021.
Certificate: JBES 2021 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

The present study analyzed and quantified the different morphometric aspects of the Upper Pulangi Watershed in Bukidnon, Philippines using a 10-m spatial resolution digital elevation model. The study was carried out using geospatial techniques to quantify morphometric parameters relative to the tendency of the watershed to erosion threat to provide basis and guidelines in prioritizing watersheds that need an immediate rehabilitation and conservation. Morphometric analysis applied with Principal Component Analysis was used in prioritizing watersheds. Principal Component Analysis is a dimension-reduction tool that can be used to reduce a large set of variables to a small set that still contains most of the information in the large set. It also decreases the dimensionality of the data set and identifies a new meaningful underlying variable. Results showed that Nabalintungan sub watershed with a compound ranking value (Cp = 4.17) was classified under very high priority followed by the Maapag sub watershed with (Cp = 4.25) thus, implying more attention for conservation measures. Upper pulangi sub watershed with (Cp = 6.75) was classified under very low priority followed by the Sawaga sub watershed with (Cp = 6.00), signifying promising environmental condition among the nine sub watershed areas. The study provides significant information that are helpful to watershed managers and planners in coming up with an informed decision and actions in relation to planning for watershed management, for soil and water conservation programs and project implementation under limited resources.

VIEWS 34

Adhikary PP, Dash CJ. 2018. Morphometric analysis of Katra Watershed         of Eastern Ghats: A GIS approach. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science 7(3), 1651-1665. (14 pages).

Agarwal CS. (1998). Study of drainage pattern through aerial data in Naugarh area of Varanasi district, U.P. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing 2(6),169-175. (6 pages).

Ahmed F, Rao KS. 2014. Morphometric and hypsometric analysis of Sairang Sub-basin for Natural Resources Management. Proceeding of the National Seminar on Management of Natural Resources for Sustainable Development: Challenges and Opportunities held at Department of Geography and Resource Management, School of Earth Sciences, Mizoram University pp 244-256.

Ali SA. Ikbal J. 2015. Prioritization based on geomorphic characteristics of Ahar watershed, Udaipur district, Rajasthan, India using Remote Sensing and GIS. Journal of Environmental Research and Development 10(1), 187-200. (13 pages).

Ali U, Ali SA, Ikbal J, Bashir M, Fadhi M, Ahmad M, Al-dharab H, Ali S. 2018. Soil erosion risk and flood behaviour assessment of Sukhang catchment, Kashmir basin: Using GIS and remote sensing. Journal of Remote Sensing GIS 7(1), 1-8. (8 pages).

Ali U, Ali SA. 2014. Analysis of drainage morphometry and watershed prioritization of Romushi-Sasar catchment, Kashmir valley, India using remote sensing and GIS technology. International Journal of Advanced Research 2(12), 5-23. (18 pages).

Burrough P. 1994. Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment. Oxford Science. Retrieved from

Chandrashekar H, Lokesh KV, Sameena M, Roopa J, Ranganna G. 2015. GIS-based morphometric analysis of two reservoir catchments of Arkavati River, Ramanagaram District, Karnataka. Aquatic Procedia 4(2), 1345-1353. (8 pages).

DENR. 2008. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Memorandum Circular No. 2008-05 Series of 2008. Guidelines in the Preparation of Integrated Watershed Management Plans, Annex B, Watershed Characterization Report Annotated Outline, (21 pages).

Dikpal RL, Prasad TJR, Satish K. 2017. Evaluation of morphometric parameters derived from Cartosat-1 DEM using remote sensing and GIS techniques for Budigere Amanikere watershed, Dakshina Pinakini Basin, Karnataka. India. Applied Water Sciences 7(8), 4399-4414. (15 pages).

Francisco HA, Rola AC. 2004. Realities of watershed management in the Philippines: Synthesis of case studies. Discussion Paper Series No. 24. Philippines Institute for Development Studies, (22 pages).

Gajbhiye S, Sharma SK, Meshram C. 2014. Prioritization of watershed through sediment yield index using RS and GIS approach. International Journal UE Service Science Technology 7(6), 47-60. (13 pages).

Gottschalk LC. 1964. Reservoir Sedimentation. In: Chow, V.T., Ed., Handbook of Applied Hydrology, mc Graw Hill Book Company, New York.

Gumma MK, Birhanu BZ, Mohammed IA, Tabo R, Whitbread AM. 2016. Prioritization of watersheds across Mali using remote sensing data and GIS techniques for agricultural development planning. Water, 8(260): 1-17. (17 pages).

