Seed priming affected physiology and grain yield of chickpea under salt stress

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2014
Views (821)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Seed priming affected physiology and grain yield of chickpea under salt stress

Milad Abdolahpour, Ramin Lotfi
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 5(1), 442-446, July 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

In order to study the effect of priming and salinity on seed germination, physiological characteristics and grain yield of chickpea, an experiment was carried out under hydroponic condition. Results showed that germination percentage and rate significantly reduced under salt stress. KNO3 was proper trait than that of hydro-priming to improving germination rate. Leaf area index (LAI) and membrane stability index (MSI) reduced under salt stress specially sever salt level (S3). Seed priming had no effect on LAI and MSI. In contract, primed plants significantly increased leaf water content (LWC). KNO3 under sever salinity condition improved LWC of chickpea. Loss of grain yield under sever salt stress in comparison to control was 76%. Priming seed by water and KNO3 enhanced grain yield approximately 13% and 27%, respectively in comparison to control. As a result of this research chickpea was sensitive plant to salinity and priming especially by KNO3 can be improved physiological characteristic and grain yield of this plant.

Abbasdokht H. 2011. The effect of hydropriming and halopriming on germination and early growth stage of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Desert, 16, 61-68.

Abbo S, Berger J, Turner NC. 2003. Evolution of cultivated chickpea: four bottlenecks limit diversity and constrain adaptation. Funct. Plant Biol. 30, 1081–1087.

Ajouri A, Haben A, Becker M. 2004. Seed priming enhances germination and seedling growth of barley under conditions of P and Zn deficiency. J. Plant Nut. Soil Sci. 2004. 167, 630-636.

Basra SMA, Farooq M, Afzal I, Hussain M. 2006. Influence of osmopriming on the germination and early seedling growth of coarse and fine rice. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 8, 19-22.

Ellis RH, Roberts EH. 1980. Towards a rational basis for testing seed quality, In: Seed production, Butterworths, London (Ed. Hebblethwaite PD), 605-635.

Ghassemi-Golezani K, Taifeh-Noori M, Oustan S H, Moghaddam M. 2009. Response of soybean cultivars to salinity stress. J. Food, Agri. Environ. 7, 401-404.

Gossett DR, Lucas MC. 1994. Antioxidant response to NaCl stress in salt tolerant and salt sensitive cultivars of cotton. Crop Sci. 34, 706-714.

Halmer P. 2004. Methods to improve seed performance in the field, In: Benech-Arnold R L, Sanchez R (eds) Handbook of Seed Physiology. Food Product Press, New York. 125-156.

Jones MMN, Turner C. 1978. Osmotic adjustment in leaves of Sorghum in response to water deficits. Plant Physiol., 61, 122–126.

Kaur S, Gupta AK, Kaur, N. 2002. Effect of osmo-and hydropriming of chickpea seeds on seedling growth and carbohydrate metabolism under water deficit stress. Plant Growth Regul. 37, 17-22.

McDonald MB. 2000. Seed priming. In: Black M, Bewley JD (eds) Seed Technology and Biological Basis. Sheffield Academic Press. England. Chapter 9, pp. 287-325.

Premchandra GS, Saneoka H, Ogata S. 1990. Cell membrane stability, an indicator of drought tolerance as affected by applied nitrogen in soybean. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 115, 63-66.

Sadeghipour O. 2008. Effect of withholding irrigation at different growth stages on yield and yield components of mung bean (viciaradiata L. Wilezek) varieties. American Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 4, 590-594.

Sairam RK. 1994. Effect of moisture stress on physiological activities of two contrasting wheat genotypes. Ind. J. Exp. Biol. 32, 594-597.

Sarmadi R, Eradatmand-Asil D, Eghdami A. 2014. Effect of seed priming by potassium nitrate on nodulation of common bean. Int. J. Farming and Allied Sci. 3, 312-316.

Shahid MA, Balal RM, Pervez MA, Abbas T, Ashfaq M, Ghazanfar U, Afzal M, Rashid A, Garcia-Sanchez and F, Mattson NS. 2012. Differential response of pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes to salt stress in relation to the growth, physiological attributes antioxidant activity and organic solutes. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 6, 828-838.

Subedi KD, Ma BL. 2005. Seed priming does not improve corn yield in a humid temperate environment. Agron. J. 97, 211-218.

Teimouri A, Jafari M, Azarnivand H. 2009. Effect of proline, soluble carbohydrates and water potential on resistance to salinity of three Salsola species. Desert. 14, 15-20.

Related Articles

Value chain analysis and business model development of the Rizal mango growers agriculture cooperative

Macluven T. Gonzales, Diana O. Lim*, Karen Joy A. Abalos, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 186-198, July 2026.

Susceptibility of Culex quinquefasciatus to insecticides in the industrial areas of Koumassi, Vridi, and Yopougon in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, during the rainy season

Gahapie Urbain Silue*, Koffi Ladji Yao, N’tamon Romeo N’tamon, Edmond Charles Basseli, Genevieve Lydie Acapovi-Yao, Yao Lucien Konan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 175-185, July 2026.

Optimization of maltodextrin as a bulking agent in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit bar: Physical, sensory, and nutritional evaluation

Macluven T. Gonzales*, Diana O. Lim, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 150-163, July 2026.

An assessment of the effect of wind flow on the indoor thermal condition of some buildings in Benin City, Nigeria

Tashok, Yusuf Haruna*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 136-149, July 2026.

Analyzing roadside tree diversity reveals dominance, shadow diversity, and management archetypes: The case of Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines

Johnuel Tac-on, Jesie Diola, Noel T. Lomosbog, Jairyl B. Oclarit, MA. Aneli A. Lanzaderas*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 122-135, July 2026.

Floristic diversity of major river systems in Zamboanga del Norte

Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, Maria Rio A. Naguit, Ethel T. Cata-al, Tessie G. Pulido, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 101-111, July 2026.