International network for natural sciences – research journal
  • mendeley icon
  • linkedin icon
  • google plus icon
  • twitter icon
  • google scholar icon
  • facebook icon

Estimation of hybrid vigor for yield and yield related traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon MIll)

By: Adnan Rasheed, Shahoor Ahmed, Ghulam Mustafa Wassan, Abdul Malik Solangi, Muhammad Aamer, Hira Khanzada, Ayaz Ali Keerio, Abdul Qadeer, Israr Ahmed

Key Words: Tomato, Heterosis, Yield

Int. J. Biosci. 12(1), 160-167, January 2018.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/12.1.160-167

Certification: ijb 2018 0198 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Proposed research study was conducted at the experimental field of DHRD, NARC Islamabad to estimate hybrid vigor for yield related traits in tomato. Study was more important to developed indeginious hybrids to compete the exiotic hybrids to meet the demands of locan farmers because seed of exiotic hybrid is very costly. Line x Tester anakysis was used to developed hybrids. Nine parents, 15 F1s were used in experiment. Heterotic analysis depicted that all hybrids were found superior for plant height, no. of flowers cluster-1, no. of fruits cluster-1, plant height, single fruit weight and fruits setting % cluster-1 and some hybrids showed negative heterosis and heterobeltiosis for no. of clusters plant-1, no. of branches plant-1, no. of locules fruit-1 and yield plant-1. For days to 50% flowering and days to 50% fruits maturity most F1s were superior. For no. of flowers cluster-1Naginax 17905 and Nagina x BSX-935 for no. of fruits cluster-1 Naginax BSX-935 and Riogrande xBSX-935, for single fruit weight, Riogrande x Continental and Riogrande x 17905, for fruit sett % cluster-1 Roma x BSX-935 and Pakit x BSX-935 were superior and heterosis could be exploited in these F1s for said traits. On the bais of key findings it was concluded that Nagina x 17905 (152.52*, 120.58*), Roma x 17905 (125.14**, 115.05**) and RomaxBSX-935 (123.10**, 77.21**) expressed highly significant heterosis and heterobeltiosis for yield plant-1 as these hybrids could be used in future breeding programme.

| Views 140 |

Estimation of hybrid vigor for yield and yield related traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon MIll)

Aguiar PA, Penna JCB, Freire EC, Melo LC.  2007. Diallel analysis of upland cotton cultivars. Journal of Crop Breeding and Biotechnology 7, 353-359.

Ahmad SU, Shaha HK, Sharfuddin AFM. 1988. Study of heterosis and correlation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon Mill.).Thailand Journal of Agriculture Sciences 21, 117-123.

Ahmad SA, Quamruzzaman KM, Islam MR. 2011. Estimation of heterosis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon Mill.). Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 36, 521-527.

Amin ES, Abid MM, Maksoud E, Rahim AM. 2001. Genetic studies on F1 generation and genetic parameters associated with it in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Journal of Agricultural Sciences Man University 26, 3667-3675.

Anbu SC, Muthukrishna R, Irulappan I. 1976. Line x tester analysis in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). South Indian Horticulture2, 49-53.

Bhatt RP, Biswas VR, Kumar N. 2001. Heterosis, combining ability, genetics for vitamin C, total soluble solids and yield in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) at 1700 m altitude. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 7, 71-75.

Chattopadhyay A,  Paul A. 2012. Studies on heterosis for different fruit quality parameters in tomato. International Journal of Agricultural Environment and Biotechnology4, 405-409.

Chaudhary DRMalhotra SK. 2001. Studies on hybrid vigor in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon Mill.). Indial Journal of Agricultural Research 35, 176-180.

Courtney WH, Peirce LC. 1979. Parent selection in tomato based on morpho-physiological traits. Horticultural Sciences 14, 458-461.

FAOSTAT. 2015. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAOSTAT Database (Last accessed on 10 October 2016).

Gazar T, Sayed HE, Zanata O. 2002. Inheritance of vegetative and fruit quality of some tomato crosses in late summer season. Journal of Agricultural Science Mansoura University 27, 5473-5484.