Horton RE. 1932. Drainage basin characteristics. Transactions of the American Geophysical Unions 13(1), 350-361. (11 pages).

Horton RE. 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: a hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of American Bulletin 5, 275-370. (95 pages).

INREMP. 2018. Integrated Natural Resources and Environmental Management Project Rehabilitation of New Eden, Concepcion Access Road and Foot Trail in Pangantucan, Bukidnon. Initial Environmental Examination. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org.

Iqbal M, Haroon S, Bhat FA. 2012. Watershed-level of morphometric analysis of Dudhganga catchment, Kashmir valley, India, using Geographical Information System. International Journal of Current Research 4(12), 410-416. (6 pages).

Iqbal M, Sajjad H, Bhat FA. 2013. Morphometric Analysis of Shaliganga Sub Catchment, Kashmir Valley, India Using Geographical Information System. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology 4(1), 10-21. (11 pages).

Iqbal M, Sajjad H. 2014. Watershed Prioritization using Morphometric and Land Use/Land Cover Parameters of Dudhganga Catchment Kashmir Valley India using Spatial Technology. Journal of Geophysical Remote Sensing 3(1), 115-128. (13 pages).

Iqbaluddin T, Ali SA. 1984. Photocharacters of Vindhyan Sedimentaries in parts of Chittorgarh District, Rajasthan. Journal Indian Society of Remote Sensing 12(2), 27-32. (5 pages).

Javed A, Khanday MY, Ahmed R. 2009. Prioritization of Sub-watersheds based on Morphometric and Land Use Analysis using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. Journal Indian Society of Remote Sensing 37(1), 261-274. (13 pages).

Javed A, Khanday MY, Rais S. 2011. Watershed Prioritization Using Morphometric and Land Use/Land Cover Parameters: A Remote Sensing and GIS Based Approach. Journal Geological Society of India 78(1), 63-75. (12 pages).

Javier, JA. 1999. Watershed management policies and institutional mechanics: A critical review. J. Philippines Develop 47(1), 77-100. (24 pages).Kadam AK, Umrikar, BN, Sankhua RN. 2016. Geomorphometric characterization and prioritization of watershed from semi-arid region, India for green growth potential. Journal of Environment Research Development 11(02), 417-432. (15 pages).

Kasturirangan K, Aravamudan R, Deekshatulu BL, Joseph G, Chandrasekhar MG. 1996. Indian remote sensing satellite IRS IC. The beginning of new era. Current Science 70(1), 495-500. (5 pages).

Ket-ord R, Tangtham N, Udomchoke V. 2013. Synthesizing drainage morphology of tectonic watershed in Upper Ing watershed (Kwan Phayao Wetland Watershed). Modern Applied Science 7(1), 13-27. (14 pages).

Lasco RD, Cruz RVO, Pulhin JM, Pulhin FB. 2010. Assessing climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: The case of the Pantabangan-Carranglan Watershed. World Agroforestry Centre and College of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of the Philippines Los Baños. (95 pages).

Londhe S, Nathawa MS, Subudhi AP. 2010. Erosion susceptibility zoning and prioritization of mini watersheds using geomatics approach. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences 1(3), 511-528. (17 pages).

López Trigal L. 2015. Dictionary of applied and professional geography. Terminology of analysis, planning and territory management. University of Leon. Retrieved from. https://www.researchgate.net

Mahadevaiah T, Narendra BK. 2014. Prioritizing subwatershed from drainage morphometric parameters for erosion studies in Chitravathi watershed, Chickballapur District, Karnataka. National Environment and Pollution Technology 13(2), 297-302. (5 pages).

Melton M. 1957. An Analysis of the Relations Among Elements of Climate, Surface Properties and Geomorphology. Department of Geology, Columbia University, Technical Report, 11, Project NR 389-042. Office of Navy Research, New York.

Meshram SG, Sharma SK. 2017. Prioritization of watershed through morphometric parameters: a PCA-based approach. Applied Water Science 7(1), 1505-1519.

Miller VC. 1953. A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Varginia and Tennessee, Project NR 389042, Tech Rept 3., Columbia University, Department of Geology, ONR, Geography Branch, New York. Retrieved from.

Mishra SK, Gajbhiye S, Pandey A. 2013. Estimation of design runoff CN for Narmada watersheds. Journal of Applied Water Engineering and Research 1(1), 69-79. (10 pages).

