Effect of indigenous and artificial mulches on yield attributes and yield of white maize (Zea mays L.)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2018
Views (547)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effect of indigenous and artificial mulches on yield attributes and yield of white maize (Zea mays L.)

Sharmin Akter Ranu, Kamal Uddin Ahamed
Int. J. Biosci. 12(6), 281-291, June 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the most promising cereal grains in the world but yield of maize is significantly limited by availability of water in different seasons. Mulching is widely used to improve the maize yields. The present study was conducted to find out the effect of indigenous and artificial mulches on yield attributes and yield of white maize under Bangladesh conditions. This experiment was carried on plant materials for white maize varieties such as Shuvra and KS-510 (hybrid variety) and on mulch materials such as control (without mulch), water hyacinth, rice straw, black polythene, white polythene, transparent polythene etc. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. It was found that the grain yields for Shuvra and KS-510 white maize was obtained to be 21.4 t ha -1 and 19.7 t ha-1 with rice straw mulch. On the other hand, the grain yield for Shuvra and KS-510 white maize was estimated to be 6.02 t ha-1 and 6.707 t ha-1 with control treatment. The obtained results suggest that the rice straw mulch is useful to obtain the highest grain yield of white maize as compared to other mulches.

BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics).2016. Annual Agricultural Statistics 2009–10. Statistics and Informatics Division (SID), Ministry of Planning, Government people’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 37.

Bhardwaj SP, Sindwal NS.1998. Zero tillage and weed mulch for erosion control on sloping farmland in Doon valley. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation 26,81–85.

Bhatt R, Khera KL, Arora S.2004. Effect of tillage and mulching on yield of corn in the submontane ous rained region of Punjab, India. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 6(1), 26–28. http://www.fspublishers.org/published_papers/30216_..pdf

Candido N, Miccolis V. 2003. Greenhouse melon response to plastic mulch. Acta Horticulture Journal 458, 263–2673.

Chen X, Chen XJ.1996. The effects of polythene mulch on production of a maize hybrid. Jilin Agricultural University Journal 18(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.458.33

FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization). 2015. FAO Statistical Pocketbook 2015, World Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Published by FAO, Rome, Italy, 28. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4691e.pdf

Govaerts B, Sayre KD, Lichter K, Dendooven L, Deckers J.2007. Influence of permanent raised bed planting & residue management on physical and chemical soil quality in rain fed maize–wheat systems. Plant and Soil Journal 291, 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9172-6

Kalaghatagi SB, Kulkarni GN, Mutanal SM.1988. Effects of various mulches and scheduling of irrigation on growth and yield of summer maize. Maharastra Agricultural University Journal 13(2), 223–224.

Pramanik SC.1999.In situ conservation of residual soil moisture through tillage and mulch for maize (Zea mays L.) in tropical Bay islands. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 69(4), 254–257.

Satter M A, Hossain SA, Iqbal J, Quyyum DMA, Alam MS, Mustafi RA. 2002. Production and use of corn in Bangladesh, A periodicals published by BARI and integrated Maize Development project, DAE, Bangladesh.

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 1988. Land Resource Apprisal of Bangladesh for Agricultural Development Report 2: Agro-ecological Regions of Bangladesh, FAO, Rome, Italy, 577.

Wang XF, Xu FA, Shani U.1994. Corn growth as affected by plastic cover under drip irrigation condition in the desert. Pedosphere Journal 4(3), 243–249.

Ward JK, Tissue DT, Thomas RB, Strain BR.1999. Compara­tive responses of model C3 and C4 plants to drought in low and elevated CO2.Global Change Biology Journal 5,857–867.

Related Articles

Unravelling the complex interactions between microplastics and PPCPs: The environment and health implications

Roshy Ann Mathews, S. Rajakumar, N. Aishwarya, M. Prashanthi Devi, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 40-72, November 2025.

Nutraceutical value of Gigantochloa atter and Bambusa blumeana

Eddilyn B. Plaza, Gemma A. Gruyal, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 34-39, November 2025.

Absence of climatic factors influence on the prevalence of COVID-19 in Benin: A spatiotemporal analysis

Houndonougbo Antoine, Lagaki Koudousse, Dramane Gado, Chogolou Ruth, Sanoussi Falilath, Kissira Islamiath, Sohou Stephane, Oloukou Freedy, Senou Elie, Yadouleton Anges, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 16-23, November 2025.

Isopulegol mitigates high glucose-induced oxidative stress in HK-2 cells via activation of the Nrf2/ARE pathway

Mathew Maria Caroline Rebellow, Ravishankar Sarumathi, Chandrasekaran Sankaranarayanan, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 6-15, November 2025.

Exploring Ctenolepis garcinii as a natural anti-diabetic agent: A phytochemical, biochemical and molecular docking approach

A. M. Thafshila Aafrin, R. Anuradha, Int. J. Biosci. 27(4), 208-214, October 2025.

Assessment of the population dynamics of microorganisms in mountainous brown soils of Gobustan in relation to soil-climate conditions

Zohra N. Mammadzada, Basti N. Alyeva, Sevinch J. Garayeva, Nizami R. Namazov, Int. J. Biosci. 27(4), 203-207, October 2025.