Treatment of madre de cacao (Gliricidia sepium Jacq.) forage and crude protein utilization in native goats (Capra hircus Linn.)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2020
Views (361) Download (16)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Treatment of madre de cacao (Gliricidia sepium Jacq.) forage and crude protein utilization in native goats (Capra hircus Linn.)

Hershey P. Mondejar, Lolito Bestil
Int. J. Biosci.16( 6), 220-226, June 2020.
Certificate: IJB 2020 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

High levels of plant secondary metabolites, including tannins, are often considered important factors limiting the use of tropical trees and shrubs for small ruminants. Thus, an experiment was conducted to determine the effectivity of potential methods of ameliorating high-tannin forage (Gliricidia sepium Jacq. Steud.) by sun-drying and calcium hydroxide treatment on the intake, and digestibility of dry matter (DM) and crude protein in native goats. An in vivo digestibility trial for twenty-two (22) days was conducted. Twelve (12) Philippine native goats were randomly distributed to the three treatment diets laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with an age-sex combination as the basis for blocking. Block 1 consisted of young male goats, block 2 young, female goats, block 3, older male goats, and block 4, older female goats.  The dietary treatments were: T0 (fresh form), T1 (sun-dried), and T2 (calcium hydroxide-treated) Gliricidia sepium forage. Sun-drying (T1) significantly increased dry matter intake and digestibility and crude protein intake and digestibility of the forage. Calcium-hydroxide treatment (T2) did not have any significant effects in improving the nutrients intake and digestibility of the fresh form of the forage. Sun-drying inactivates the detrimental effects of tannin making the protein available for animal use and thereby improving the nutritive value of the feeds.

VIEWS 21

Alam MR, Kabir A, Amin MR, McNeill DM. 2005.The effect of calcium hydroxide treatment on the nutritive and feeding value of Albizia procera for growing goats. Animal Feed Science and Technology 122, 135–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.04.008

Ben Salem H, Adibi S, Makkar HPS, Nefzaoui A. 2005a. Wood ash treatment, a cost-effective way to deactivate tannins in Acacia cyanophylla Lindl. Foliage and to improve digestion by Barbarine sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 122, 93–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.04.013

Bestil LC, Espina DM. 1992. DM intake and digestibility of   selected forage legumes in fresh and dried forages from some adaptable legume species.    Philippine Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science 18(4), 137-139.

Bueno ICS, Dorinha MSS, Vitti DMS,  Louvandini H, Abdalla AL. 2008.A new approach for in vitro bioassay to measure tannin biological effects based on a gas production technique. Animal Feed Science and Technology 141, 153–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.011

Bhat TK, Kannan A, Birbal Singh, Sharma OP. 2013. Value addition of feed and fodder by alleviating the antinutritional effects of tannins. Agricultural Research 2, 189–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40003-013-0066-6

Makkar HPS, Singh B. 1991. Effect of drying conditions on tannin, fibre and lignin levels in mature oak (Quercus incana) leaves. Journal of Science and Food Agriculture 54, 323–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740540302

Makkar HPS, Blummel M, Borowy NK,  Becker K. 1993. Gravimetric determination of tannins and their correlations with chemical and protein precipitation methods. Journal of Science and Food Agriculture 61, 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740610205

Makkar HPS, Becker K. 1996. Effect of pH, temperature, and time on inactivation of tannins and possible implications in detannification studies. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 44(5), 1291–1295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf9506287

Dias AM, Itavo LCV, Damasceno JC, Tadeu dos Santos G, Itavo CCBF, Da Silva FF, Noguueira E, Soares CM. 2011.Sugar cane treated with calcium hydroxide in diet for cattle: intake, digestibility of nutrients and ingestive behaviour. Zootechniques 40, 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1590/S151635982011000800025 

Mueller-Harvey I. 2006. Review Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 86, 2010–2037. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2577

Silanikove N, Perevolotsky FD, Provenza FD. 2001. Use of tannin-binding chemicals Assay for tannins and their negative postingestive effects in ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 91, 69-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0377-8401(01)00234-6

Smith AH, Zoetendal E, Mackie RI. 2005. Bacterial mechanisms to overcome inhibitory effects of dietary tannins. Microbiology and Ecology 50, 197-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-004-0180-x

Waghorn G. 2008.Beneficial and detrimental effects of dietary condensed tannins for sustainable sheep and goat production-Progress and challenges. Animal Feed Science and Technology 147(1-3), 116139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.09.013

Wickens GE.  2012. Economic Botany:Principles and Practice. http://books.google.com.ph.isbn

Yousuf MB, Belewu MA, Daramola JO, Ogundun NI. 2007. Protein supplementary values of cassava, leucaena and gliricidia leaf meals in goats fed low quality Panicum maximum hay. Livestock Research for Rural Development 19, Article #23.  http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/2/yous19023.htmt