Assessment of carbon sequestration in species (Salsola laricina and Poa sinaica) under different treatments of vegetation management (Case study: Ghazvin, Iran)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/10/2014
Views (592)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Assessment of carbon sequestration in species (Salsola laricina and Poa sinaica) under different treatments of vegetation management (Case study: Ghazvin, Iran)

Mojtaba Akhavan Armaki, Bagher Khaleghi
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 5(4), 540-547, October 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Rangelands comprise the large parts of Iran as a steppic area. Ghazvin, as area index of steppic area, was selected under three sites including long-term exclosure, medium-term exclosure, and grazable area due to the capability of carbon dioxide’s sequestration of dominated species. Canopy cover’s percentage of two dominated species (Salsola laricina and Poa sinaica) was determined via establishing of random 1 square meter plot. The sampling of above and below ground biomass style was obtained by complete random. After determination of ash percentage in the laboratory; conversion ratio of plant biomass to organic carbon was calculated by ignition method. Results of the paired t-test showed that the amount of carbon sequestration in above ground and underground biomass of Salsola laricina and Poa sinaica is different in three regions. It, of course, has not any difference between under and surface ground’s biomass of Salsola laricina in long-term exclosure. The independent t-test results indicate differences between underground biomass corresponding each other in the studied sites. Carbon sequestration in the Poa sinaica was totally more than Salsola laricina Altogether, the average sequestration of the long-term exclosure was 5.842gr/m², the medium-term exclosure was 4.115gr/m², and grazable area was 5.975gr/m² so that there is not valuable statistical difference in terms of total amount of carbon sequestration to three sites.

Abdi N, Maddah arefi H, Zahedi amiri GH. 2010. Estimation of carbon sequestration in Astragalus rangeland of Markazi province (case study; Malmire rangeland in Shazand region). Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research. 15(2), 269-282. (In Persian).

Akbarzadeh M, Mirhaji T. 2006. Investigating and comparing some usual rangeland condition monitoring methods suited with site potential in some climatic ragions of Tehran province. Iranian J.ofRange and Desert Research. 13(3), 222-235. (In Persian).

Birdsey R, Heath I, Williams D. 2009. Estimation of carbon budget model of the United State forest sectore, advences in terrestrial ecosystem carbon inventoru, Measurements and Monitoring, conferences in Raleigh. North Carolina, October 35, 2000. 51-59.

Bordbar Sk, Mortazvi gahromi SM. 2006. Carbon sequestration potential of Eucalyptus camaldolensis Dehnh. And Acacia salicina Lindl. Plantation in western areas of Fars province. Iranian J. of Construction and Research. 70(1), 95-103. (In Persian).

Eskandari N, Alizadeh A, Mahdavi F. 2008. Range management policies in Iran. Poneh publications.Pp: 190. (In Persian).

Frozeh MR, Heshmati A, Ghanbariyan Gh A, Mesbah SH. 2008.  Comparison  potential  carbon sequestration Helianthemum lippii (Pers.), Dendrostelleralessertii (Van Tigeh.) And Artemisia sieberiBesser in arid rangeland of Iran (case study: Garbayegan Fasa in Fars province). Iranian journal of Environmen Science. 46(2), 65-72 (In Persian).

Gharedaghi H, Jalili A. 1999. Comparison and influences of grazing and exclosure on plant composion in the steppic rangeland Rudshur Saveh, Mrkazi province. Iranian J. of Forest and Range. 43(2), 28-34 (In Persian).

Hashimoto M, Nose T, Muriguchi Y. 2002. Wood product, potential carbon sequestration and impact on net carbon emissions of industrialized countries. J.ofEnvironmental Science & Policy. 5, 183-193.

Hill MJ, Braaten R, Mckeon GM. 2003. A scenario calculator for effect of grazing land management on carbon stocks in Australian rangelands. Environmental Modeling & Software, Vol 18, Issue 7, September 2003, 627-644.

