Comparative study between two beehives in artificial swarming in beekeeping

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2018
Views (918)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Comparative study between two beehives in artificial swarming in beekeeping

Benamara Nasria, Belkhodja Hamza, Benbarek Hama
Int. J. Biosci. 12(2), 162-167, February 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The majority of beekeepers do not have much knowledge about the importance of raising queens. Which led us to focus on the interest and the advantage of this breeding, which is mainly the gain of the time and the productivity of the colony. To list its advantages, a comparative study was carried out from June 3rd, 2013 to September 3rd, 2013 between two colonies; one introduced a queen ready and the other that she should raise her queen. After three months of weekly interventions, a difference was evoked between the two colonies in the production of honey and in the provisions of the pollen and in the number of bees in the colony. This difference was noticed during the three months of experimentation that was triggered by a month of delay of the bee package slope. Therefore, the introduction of a queen already high in artificial swarming is very necessary to properly manage the bee population and well-controlled time.

Adjlane N, Doumandji S. 2011. Varroasis: biology, diagnosis and treatment, current situation of varroasis in Algeria, veterinary practice 9, 8-11.

Burgett M, Randal R, Walter T. 2009.Honeybee Colony Mortality in the Pacific Northwest (USA), American Bee Journal 149, 573-575.

Daniel P. 2002. Principles and methods of breeding bee queens, CFA and CFPPA, France.

Gilles R. 2001. Apiculture in the countries of North Africa, apiservice.

Gilles R. 2007. Health of the Bee, FNOSAD, apiservice.

Guerriat H. 1996. Chronicle of the Black Bee: Some Reflections on Species and Breeds. Beekeeping Belgium, 60(4), 112-113.

Guerriat H. 2003. Twenty years of bee genetics (second part). Bees & Co. No. 96, 14-17.

Jacobs F. 2004. Impact of pollen feeding on the longevity of the bee. Report of the first beekeeping technical conference, October 12, 2004, Roissy. BASF Agro Editions, Ecully, France, 57-67.

Maurice M. 1951. Life and Mores of Bees; Editions Payot, Paris, 224 p.

Sabot Y. 1980.Modern and simplified beekeeping treaty for beginners and amateurs, Bordessoules, 208 p. ISBN 2-903498-01-6.

Sefaoui T. 2004.Influence of artificial swarming on bee production, engineering memory, University of Mascara.

Tremblay H. 2008.Optimal management of the apiary. Quebec, Publications of the Center de reference in agriculture and food in Quebec, 75 p.

Related Articles

Dynamics of land use and land cover change in Puntland, Somalia: Drivers, trends, and implications for dryland ecosystem sustainability

Louis Njie Ndumbe*, Verina Ingram, Ettagbor Hans Enukwa, Fonwi Blanche-Kelly, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 285-295, June 2026.

Health risks linked to the contamination of fried fish sold on the streets of Abidjan (Côte d’Ivoire) by Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Bacillus cereus

Kouame N´Zebo Desire*, Krabi Ekoua Regina, Traore Moumouny, Dadie Adjehi, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 273-284, June 2026.

Nanotechnology-driven diagnostics and therapeutics in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Emerging technologies, clinical translation and future perspectives

Abhijeet Patnaik, S. Vidya, Sathyakumar Mayilvakanam*, Magesh Karuppur Thiagarajan, Aravindhan Ravi, Sivachandran Annamalai, Mitthra Suresh, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 216-272, June 2026.

Influence of lactation stage and fermentation environment on Kefir yield from cow’s milk

Imelda Hebron*, Jilrosh Eugenio, Rosalina Sagocsoc, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 200-207, June 2026.