Yield and quality response of cotton to a consortium of PGPR at graded fertilizer levels

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/03/2017
Views (339) Download (14)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Yield and quality response of cotton to a consortium of PGPR at graded fertilizer levels

M. Amjad Qureshi, M. Asif Ali, F. Mujeeb, M. J. Ahmad, S. Rashid, Sana Ullah, M. A. Anjum
Int. J. Biosci.10( 3), 46-53, March 2017.
Certificate: IJB 2017 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Biofertilizers are formulations of rhizobacteria are eco-friendly, cost effective and have potential to sustain the yields in the intensive cropping system. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) have proved their worth for promoting the yield and quality traits of various crops by producing phytohormones, siderophores, antibiotics, mobilizing nutrients and inducing systemic resistance. In a series of experiment, the consortium of PGPR of Azotobacter and Azospirillum sp were tested on the yield parameters of cotton with graded levels of nitrogen (N) at Cotton Research Station, Sahiwal. Three levels of N i.e. 60, 90 and 120 kg ha-1 were applied while P was applied at 60 kg ha-1 to all the treatments. Results revealed that the bacterial consortium affected the cotton growth and yield at all N levels as compared to un-inoculated control. The maximum seed cotton yield i.e. 2478 was observed at 120 kg Nha-1 as compared to its respective control i.e. 2238 kg ha-1. The highest number of bolls plant-1 (25), boll weight (3.34 g) and plant height (126.9) were also observed at the same treatment. Results also showed that consortium of PGPR had reduced cotton leaf curl virus (CLCV) incidence up to 36.0% as compared to 41.0% without inoculation. The highest ginning out turn (GOT) and staple length was observed with PGPR consortium inoculation i.e. 38.6% and 27.8 mm as compared to un-inoculated control i.e. 37.9 % and 27.5 mm, respectively at 120 kg N ha-1. Present study clearly demonstrated that consortium of PGPR had more assenting effect on the yield components of cotton. More combination of PGPR should be used in different ecologies to validate this approach and to compensate the mineral fertilizer for sustainable agriculture.

VIEWS 16

Ahmad F, Ahmad I, Khan MS. 2006. Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiological Research 36, 1-9.

Ahmad M, Zahir ZA, Asghar HN, Asghar M. 2011. Inducing salt tolerance in mung bean through co-inoculation with rhizobia and plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate-deaminase. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 57, 578-589.

Akhtar N, Iqbal A, Qureshi MA, KhanKH. 2010. Effect of phosphate solubilizing bacteria on the Phosphorus availability and yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Journal of Scientific Research. 40, 15-24.

Anjum MA, Sajjad MR, Qureshi MA, Hussain SI, Rashid S, Jami AR. 2005. Response of cotton to diazotrophic bacterial inoculation under different nitrogen levels. Journal Agricultural Research 43, 39-52.

Anjum MA, Sajjad MR, Akhtar N, Qureshi MA, Iqbal A, Jami AR, Mahmud-ul-Hasan. 2007. Response of cotton to plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculation under different levels of nitrogen. Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 135-143.

Bharathi R, Vivekananthan R, Harish S, Ramanathan A, Samiyappan R. 2004. Rhizobacteria-based bio-formulations for the management of fruit rot infection in chillies. Crop Protection. 23, 835–843.

Cook RJ. 2002. Advances in plant health management in the twentieth century. Annual Review in Phytopathology 38, 95-116.

Dobereiner J, Pedrosa FO. 1987. Nitrogen fixing bacteria in non-leguminous crop plants. Science Tech. Madison, 155 P.

Duncan DB. 1955. Multiple Range and Multiple F-Test. Biometrics 11, 1-42.

Egamberdiyeva D. 2007. The effect of plant growth promoting bacteria on growth and nutrient uptake of maize in two different soils. Applied Soil Ecology 36, 184-189.

Egamberdiyeva D,  Juraeva D, Poberejskaya S, Myachina O, Teryuhova Seydalieva L, Aliev A. 2004. Improvement of wheat and cotton growth and nutrient uptake by phosphate solubilizing bacteria. p. 58-66. In: D. Jordan and D. Caldwell (eds.) 26th Southern Conservation Tillage Conference for Sustainable Agriculture, June 8-9, 2004. Raleigh, North Carolina. North Carolina Agricultural Research Service.

El-Komy HMA. 2005. Coimmobilization of Azospirillum lipoferum and Bacillus megaterium for Successful Phosphorus and Nitrogen Nutrition of Wheat Plants. Food Technology and Biotechnology 43, 19–27.

Farooq A, Farooq J, Mahmood A, Shakeel A, Rehman A, Batool A, Riaz M, Shahid MTH, Mehboob S. 2011. An overview of cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD) a serious threat to cotton productivity. Australian journal of Crop Science 5, 1823-1831.

Gholami A, Shahsavani S, Nezarat S. 2009. The effect of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) on germination, seedling growth and yield of maize. International Journal of Biology and Life Sciences 1, 35-40.

Jensen HL. 1953. Azotobacter as a crop inoculant. 245-251 P. In: Proceeding 5th  International Congress of Microbiology, Rome, Italy. 8-13 August.

Jeun YC, Park KS, Kim CH, Fowler WD, Kloepper JW. 2004. Cytological observations of cucumber plants during induced resistance elicited by rhizobacteria. Biological Control 29, 34–42.

