Responses of fruit bats to physical factors of selected forest patches in Mt. Kitanglad Range, Bukidnon, Philippines
Paper Details
Responses of fruit bats to physical factors of selected forest patches in Mt. Kitanglad Range, Bukidnon, Philippines
Abstract
Fruit bat species playing a vital role in forest regeneration are affected by the physical factors in the remaining tropical forest patches influenced by the anthropogenic activities in Mt. Kitanglad Range. Fruit bats were surveyed in the selected forest patches along the increasing elevation characterized by varied temperature, humidity and rainfall. Mist-netting method was done to capture fruit bats for wet and dry seasons in a year in Mt. Kitanglad Range. A total of nine (9) species of fruit bats under Family Pteropodidae such as Ptenochirus jagori (Greater Musky Fruit Bat), Ptenochirus minor (Lesser Musky Fruit Bat), Alionycteris paucidentata (Mindanao Pygmy Fruit Bat), Haplonycteris fischeri (Philippine Pygmy Fruit Bat), Cynopterus brachyotis (Common Short-Nosed Fruit Bat), Rousettus amplexicaudatus (Geoffroy’s Rousette), Macroglossus minimus (Long-Tongue Nectar Bat), Harpyionycteris whiteheadi (Harpy Fruit Bat) and Megaerops wetmorei (White-Collared Fruit Bat) were recorded in all elevations in Mt. Kitanglad Range for both seasons. Based on the netting effort, fruit bats were not affected by seasonal variation in the selected forest patches at all elevations given the foraging, roosting and breeding sites. Fruit bats distribution showed positive correlation to temperature but negatively correlated to elevation, relative humidity and rainfall patterns in forest patches. Thus, forest patches provided habitat for fruit bats with favourable climatic conditions in different elevation. This study would recommend protection of forest patches in the higher elevation and reforestation of degraded areas in highly threatened lowland areas of Mt. Kitanglad Range.
Armsworth PR, Kendall BE, Davis FW. 2004. An introduction to biodiversity concepts for environmental economists. Resource and energy economics 26, 115-136.
Bagarinao RT. 2010. Forest fragmentation in Central Cebu and its potential causes: A landscape ecological approach. Journal of Environmental Science and Management 13(2), 66-73.
Bierregaard R, Gascon C, Lovejoy TE, Mesquita R. 2001. Lessons from Amazonia: The ecology and conservation of a fragmented forest.
Faria D, Pacencia MLB, Dixo M, Laps RR, Baumgarten J. 2007. Ferns, frogs, birds, bats in forest fragments and shade cacao plantations in two contrasting landscapes in the Atlantic forest, Brazil. Biodiversity Conservation 16, 2335-2357.
Gehlhausen SM, Schwartz MW, Augspurger CK. 2000. Vegetation and microclimatic edge effects in two mixed-mesophytic forest fragments. Plant Ecology 147, 21-35.
Harris LD. 1984. The fragmented forest: Island biogeography theory and the preservation of biotic diversity. The University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0226317633.
Heaney LR, Tabaranza BRJR, Rickart EA, Balete SD, Ingle NR. 2006. The mammals of Mt. Kitanglad Nature Park, Mindanao, Philippines. Fieldiana. Zoology 112, 1-63.
Heideman PD, Utzurrum RCB. 2003. Seasonality and synchrony of reproduction in three species of nectarivorous Philippines bats. BMC Ecology 3, 11.
Hill J, Smith J. 1984. Bats: A Natural History. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Kays J, Schultz VM, Townsend P. 1999. Forest landowners in a fragmented landscape. Branching out: Maryland’s forest stewardship educator 7(2), 1-3.
Laurance WF, Yensen E. 1991. Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats. Biological Conservation 55, 77-92.
Liu DS, Iverson LR, Brown S. 1993. Rates and patterns of deforestation in the Philippines: Application of geographic information system analysis. Forest Ecology and Management 57, 1-16.
Lopez RC, Mirasol FSJR, Golosino B, Lasco RD. 2014. Mount Kitanglad Range proposed forest carbon development. World Agroforestry Centre. Southeast Asia Regional Office.
Noss RF, Cooperrider AY. 1994. Saving nature’s legacy: Protecting and restoring biodiversity. Island Press, Washington D.C. and Covelo, CA.
Nowak R. 1991. Order Chiroptera. Walker’s Mammals of the World Vol. 1, 5th Edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 190-194.
Opiso EM, Quimpang VT, Leaño EP, Galan GL, Acma FM, Coritico FP, Labadan A, Forten RR, Coquilla KL, Bruno AG, Amoroso VB. 2014. Assessment of biodiversity and water quality in association with land use in the Alanib river, Mt. Kitanglad Range Park, Philippines. Asian Journal of Biodiversity 5(1).
Ratcliffe JM, Hofstede HM. 2005. Roosts as information centres: Social learning of food preferences in bats. Biol. Lett 1, 72-74.
Relox RE, Ates-Camino FB, Bastian STJR, Leańo EP. 2009. Elevational gradation of mammals in tropical forest of Mt. Hamiguitan Range, Davao Oriental. Journal of Nature Studies 8(1), 27-34.
Rickart EA, Heaney LR, Heideman PD, Utzurrum RCB. 1993. The distribution and ecology of mammals on Leyte, Biliran and Maripipi Islands, Philippines. New Series No. 72. Field Museum of Natural History. USA.
Rola AC, Sumbalan AT, Suminguit VJ. 2014. Realities of the watershed management approach: The Manupali watershed experience (Final Report). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. Discussion Paper Series no. 2004-23.
Wade T. 2003. Forest fragmentation: Differentiating between human and natural causes. Environmental Protection Agency and Forest Service Department of Agriculture.
Richel Relox, Leonardo Florece (2018), Responses of fruit bats to physical factors of selected forest patches in Mt. Kitanglad Range, Bukidnon, Philippines; JBES, V12, N3, March, P324-333
https://innspub.net/responses-of-fruit-bats-to-physical-factors-of-selected-forest-patches-in-mt-kitanglad-range-bukidnon-philippines/
Copyright © 2018
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0