International network for natural sciences – research journal
  • mendeley icon
  • linkedin icon
  • google plus icon
  • twitter icon
  • google scholar icon
  • facebook icon

Weediness potential of AVP1 GM sugarcane

By: Farheen Bhatti, Shaheen Asad, Muhammad Asif

Key Words: GM AVP1 Sugarcane, Weediness, Weeds, Rumex obtusifolius, Cyperus rotundus, Chenopodium album.

J. Bio. Env. Sci. 13(6), 89-98, December 2018.

Certification: jbes 2018 0087 [Generate Certificate]


The era of transgenic crops has set both unprecedented improvements in crop productivity and raised concerns about their adoption of GM crops. Assessment of weediness potential is a significant aspect of GM crop biosafety evaluations prior to commercialization as GM plants with novel traits might increase competitiveness/weediness. GM sugarcane plants over-expressing the AVP1 gene which confers drought tolerance were tested under controlled conditions. A field experiment comparing GM and non-GM sugarcane cultivars under normal irrigated conditions were conducted to assess growth as a measure of the potential weediness of GM AVP1 sugarcane. Different biological parameters were evaluated such as fresh and dry biomass of leaves and roots, plant height, leaf area, Brix content, cane length, number of canes, leaves and tillers. Data collected at both the tillering stage and at maturity didn’t show any significant variation related to weediness attributes due to genetic modification of AVP1 sugarcane. Parallel to this experiment the competitiveness of AVP1 GM sugarcane against the most prevalent naturally occurring weeds were assessed at the tillering stage of the crop. Crop growth was measured under weed infestation and weed-free conditions. Weed infestation in the sugarcane field significantly reduced the no. of tillers up to 27.9%, the plant height by 18.9% and fresh and dry above-ground biomass up to 12.3 and 12.0% respectively but there was no significant difference between GM AVP1 and non-GM sugarcane. In conclusion, AVP1 GM sugarcane didn’t behave differently to its non-GM comparator in both experimental situations indicating no evidence of an increase in weediness potential.

| Views 12 |

Weediness potential of AVP1 GM sugarcane

Bonnett G, Berding N, Morgan T, Fitzgerald P. 2007. Implementation of genetically modified sugarcane-the need for a better understanding of sexual reproduction. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 29, 258-266.

Bonnett G, Nowak E, Olivares-Villegas J, Berding N, Morgan T, Aitken KS. 2008. Identifying the risks of transgene escape from sugarcane crops to related species, with particular reference to Saccharum spontaneum in Australia. Tropical Plant Biology 1, 58-71.

Bonnett G, Olivares-Villegas J, Berding N, Morgan T. 2011. Sugarcane sexual reproduction in a commercial environment: research to underpin regulatory decisions for genetically modified sugarcane. International Sugar Journal 113, 214.

Castro-Nava S, Huerta AJ, Plácido-de la Cruz JM, Mireles-Rodríguez E. 2016. Leaf growth and canopy development of three sugarcane genotypes under high temperature rainfed conditions in Northeastern Mexico. International Journal of Agronomy 2016, 1-7.

Cheavegatti-Gianotto A, de Abreu HMC, Arruda P, Bespalhok Filho JC, Burnquist WL, Creste S, di Ciero L, Ferro JA, de Oliveira Figueira AV, de Sousa Filgueiras T. 2011. Sugarcane (Saccharum X officinarum): a reference study for the regulation of genetically modified cultivars in Brazil. Tropical Plant Biology 4, 62-89.

da Silva VSG, de Oliveira MW, Oliveira TBA, Mantovanelli BC, da Silva AC, icero, Soares ANR, Clemente PRA. 2017. Leaf area of sugarcane varieties and their correlation with biomass productivity in three cycles. African Journal of Agricultural Research 12, 459-466.

Davison J, Ammann K. 2017. New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology. GM Crops & Food 8, 13-34.

Eastick R. 2002. Evaluation of the potential weediness of transgenic cotton in northern Australia: CSIRO Plant Industry.

Eastick RJ, Hearnden MN. 2006. Potential for weediness of Bt cotton in northern Australia. Weed Science 54, 1142-1151.

Hanin M, Ebel C, Ngom M, Laplaze L, Masmoudi K. 2016. New insights on plant salt tolerance mechanisms and their potential use for breeding. Frontiers in Plant Science 7.