Lal R. 2004. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change, Geoderma, 123, 1-22.

Mahdavi M, Arzani H, Farahpoor M, Malekpoor B, Joury MH, Abedi M. 2007. Efficiency investigation of Rangeland inventory with Rangeland healthe method. Gorgan J. of agricultural sciences and natural resources. 14 (1), 158-173, special issue. (In Persian)

Mesdaghi M. 2010. Range management in Iran. Astane Ghoudse Razavi publications.Pp: 333. (In Persian)

Mortenson M, Shuman GE. 2002. Carbon sequestration in rangeland interseeded with yellow-flowering Journal of Rangeland Science, 2010, Vol. 1, No. 1 M. Alizadeh, et al. / 45Alfalfa(Medicago sativa subsp Falcata).USDA Symposium on Natural Resource Management to offset greenhouse gas emission in University of Wyoming.

Muller D, Ellenberg H. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. New York: john Wiley & sons. 574 p.

Taheri M. 1998.Value of ecological services and natural capital. Estimated annual value of renewable natural resources in forest, rangeland and watershed organization of Iran. Council forest, rangeland and soil.

UNDP. 2009. Carbon Sequestration in the Desertifed Rangelands of Hossein Abad, Through Community Based Management, Program Coordination, 1-7.

William E. 2002. Carbon dioxid fluxes in a semi arid environment with high carbonate soils. J. of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 116, 91-102.

Yong ZS, lZ Ha, Tong HZ. 2003. Influences of grazing and exclosure on carbon sequestration in degraded sandy grassland, Inner Mongolia, North China., J. of Agricultural Research., 46(4), 321-328.

Zhao HL, Zhao EX, Zhang TH. 2008. Causes processes and countermeasures of desertification in the interlocked agro-pastoral area of north China. J. of Desert Research. 20(1), 22-28. (In China with English abstract).

Related Articles

Agroforestry in woody-encroached Sub-Saharan savannas: Transforming ecological challenges into sustainable opportunities

Yao Anicet Gervais Kouamé, Pabo Quévin Oula, Kouamé Fulgence Koffi, Ollo Sib, Adama Bakayoko, Karidia Traoré, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 10-22, September 2025.

Extreme rainfall variability and trends in the district of Ouedeme, municipality of Glazoue (Benin)

Koumassi Dègla Hervé, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 1-9, September 2025.

Heterosis breeding, general and specific combining ability and stability studies in pearl millet: Current trends

Ram Avtar, Krishan Pal, Kavita Rani, Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Mahendra Kumar Yadav, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 117-124, August 2025.

Combining ability, heterosis and stability for yield and fibre quality traits in cotton: Breeding approaches and future prospects

Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Krishan Pal, R. P. Saharan, Ram Avtar, Mahendra Kumar Yadav, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 109-116, August 2025.

Bridging the COPD awareness gap in marginalized populations: Findings from a multicentre study in Khalilabad, Sant Kabir Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India

Anupam Pati Tripathi, Jigyasa Pandey, Sakshi Singh, Smita Pathak, Dinesh Chaudhary, Alfiya Mashii, Farheen Fatima, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 97-108, August 2025.

Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of Pleurotus citrinopileatus Singer and Pleurotus sajor-caju (Fr.) Singer

P. Maheswari, P. Madhanraj, V. Ambikapathy, P. Prakash, A. Panneerselvam, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 90-96, August 2025.

Mangrove abundance, diversity, and productivity in effluent-rich estuarine portion of Butuanon River, Mandaue City, Cebu

John Michael B. Genterolizo, Miguelito A. Ruelan, Laarlyn N. Abalos, Kathleen Kay M. Buendia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 77-89, August 2025.

Cytogenetic and pathological investigations in maize × teosinte hybrids: Chromosome behaviour, spore identification, and inheritance of maydis leaf blight resistance

Krishan Pal, Ravi Kishan Soni, Devraj, Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Ram Avtar, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 70-76, August 2025.