International network for natural sciences – research journal
  • mendeley icon
  • linkedin icon
  • google plus icon
  • twitter icon
  • google scholar icon
  • facebook icon

Assessing foliar application of chitosan andhumic acid on soil-solution partitioning of Pisum sativum

By: Neelam Manzoor, Afia Zia, Muhammad NaumanAhmad, RahmatUllah, Sahib Alam, Shawana Jalil, Dania Zia

Key Words: Soil Solution, Humic Acid, Metals and Chitosan

Int. J. Biosci. 12(1), 252-265, January 2018.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/12.1.252-265

Certification: ijb 2018 0209 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

An experiment was carried out at Nursery of University of Agriculture Peshawar during 2016-201 for the assessment of foliar application of Chitosan and Humic acid on Soil solution partitioning , so as to see the indirect effects that they put forth on the chemical and biological properties of the soil. Trial was planned in CRD design with three replications. Various combinations of Humic acid (0, 1, 2, 3g.L-1) and Chitosan (0 , 40, 60, 80 mg.L -1). Meteor verity was under consideration during trial. Combinations of Humic acid (0, 1, 2, 3g.L-1) and Chitosan (0, 40, 60, 80 mg. L -1)were under consideration . Three foliar application were done first at vegetative stage (2nd week) second at flowering stage (4th week) and third at pods formation (8th week). . Decrease in Soil pH (6 @ 3g.L-1 HA 40mg.L-1 CHT ), increase in SMN( 57 ml.L-1 @ 2g L-1 HA 40mg.L-1 HA ) and LOI(4.067%) as effected in combination((@CHT 40mg.L-1 and Humic acid @1g.L-1)in post-harvest soil was observed. Soil Solution weekly results for pH showed pH of 5.4 (@3g.L-1 HA and 0mg.L-1 CHA in week 5) ,mg concentration 0f 2.57 ml.L-1 (@ 3g.L-1 HA in week 9), Cu concentration was 0.08 ml.L-1(@ 80mg.L-1CHT in week 12). NO3 result showed concentration of 0.52 ml L-1(@ 3g L-1 HA and 0.15 ml.L-1).C2H3 contributed towards decrease in soil pH in post-Harvest Soil significantly at P≤0.05 however soil solution pH was influenced again by C0H3 mostly after second foliar application ,soil-solution pH was influenced more at HA@3 gL-1,SMN as available NO3 in soil was significantly affected by C3H2 and NO3 in solution phase mineralized more with C0H2,overall HA @2g.L-1released available NO3 in soil solution Partitioning. The effects which HA and CHT put forth on plant growth can be grouped into indirect effects on chemical as well as biological properties of the soil, thus HA and CHT important effect on plant development may be credited to the promoting effects on uptake of some important nutritional status of soil in particularly N, P and K which are needed for the growth of plant .

| Views 49 |

Assessing foliar application of chitosan andhumic acid on soil-solution partitioning of Pisum sativum

Abdel-Mawgoud AMR, Tantawy AS, El-Nemr MA, Sassine YN. 2010. Growth and yield responses of strawberry plants to chitosan application. European Journal of Scientific Research 39(1), 161-168.

Bourion V, Lejeune-Henaut I, Munier-Jolain N, Salon C. 2003. Cold acclimation of winter and spring peas: carbon partitioning as affected by light intensity. Europ. J. Agron. 19, 535-548.

Bittelli M, Flury M, Campbell GS, Nichols EJ. 2001. Reduction of transpiration through foliar application of chitosan. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology 107(3), 167-175.

Mackowiak CL,   Grossl PR, Bugbee BG. 2011.  Beneficial Effects of Humic Acid on Micronutrient Availability to Wheat. Soil Science Society. Published in Soil Science Society of  America .J. 65, 1744–1750.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.1744

Chen B, YG. Zhu. 006. Humic acids increase the phyto-availability of Cd and Pb to wheat plants cultivated in fleshy spiked, contaminated soil. J. Soil and sediments. 6(4), 26-242.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1065/jss2006.08.178.

Clark A. (Ed.) 2007. Managing cover crops profitably. 3rd ed. Sustainable agriculture research and education program handbook series, bk 9. Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education, College Park, MD.

Elzebroek T, Wind K. 2008. Guide to cultivated plants. CAB International, Oxford shire, UK.  Food and Agriculture Organization. 2012. [Online] Available at: (Accessed 24 April 2012). FAO, Rome.

www.faostat.fao.org.

Farouk S, Mosa AA, Taha AA, Ibrahim Heba M, El Gahmery AM. 2011. Protective effect of humic acid and chitosan on radish (Raphanus sativus L. var. sativus) plants subjected to cadmium stress. Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry 7(2), 99-116.

Farouk S, Ghoneem KM, Ali Abeer A. 2008. Induction and expression of systematic resistance to downy mildew disease in cucumber plant by elicitors. Egyptian Journal of Phytopathology 1(2), 95-111.

Ghoname AA, El-Nemr MA, Abdel-Mawgoud AMR, El-Tohamy WA. 2010. Enhancement of sweet pepper crop growth and production by application of biological, organic and nutritional solutions. Research Journal of Agriculture & Biological Science 6(7), 349-355.

Guan Ya-Jing, Jin Hu, Xian-Ju Wang, Chen-Xia Shao. 2009. Seed priming with chitosan improves maize germination and seedling growth in relation to physiological changes under low temperature stress. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B 10(6), 427-433.DO1:

http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ejb.v14i1.2

Hartmann HT, Kofranek AM, Rubatzky VE, Flocker WJ. 1988. Plant science: Growth, development and utilization of cultivated plants. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall Career and Technology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Mac Carthy P, Clapp CE, Malcdm RL,  Bloom PP. 1999. Humic substances in soil and  Crop Sciences. Soil Science society of America, Madison.

Mc Gee R. 2012. USDA-ARS. Personal communication. Murray, G.A. and J.B. Swensen. 1985. Seed yield of Austrian winter field peas intercropped with winter cereals. Agron. J. 77, 913-916.

New N, Chandrkrachang S, Stevens WF. 2004. Application of chitosan in Myanmar’s agriculture sector, in: Proceedings of the Sixth Asia Pacific Chitin and Chitosan Symposium, May 23–26, The National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Nerdi S, Pizzeghello D, renero F, Muscobo A.  1999. Biological activity of humic substances extracted from soil under different vegetation cover. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 30, 621-634.

Rosa CM, Castilhos RMV, Vahl LC, Costa PFP. 2004. Effect of felvic acids on plant growth, root morphology, and macro nutrient uptake by oats. In  Humic substances and soil and water and environment. SRO.PEDRO. Proceedings. 207-210.

Singarvial R, Balasubramanian TN, Govindasamy R. 1993. Effect of humic acid on sesam (Sesamum indicum). Indian Journal of  Agronomy 38, 147-149.

Neelam Manzoor, Afia Zia, Muhammad NaumanAhmad, RahmatUllah, Sahib Alam, Shawana Jalil, Dania Zia.
Assessing foliar application of chitosan andhumic acid on soil-solution partitioning of Pisum sativum.
Int. J. Biosci. 12(1), 252-265, January 2018.
https://innspub.net/ijb/assessing-foliar-application-chitosan-andhumic-acid-soil-solution-partitioning-pisum-sativum/
Copyright © 2018
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
https://innspub.net
brand
innspub logo
english language editing
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Publish Your Article
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Submit Your Article
INNSPUB on FB
Email Update