Gul RH, Rahman U, Khalil IH,  Shah SM, Ghafoor A. 2011. Estimate of heterosis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon Mill.). Bangladesh Journal of Agriccultural Research 36, 521-527.

Ahmad H, Mustafa K. 2002. Study of heterosis for yield and quality traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon Mill.). International Journal of Science and Nature 23, 421-4428.

 Hayes HK, Immer IR,  Smith DC. 1956. Methods of plant breeding. New York, McGraw Hill Company Inc, 535-442 P.

Hedrick UP, Booth NO. 1968.  Mendelian characters in tomato. American Society of Horticulture Science 5, 19-24.

Josh A, Thakur MC. 2003. Exploitation of heterosis for yield and yield contributing traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon Mill.). Progressive Horticulture 35, 64-68.

Kurian A, Peter KV, Rajan S. 2001. Heterosis for yield components and fruit characters in tomato. Journal of Tropical Agriculture 39, 5-8.

Larson RE, Currence TM. 1944. The extent of hybrid vigor in FI and F2 generation of tomato crosses with particular reference to early yield, total yield and fruit size. Journal of Tropical Agriculture 164, 11-32.

MFAL. 2015. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, Islamabad, Html. (Last accessed on 20 September 2016).

www.paktive.com/mfal.265EB23.

Mirshamssi A, Farsi M, Shahriari F, Nemati H.  2006. Estimation of heterosis and combining ability for yield components and crossing method. Agricultural Science and Technilogy 20, 3-12.

Popova KM, Petrova N. 1979. Some manifestation of heterosis in the FI of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon Mill.) Journal of Srilankan Agriculture12, 307-314.

Rahmani GL, Rahman H, Khalil IH, Shah SMS, Ghafoor A. 2010. Heterosis for flower and fruit traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon Mill.). African Journal of Biotechnology 9, 4144-4151.

Ramzan A,  Khan TN,  Nawab N, Hina A, Noor T, Jillani G. 2014. Estimation of genetic components in f1 hybrids and their parents in determinate tomato (Solanum lycopersicon Mill.). Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research 521, 65-75.

Rani I, Veeraragavathatham D, Sanjutha D. 2008. Studies on correlation and path coefficient analysis on yield attributes in root knot nematodes resistant F1 hybrids of tomato. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 4, 287-295.

Sekhar L, Prakash BG, Salimath PM, Patil AA. 2010. Implications of heterosis and combining ability among productive Single cross hybrids in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon Mill). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1, 706-711.

Singh RK, Singh VK. 1993. Heterosis breeding in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon Mill.). Annals of Agricultural Research 14, 416-420.

Souza LMD, Melo PCT, Luders RR, Melo AM. 2012. Correlations between yield and fruit quality characteristics of fresh market tomatoes. Horticulture Brasileira 30, 627-631.

Turner JHJ. 1953. Agronomy Journal 43, 92-97.

Wang L,  Wang M,  Ying S, Shopingand T. 1998. Genetic and correlation studies on quantitative characters in processing tomato. Advances in Horticulture 2, 378-383.

Williams W,  Gilbert M. 1960. Heterosis and inheritance of yield in tomato. International Journal of Heredity and Nature14, 113-149.

Yordanov M. 1983. Heterosis in tomato. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Genetics 6, 189- 219.

Adnan Rasheed, Shahoor Ahmed, Ghulam Mustafa Wassan, Abdul Malik Solangi, Muhammad Aamer, Hira Khanzada, Ayaz Ali Keerio, Abdul Qadeer, Israr Ahmed.
Estimation of hybrid vigor for yield and yield related traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon MIll).
Int. J. Biosci. 12(1), 160-167, January 2018.
https://innspub.net/ijb/estimation-hybrid-vigor-yield-yield-related-traits-tomato-solanum-lycopersicon-mill/
Copyright © 2018
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
https://innspub.net
brand
innspub logo
english language editing
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Publish Your Article
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Submit Your Article
INNSPUB on FB
Email Update