Joseph B, Patra RR, Lawrence R. 2007. Characterization of plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria associated with chickpea (Cicer arietinum L). International Journal of Plant Production 2, 141-152.

Kennedy AC. 2005. Rhizosphere, In: Principles and Applications of Soil Microbiology, D.M., Sylvia, J.J., Fuhrmann, P.G., Hartel, and D.A., Zuberer, eds., 2nd Ed. Pearson, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 242-262 P.

Kennedy IR, Islam N. 2001. The current and potential contribution of asymbiotic nitrogen fixation to nitrogen requirements on farms: a review. Australian Journal of Expermental Agriculture 41, 447–457.

Khalid A, Arshad M, Zahir ZA. 2006. Phytohormones: microbial production and applications. p. 207-220. In: Biological Approaches to Sustainable Soil Systems. N. Uphoff , A.S. Ball, E. Fernandes, H. Herren, O. Husson, M. Laing, C. Palm, J. Pretty, P. Sanchez, N. Sanginga and J. Thies (Eds.), Taylor & Francis/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida.

Khan I, Masood A, Ahmad A. 2010. Effect of nitrogen fixing bacteria on plant growth and yield of Brassica juncea. Journal of Phytology 2, 25-27.

Krieg NR, Holt JG. 1984. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Vol. 1, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, USA. 694.

Kuiper I, Lagendijk EL, Bloemberg GV, Lugtenberg BJJ. 2004. Rhizoremediation: A Beneficial Plant-Microbe Interaction. Molecular Plant-microbe Interaction 17, 6–15.

Lugtenberg BJJ, Dekkers L, Bloemberg GV. 2001. Molecular determinants of rhizosphere colonization by Pseudomonas. Annual Review in Phytopathology 38, 461-490.

Mahale BB, Nevase VB, Thorate ST, Bhekale JS. 2003. Effect on non-symbiotic nitrogen fixers on the forage yield of oat (Avena sativa L.). Annuals of Agricultural Research New Series 24, 21-23.

Martins A, Kimura O, Goi SR, Baldani JI. 2004. Effect of co-inoculation of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and rhizobia on development of common bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, L.). Floresta e Ambiente 11, 33-39.

Mrkovacki N, Milic V. 2001. Use of Azotobacter chroococcum as potentially useful in agricultural application. Annals of Microbiology 51, 145–158.

Murphy JF, Zehnder GW, Schuster DJ, Sikora EJ, Polston JE, Kloepper JW. 2000. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial mediated protection in tomato against Tomato mottle virus. Plant Disease 84, 779-784.

Nadeem SM, Zahir ZA, Naveed M, Arshad M.2009. Rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminase confer salt tolerance in maize grown on salt affected soils. Canadian Journal Microbiology55, 1302-1309.

Paul S, Rathi MS, Tyagi SP. 2011. Interactive effect with AM fungi and Azotobacter inoculated seed on germination, plant growth and yield in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81, 1041–5.

Persello-Cartieaux F, Nussaume L, Robaglia C. 2003. Tales from the underground: Molecular plant-rhizobacteria interactions. Plant Cell Environment 26, 189-199.

Ramamoorthy V, Viswanathan R, Raguchander T, Prakasam V, Samiyappan R. 2001. Induction of systemic resistance by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in crop plants against pests and diseases. Crop Protection 2, 1–11.

Saharan BS, Nehra V. 2011. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria: A Critical Review. Life Sciences and Medicine Research, LSMR-21, 1-30.

Salantur A, Ozturk A, Akten S. 2006. Growth and yield response of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to inoculation with rhizobacteria. Plant Soil Environment 52,111–118.

Sarwar M, Arshad DA, Martens JR, Frankenberger Jr WT. 1992. Tryptophan dependent biosynthesis of auxins in soil. Plant and Soil 147, 207-215.

Sridevi S, Ramakrishnan K. 2010. The effect of NPK fertilizer and AM fungi on the growth and yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) var. LRA 5166. Recent Research in Science and Technology 2, 39–41.

Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dicky DA. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics- A Biometrical Approach. 3rd Edition, Mc Graw-Hill Book International Co., Singapore. 204­­-227 P.

Steenhoudt O, Vanderleyden J. 2000. Azospirillum, a free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterium closely associated with grasses: genetic, biochemical and ecological aspects. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 24, 487–506.

Vessey JK. 2003. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers, Plant Soil 255, 571-586.

Wu SC, Cao ZH, Li ZG, Cheung KC, Wong MH. 2005.  Effects of biofertilizer containing N-fixer, P and K solubilizers and AM fungi on maize growth: a greenhouse trial. Geoderma 125, 155-166.

Zahran HH. 2001. Rhizobia from wild legumes: diversity, taxonomy, ecology, nitrogen fixation and biotechnology. J. Biotech. 91, 143-153.

Zehnder GW, Yao C, Murphy JF, Sikora EJ,Kloepper JW. 2000. Induction of resistance in tomato against cucumber mosaic cucumovirus by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Biocontrol 45, 127–137.

Zhang S, Reddy MS,Kloepper JW. 2002. Development of assays for assessing induced systemic resistance by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria against blue mold of tobacco. Biological Control 23, 79-86.