Water table fluctuation and carbon dioxide emission from a tropical peat soil cultivated with pineapples (Ananas comosus L. Merr.)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/01/2017
Views (335) Download (8)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Water table fluctuation and carbon dioxide emission from a tropical peat soil cultivated with pineapples (Ananas comosus L. Merr.)

W. Luta, O. H. Ahmed, R. K. J. Heng, L. K. N. Choo
Int. J. Biosci.10( 1), 172-178, January 2017.
Certificate: IJB 2017 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Tropical peat land is an important buffer for climate change as it absorbs atmospheric carbon and stores large carbon reserve. Inappropriate drainage and agricultural development on peat land results in GHG emissions such as CO2 and CH4which could shift the peat land ecosystem from carbon sink to carbon source. The objectives of this study were to: (i) quantify CO2 loss in a tropical soil under simulated water table fluctuation and (ii) determine the relationship between depth of water table and CO2 loss of a tropical soil cultivated with pineapples. Soil CO2 emission was captured using closed chamber method in field lysimeter and quantified using gas chromatography. It was carried out in July (dry month) and December 2015 (wet month). The peat soil water table fluctuation did not significantly affect emission of CO2 in pineapple cultivation. For lower water table, 147.5 t CO2 ha-1 yr-1 was emitted in the dry month whereas for higher water table, 19.6 t CO2 ha-1 yr-1. In the wet month, CO2emission of the lower water table was 23.7 t CO2 ha-1 yr-1whereasfor high water tables the emission was 25.6 t CO2 ha-1 yr-1. Soil CO2 emission for the lower water table was higher than that of the high water table whereas the opposite was true for the higher water table because of increase in soil temperature in the dry month. Regardless of season and depth of peat soil water table, this study will provide significant understanding of the effect of water table management on carbon loss in peat soils under pineapple cultivation.

VIEWS 13

Abdul H, Kazuyuki I, Yuichiro F, Erry P, Muhammad R, Haruo T. 2005. Greenhouse gas emissions from tropical peat lands of Kalimantan, Indonesia. Nutrient Cycling in Agrosystems 71, 73 – 80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10705-004-0380-2

Ahmed OH, Liza Nuriati LKC. 2015.Greenhouse Gas Emission and Carbon Leaching in Pineapple Cultivation on Tropical Peat Soil. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/906021

Berglund Ö, Berglund K, Klemedtsson L. 2010. A lysimeter study on the effect of temperature on CO2 emission from cultivated peat soils. Geoderma 154 (3-4), 211-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.09.007

Berglund Ö, Berglund K. 2011. Influence of water table level and soil properties on emissions of greenhouse gases from cultivated peat soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 43, 923-931. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.01.002

Burrows HE, Bubier LJ, Mosedale A, Cobb WG, Crill MP. 2005. Net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide in a temperate poor fen: a comparison of automated and manual chamber techniques. Biogeochemistry 76, 21-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1799-2015

Chimner AR, Cooper JD. 2003. Influence of water table levels on CO2emissions in a Colorado subalpine fen: an in situ microcosm study. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 35, 345 – 351.

Chen H, Mothapo NV, Shi W. 2014. The significant contribution of fungi to soil N2O production across diverse ecosystems. Applied Soil Ecology 73, 70-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0488-0

Couwenberg J. 2011. Greenhouse gas emissions from managed peat soils: is the IPCC reporting guidance realistic? Mires and Peat 8(2), 1-10.

Fenner N, Ostle JN, McNamara N, Sparks T, Harmens H, Reynolds B, Freeman C. 2007. Elevated CO2 effects on peat land plant community carbon dynamics and DOC production. Ecosystems 10, 635 – 647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10021-007-9051-x

IAEA. 1992. Manual on measurement of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from agriculture. In Sampling techniques and sample handling, pp. 45-67.IAEATECDOC-674. Vienna, Austria: IAEA.

Jauhiainen J, Hoojier A, Page SE. 2012. Carbon dioxide emissions from an Acacia plantation on peat land in Sumatra, Indonesia. Biogeoscience 9, 617-630. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-617-2012

Kasimir-Klemedtsson A, Klemedtsson L, Berglund K, Martikainen P, Silvola J, Oenema O. 1997. Greenhouse gas emissions from farmed organic soils: a review. Soil Use and Management 13, 245-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010372914805

Kechavarzi C, Dawson Q, Bartlett M, Leeds-Harrison BP. 2010. The role of soil moisture, temperature and nutrient amendment on CO2 efflux from agricultural peat soil microcosms. Geoderma 154, 203 – 210.

Kuzyakov Y. 2006. Sources of CO2 efflux from soil and review of partitioning methods. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 38, 425-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.020

Mäkiranta P, Minkkinen K, Hytönen J, Laine J. 2008. Factors causing temporal and spatial variation in heterotrophic and rhizospheric components of soil respiration in afforested organic soil croplands in Finland. Soil Biology& Biochemistry 40, 1592-1600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.01.009

Melling L, Hatano R, Goh KJ. 2005. Methane fluxes from three ecosystems in tropical peat land of Sarawak, Malaysia. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37, 1445-1453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.01.001

Mohammed Selamat M. 1996. Biologitanam and ankeperluanpersekitaran. In Penanaman Nanas – Nanas makansegardan nanas kaleng, ed. M. Mohammed Selamat, p. 7-16 P. Malaysia: MARDI.

Petterson M. 2004. Factors Affecting Rates of Change in Soil Bacterial Communities. (Doctoral thesis). Lund University, Sweden. http://www.lub.lu.se/luft/diss/sci_649/sci_649.pdf

Raziah ML, Alam AR. 2010. Status and impact of pineapple technology on mineral soil. Economic and Technology Management Review 5, 11-19.

Samuel AFB, Nick O, Chris F. 2006. Seasonal variation in decomposition processes in a valley-bottom riparian peat land. Science of the Total Environment 370, 561–573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.08.032

Van Huissteden J, Petrescu AMR, Hendriks DMD, Rebel KT. 2006. Modelling the effect of water-table management on CO2 and CH4 fluxes from peat soils, Netherland. Journal of Geosciences 85, 3-18.

Zulkefli M, Liza Nuriati LKC, Ismail AB. 2010.Soil CO2 flux from tropical peatland under different land clearing techniques. Journal of Tropical Agriculture and Food Science 38(1), 131-137.