Hermann E, Câmara G. 1999. Um método simples para estimar a área foliar de cana-de-açúcar. Revista da STAB 17, 32-34.

ISAAA. 2017. Brazil approves GM sugarcane for commercial use. . Crop Biotech Updates.

James C. 2013. ISAAA Brief 46-2013: Executive Summary. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2013.

James C. 2016. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2014. ISAAA Brief No. 49. ISAAA: Ithaca (NY).

Khan IA, Raza G, Ismail M, Raza S, Seema N, Yasmine S. 2015. Assessment of contender sugarcane clones for morphological traits and biotic tolerance under agro-climatic conditions of tando jam. Pakistan Journal of Botany 47, 43-48.

Leidi EO, Barragán V, Rubio L, ElHamdaoui A, Ruiz MT, Cubero B, Fernández JA, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM, Quintero FJ. 2010. The AtNHX1 exchanger mediates potassium compartmentation in vacuoles of transgenic tomato. The Plant Journal 61, 495-506.

Marwat KB, Hashim S, Ali H. 2010. Weed management: a case study from north-west Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42, 341-353.

Mitchell H. 2011. Regulation of genetically modified (GM) Sugar cane in Australia. Proc Aust Soc SugarcaneTechnol 33, 1-8.

Office of the Gene Technology Regulator – Australia (OGTR). 2014. Risk Assessment and Risk Management Plan for Commercial Release of Cotton Genetically Modified for Insect Resistance and Herbicide Tolerance (Bollgard®III and Bollgard®III x Roundup Ready Flex®).

Office of the gene technology regulator (OGTR). 2004. Field Trials to Evaluate Genetically Modified Sugarcane Lines Expressing Sucrose Isomerase. The University of Queensland. Application for licence for dealings involving an intentional release into the environment, DIR 051/2004.

Olivares-Villegas J, Berding N, Morgan T, Bennett G. 2010. A Research Framework for Informing the Regulated Deployment of Genetically Modified Sugarcane: Identifying Potential Risks from Sexual Reproduction of Sugarcane in Commercial Fields. ISSCT XXVII Conference Veracruz, Mexico. in press.

Orroño DI, Vesprini F. 2018. Directives and requirements for genetically modified (GM) crop regulation in Argentina. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 18, 301-308.

Pierre J, Rae A, Bonnett G. 2014. Abiotic limits for germination of sugarcane seed in relation to environmental spread. Tropical plant biology 7, 100-110.

Pierre JS, Perroux J, Whan A, Rae AL, Bonnett GD. 2015. Poor fertility, short longevity, and low abundance in the soil seed bank limit volunteer sugarcane from seed. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 3, 83.

Raybould A. 2010. The bucket and the searchlight: formulating and testing risk hypotheses about the weediness and invasiveness potential of transgenic crops. Environmental Biosafety Research 9, 123-133.

Raybould A, Quemada H, Romeis J. 2014. Introduction to ISBGMO12: biosafety research past, present and future. Transgenic Research 23, 911-914.

Raza G, Ali K, Ashraf MY, Mansoor S, Javid M, Asad S. 2016. Overexpression of an H+-PPase gene from Arabidopsis in sugarcane improvesdrought tolerance, plant growth, and photosynthetic responses. Turkish Journal of Biology 40, 109-119.

Sarafian V, Kim Y, Poole RJ, Rea PA. 1992. Molecular cloning and sequence of cDNA encoding the pyrophosphate-energized vacuolar membrane proton pump of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 89, 1775-1779.

USDA. 2014. Weed Risk Assessments for Zea mays L. subsp. mays (Poaceae) – Maize and Genetically Engineered HerbicideResistant Maize. United States Department of Agriculture. (Last accessed August 8, 2014.).

Zafar M, Tanveer A, Cheema ZA, Ashraf M. 2010. Weed-crop competition effects on growth and yield of sugarcane planted using two methods. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42, 815-823.

Farheen Bhatti, Shaheen Asad, Muhammad Asif.
Weediness potential of AVP1 GM sugarcane.
J. Bio. Env. Sci. 13(6), 89-98, December 2018.
Copyright © 2018
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
innspub logo
english language editing
    Publish Your Article
    Submit Your Article
Email Update