Response of rice cultivars and insecticides against Rice stem borer (Scirpophaga incertulus) in Pakistan (Swat)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/08/2019
Views (899)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Response of rice cultivars and insecticides against Rice stem borer (Scirpophaga incertulus) in Pakistan (Swat)

Anwar Hussain, Afzaal Muhammad, Umer Hayat, Bashir Ahmad, Murtaza Ali, Kholod Khalid Mohammed Boathor, Saif Ullah
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 15(2), 88-94, August 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Rice is amongst the most vital food crops that provide an essential food for approximately half of the world’s population. Rice crops are disposed to both biotic and abiotic stresses. Biotic stresses contain insect pests, fungus and herbicide toxicity. This study was conducted at Agricultural Research Institute (North) Mingora Swat, Khyber Pakhtun Khwa (Pakistan) in 2014 to determine the toxicity of Karate (Lambda Cyhlothrin 2.5g/l), Lorsban (Chlorpyrifos 500g/l), Talstar (Bifentnthrin 100g/l), Lannate (Methomyl 225g/l). Curacron (Profenofos 500g/l) were applied to rice varieties (Oryza sativa), Basmati-385, JP-5, Fakhr-e-Malakand, Swat-1 and Dilrosh against rice stem borer, (Scirpophaga incertulas) and their effect on yield per hectare. In this study, the most resistant rice cultivar and effective insecticide against rice stem borer were investigated. Talstar Super resulted in to highest ranked in their efficacy against rice stem borer; as (3.7%) dead hearts while (7.5%) white hearts was recorded, which is significantly (P < 0.05) lower than control. Talstar with (52.71%) infestation was the most effective insecticide against rice stem borer followed by karate with (44.04%), Lorsbon (42.24%) and Lannate (41.70%). The lowest biological efficacy was recorded for Curacon (10.17%) significantly lower (P < 0.05) than the other tested varieties. The result also displayed the resistance of Swat-1, Basmiti-385 and Dilrosh to rice stem borer. This study made clear the Basmati-385 was the most susceptible variety against rice stem borer with lowest yield, JP-5 with (1688.3kg/ha) ranked first.

Ahmad N, Khan M, TofiquE M. 2011. Insect pests management of BT cotton through the manipulation of different eco-friendly techniques. Nucleus (Islamabad) 48, 249-254.

Bashir K, Husnain T, Fatima T, Latif Z, Mehdi SA, Riazuddin S. 2004. Field evaluation and risk assessment of transgenic indica basmati rice. Molecular Breeding 13, 301-312.

Bux M, Khan M, Ahmad N, Tofique M, Ismail M. 2013. Field comparison of different rice (Oryza sativa L) genotypes for their resistance against rice stem borers (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera). Pak. J. Agri 29, 137-145.

Inayatullah C, Rehman A, Ashraf M. 1986. Management of insect pests of paddy in Pakistan. Progressive Farming (Pakistan) 6, 54-62.

Iram S, Ahmad I, Ashraf M. 2003. A study on fungi and soil born diseases associated with rice-wheat cropping system of Punjab province of Pakistan. Pak J. Biol. Sci 6, 1-6.

Jahn GC, Almazan LP, Pacia JB. 2005. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the intrinsic rate of increase of Hysteroneura setariae (Thomas) (Homoptera: Aphididae) on rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environmental Entomology 34, 938-943.

Jahn GC, Litsinger JA, Chen Y, Barrion AT. 2006. 15 Integrated Pest Management of Rice: Ecological Concepts.

Jiang Y, Duan H, LI J, Yuan L, Wang Z, Gong C, Pei Q. 2005. Current situation and control countermeasures of eventful rice diseases and pests in Shanghai suburbs. Shanghai Nongye Xuebao 21, 78-81.

Khan L, Khaliq A. 1989. Field evaluation of some granular insecticides for the control of rice stem borers [Scirpophaga incertulas, S. innotata, Chilo polychrysa and Sesamia inferens]. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research (Pakistan).

Khan RA, Khan JA, Jamil F, Hamed M. 2005. Resistance of different basmati rice varieties to stem borers under different control tactics of IPM and evaluation of yield. Pakistan Journal of Botany 37, 319.

Related Articles

Optimization of maltodextrin as a bulking agent in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit bar: Physical, sensory, and nutritional evaluation

Macluven T. Gonzales*, Diana O. Lim, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 150-163, July 2026.

An assessment of the effect of wind flow on the indoor thermal condition of some buildings in Benin City, Nigeria

Tashok, Yusuf Haruna*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 136-149, July 2026.

Analyzing roadside tree diversity reveals dominance, shadow diversity, and management archetypes: The case of Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines

Johnuel Tac-on, Jesie Diola, Noel T. Lomosbog, Jairyl B. Oclarit, MA. Aneli A. Lanzaderas*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 122-135, July 2026.

Floristic diversity of major river systems in Zamboanga del Norte

Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, Maria Rio A. Naguit, Ethel T. Cata-al, Tessie G. Pulido, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 101-111, July 2026.

Consumer acceptability and market potential of a value-added mango fruit bar

Macluven T. Gonzales, Diana O. Lim*, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 86-91, July 2026.

Influence of wildlife hunting, human encroachment and wildlife disease spread on public health among rural foresters in Imo State, Nigeria

C. O. Osuagwu, M. N. Adendem, A. N. Ogbonna, N. O. Azubuike, A. N. Okeke, I. K. Osuagwu, O. D. Chukwuemeka, N. O. Ochor, J. U. Chikaire*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 76-85, July 2026.