Estimation of shoot and root biomass with their C, N, P, K and S contents of eight different rice varieties at harvesting stage

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2016
Views (831)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Estimation of shoot and root biomass with their C, N, P, K and S contents of eight different rice varieties at harvesting stage

Md. Mahmud Hassan, Musharraf Hossain Mian, G. M. Murshid Alam
Int. J. Biosci. 9(6), 137-144, December 2016.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2016; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Hybrid hira, Hybrid tia, BRRI dhan28, BRRI dhan29, Binadhan-5, Binadhan-7, Laphadhan and Pijamdhan were grown in a medium high land soil (silt loam, aeric heplaquept) during boro season (crop period: January to June 2011). Shoot and root biomass and their C, N, P, K and S contents at full maturity were determined to assess their potentiality for using as organic residues for the maintenance of soil organic matter. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Completely Block Design (RCBD) with three replications for each of eight rice varieties having unit plot size 4m×2.5m. Air dry shoot biomass obtained for Hybrid hira, Hybrid tia, BRRI dhan28, BRRI dhan29, Binadhan-5, Binadhan-7, Laphadhan and Pijamdhan were 5.28, 4.82, 4.10, 4.29, 4.98, 3.97, 3.69 and 4.28 t ha-1 respectively and root biomass were 1.20, 0.91, 0.99, 1.11, 1.33, 0.78, 0.76 and 0.90 t ha-1, respectively. Organic carbon content in the shoots were 2.97, 2.43, 2.44, 2.54, 2.72, 2.10, 2.04 and 2.73 t ha-1, respectively and roots were 0.52, 0.46, 0.49, 0.51, 0.61, 0.38, 0.40 and 0.41t ha-1 respectively. The C-N ratios for the shoots were found to be 150.6, 170.3, 361.0, 268.9, 192.8, 246.8, 203.4 and 315.2; and for the roots were 112.8, 89.7, 114.2, 68.7, 89.4, 108.6, 187.8 and 73.6, respectively. The PKS contents in both shoots and roots also estimate. It may be inferred that both shoot and root residues may play a significant role in organic manuring. Particular attention should be given for assessing the contribution of the root biomass.

Ameta GS, Singh HG. 2004. Comparative efficiency of neem cake coated prilled urea and splitting N application in wheat production. International Tropical Agriculture 8(3), 189-192.

BBS. 2009. The Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics of Bangladesh Statistic Division Ministry of Planning, Government of Peoples Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka. 129-132 P.

Black CA. 1965. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I and II American Society of Agronomy. Inc. Publication Madison, Wisconsin, United State of America. 

Dongarwar UR, Pantakar MN, Pawar WS. 2003. Response of rice different fertility levels. Journal of Soil and Crops 13(1), 102-122.

Gomez KA. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. Second. John Wiley and Sons. New York. 207-215 P.

Oslen SR, Cole CV, Watanable FS, Dean LA. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United State. Depertment of Agriculture. Cire. 929.

Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR. 1989. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part-II (Second Edition). American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Publication, Madison, Wisconsin. United State of America. 501-534 P.

Sarfaraz M, Mehdi, Sadic SM, Hassan G. 2002. Effects of Sulphur on yield and chemical composition of rice .Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 18, 411- 414.

Walkey A, Black IA. 1934. An experiment of degtiareff method for determining soils organic matter and proposed modification for the chronic acid titration method. Soil Science 37, 29-38.

Related Articles

Stabilization of cashew apple juice with chitosan: clarification and microbiological quality

Kokora Aya Philomène*, Coulibaly Adama, Cissé Mohamed, Coulibaly Bintou, Konan N’guessan Ysidor, Godi Henri Marius Biego, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 76-88, August 2026.

Implementation and evaluation of limited face to face classes: basis for adoption of health and safety manual

Christian Jude B. Calunsag*, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 65-75, August 2026.

Baseline characterization of farming systems in the province of Bassitenga in Burkina Faso

Boly Ismaël Ardho*, Traoré Mamadou, Hema Alain Sabiriba, Sory Lallé Daouda, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 54-64, August 2026.

Zootechnical performance and economic profitability of sasso broiler chickens reared under a semi-automatic production system in Burkina Faso

Bernadette Yougbaré*, Arnaud Stéphane Rayangnéwêndé Tapsoba, Fatogoman Téophile Sanou, Clément Kaboré, Amadou Traoré, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 35-44, August 2026.

Factors influencing the use of Mucuna pruriens as food in Benin, West Africa

Yves Boladé Djimba, Janvier Mêlégnonfan Kindossi*, Folachodé Ulrich Gildas Akogou, Ephraïm Olouwafemi Biao, Jacques Agangni, Kokou Mensah Adjangba, Ogouyôm Herbert Iko Afé, Franck Hongbété, Rodrigue V. Cao Diogo, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 19-34, August 2026.

Contribution to the inventorier and establishment of a collection of agricultural entomofauna from the Niayes area of Dakar

Mamecor Faye*, Amy Collé Guèye, Coumba Gning, Lamine Konaté, Mbacké Sembène, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 10-18, August 2026.

Assessment of the trophic ecology and variation in the natural diet of an anuran amphibian species (Afrixalus dorsalis) in the Wetlands of the Ehotilé Islands (Ivory Coast)

Beh Romaric Konate*, Amani Reine Élisabeth Kouadio, Louis César Agou, Enoutchy Fabrice Bouah, N'Guessan Ludovic Yao, Etilé Raphaël N’doua, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 1-9, August 2026.