Nag SK. 1998. Morphometric analysis using remote sensing techniques in the Chaka sub-basin Purulia district, West Bengal. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing 26(1-2), 69-76. (7 pages).

Nageswara R, Swarna L, Arun K, Hari K. 2010. Morphometric analysis of Gostani River basin in Andhra Pradesh State, India using spatial information technology. International Journal of Geomatics Geosciences 1(2), 179-187. (8 pages).

NAMRIA. 2018. Land Cover/Land Use Changes (LC/LUC) and Its Impacts on Environment in South/Southeast Asia – International Regional Science Meeting. May 30, 2018 Manila, Philippines. Retrieved from https://lcluc.umd.edu/.

Nautiyal MD. 1994. Morphometric analysis of a drainage basin using arial photographs: a case study of Khairkuli basin District Deharadun. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing 22(4), 251-262.

Nookaratnam K, Srivastava YK, Venkateswarao V, Amminedu E, Murthy KSR 2005. Check dam positioning by prioritization of micro-watersheds using SYI model and morphometric analysis -Remote sensing and GIS perspective. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing 33(1), 25-28. (3 pages).

Obi Reddy GE, Maji AK, Gajbhiye KS. 2002. A GIS for morphometric analysis of drainage basins. GIS lndia 4(11), 9-14. (5 pages).

Pandey A, Chowdary VM, Mal BC. 2007. Identification of critical erosion prone areas in the small agricultural watershed using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resource. Management 21(4), 729-746.

Patton PC, Baker, VR. 1976. Morphometry and floods in small drainage basins subject to diverse hydrogeomorphic controls. Water Resources Research 12(5), 941-952. (11 pages).

Praus P, 2005. Water quality assessment using SVD-based principal component analysis of hydrogeological data. Water SA 31, 417-422. (5 pages).

Puno GR, Puno RCC. 2019. Watershed conservation prioritization using geomorphometric and land use-land cover parameters. Global Journal of Environment Science Management 5(3), 279-294. (15 pages).

Rama VA, 2014. Drainage basin analysis for characterization of 3rd order watersheds using geographic information system (GIS) and ASTER data. Journal of Geomantic 8(2), 200-210. (10 pages).

Saxena RK, Verma KS, Chary GR, Srivastava R, Barthwal AK. 2000. IRS-1C Data application in watershed characterization and management. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21(17), 3197-3208. (11 pages).

Schumn SA. 1956. Evaluation of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersy. Geological Society of American Bulletin 7(5), 597-646.

Sharma IP, Saxena RK, Nagaraju MSS, Srivastava R, Jagdish P, Sunii K, Barthwal AK. 2004. Utilization of remote sensing data for characterization of land resources of Khursapar village, Nagpur district, Maharashtra. Annual Convention and National Symposium, pp.198-199. Retrieved from.

Singh P, Thakur J, Singh UC. 2013. Morphometric analysis of Morar River Basin, Madhya Pradesh, India, using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Environment Earth Sciences 68(7), 1967-1977.

Singh S, Singh MC. 1997. Morphometric analysis of Kanhar river basin. National Geographical Journal of lndia 7(6), 31-43. (12 pages).

Srivastava R, Saxena RK. 2004. Technique of largescale soil mapping in basaltic terrain using satellite remote sensing data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25(4), 679-688. (9 pages).

Strahler AN. 1964. Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks, In VT Chow (ed), Handbook of Applied Hydrology.mcGraw Hill Book Company, New York, Section 4-11. Retrieved from https://www.scirp.org/.

Suji VR, Sheeja RV, Karuppasamy S. 2015. Prioritization using Morphometric Analysis and Land use/Land Cover Parameters for Vazhichal Watershed using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. International Journal for Innovative Research in Science and Technology 2(1), 61-68. (7 pages).

Suresh M, Sudhakar S, Tiwari KN, Chowdary VM. 2004. Prioritization of the watershed using morphometric parameters and assessment of surface water potential using remote sensing. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing 32(3), 249-259.

Vittala S, Govindaiah S, Honne GH. 2004. Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in the Pavagada area of Tumkur district, South India using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing 32(4), 351-362. (11 pages).

Waiker ML, Nilawar P. 2014. Morphometric Analysis of a Drainage Basin Using Geographical Information System: A Case study. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research 2(1), 179-184. (5 pages).

Withanage NS, Dayawansa NDK, De Silva RP. 2014. Morphometric Analysis of the Gal Oya River Basin Using Spatial Data Derived from GIS. Tropical Agricultural Research 26(1), 175-188. (13 pages).