Insilico identification and characterization of abiotic stress responsive genes in Cucumis melo L. using bioinformatics tools

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2021
Views (935)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Insilico identification and characterization of abiotic stress responsive genes in Cucumis melo L. using bioinformatics tools

Asyia, Bibi Sadia, Wajia Noor , Shazia Irfan, Yasmeen Rehmat
Int. J. Biosci. 19(6), 173-182, December 2021.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2021; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Plants are exposed to various abiotic stress responsive genes. The present study was designed to investigate cold, drought and salt stress responsive genes in Cucumis melo L. for regulation of gene expression as 101273 ESTs of Cucumis melo L. and 3702 ESTs of Arabidopsis thaliana were explored for insilico of twenty one abiotic stress responsive genes. RAB18 (96%), CSD1 (94%), HVA22A (86%) GSTF7 (73%), CDSP32 (65%), ATMRK1 (65%) MPK3 (63%), ELIP1 (59%), COR47 (56%), ERD14 (42%), DDF1 (42%) DI19 (41%), LOS4 (40%), ABCF3 (37%), P5CS1 (36%), CDPK1 (27%), DREB2A (23%), STZ (18%) and HOS10 (57%) gene was expressed in three stresses cold drought and salt. Bioinformatics tools NCBI, ORF, BLAST, CDD, and MUSCLE were used to find out homology, conserved domains then conserved analysis of nucleotides and phylogenetic analysis of Cucumis melo L. The current study revealed that similarly conserved domain families in Arabidopsis thaliana and Cucumis melo L. were Ras super-family (RAB18), Cu-Zn-superoxide-Disntase super-family (CSD1), TB2-DP1-HVA22 super-family (HVA22A), GST-N-Phi thioredoxin-like super family (GSTF7), TRX-COSP32 (CDSP32), PKc-like super-family (ATMRK1), (MPK3), ), Chloroa-b-bind super-family (ELIP1), Dehydrin super-family (COR47,(ERD14), AP2 super-family (DDF1), Zf-Di19 super family (DI19), DEXDc super-family (LOS4), SunT super-family (HOS10) and (ABCF3), PROB super-family (P5CS1)and Zf-C2H2-6 super-family (STZ). Phylogenetic results revealed interesting fact although genes DI19, DREB2A, CDPK1 were more closely related to in Arabidopsis thaliana and Cucumis mel L. beside this ATMRK1, ERD14, LOS4, MPK3,CDSP32, P5CS1 not showing close relations.

Adams CF, Richardson M. 1981. Nutritive value of foods. USDA Home and Garden.

Barozai MYK, Wahid AH. 2012. Insilico identification and characterization cumulative abiotic stress responding genes in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Pak. J. Bot 44, 57-69

Bohnert HJ, Nelson DE, Jensen RG. 1995. Adaptations to environmental stresses. The plant cell 7(7), 1099.

Bray EA. 1993. Molecular responses to water deficit. Plant physiology 103(4), 1035

Lester G. 1997. Melon (Cucumis melo L.) fruit nutritional quality and health functionality. Hort Technology 7(3), 222-227.

Lytton J. 2004. The cation/Ca2+ exchanger superfamily: phylogenetic analysis and structural implications. Molecular biology and evolution 21(9), 1692-170

Ma Y, Qin F, Tran LSP. 2012. Contribution of genomics to gene discovery in plant abiotic stress responses. Molecular plant 5(6), 1176-1178.

Mittler R. 2006. Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends in Plant Science 11(1), 15-19.

Munger HM, Robinson RW. 1991. Nomenclature of Cucumis melo Cucurbit Genet.

Prabha R, Ghosh I, Singh DP. 2011. Plant Stress Gene Database: A collection of plant genes responding to stress condition. ARPN J. Sci. Technol 1, 28-31.

Reymond P, Weber H, Damond M, Farmer EE. 2000. Differential gene expression in response to mechanical wounding and insect feeding in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 12(5), 707-719.

Rhee SY, Dickerson J, Xu D. 2006. Bioinformatics and its applications in plant biology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol 57, 335-360.

Rhee SY, Dickerson J, Xu D. 2006. Bioinformatics and its applications in plant biology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol 57, 335-360.

Rizhsky L, Liang H, Shuman J, Shulaev V, Davletova S, Mittler R. 2004. When defense pathways collide. The response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant Physiology 134(4), 1683-1696.

Stracke R, Werber M, Weisshaar B. 2001. The R2R3-MYB gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Current opinion in plant biology 4(5), 447-456.

Yamaguchi K, Shinozaki K. 2006. Transcriptional regulatory networks in cellular responses and tolerance to dehydration and cold stresses. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol 57, 781-803.

Related Articles

Comparative responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to iron toxicity, drought and salinity stress: Morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular regulation mechanisms

Yaya Touré*, Brahima André Soumahoro, Arthur Martin Affery, Tchoa Koné, Mongomaké Koné, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 37-50, June 2026.

Biocontrol potential of indigenous fungal antagonists from soils naturally suppressive to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4

Arnel V. Somolostro*, Carolina D. Amper, Mellprie B. Marin, Darwin M. Apistar, Myrna G. Ballentes, Ailyn Q. Daniel, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 27-36, June 2026.

Basal stem rot of oil palm in Africa: Emerging epidemiology, pathogen diversity and future management challenges

Emmanuel Fumbuka Mabula*, Agatha Aloyce, Alfonce Leonard, Pavithravani B. Venkataramana, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 13-26, June 2026.

The role of aberrant glycosylation in autoimmune disease development and progression

Md. Nafis Fuad Prottoy, Sayad Md. Didarul Alam*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 1-12, June 2026.

Solvents’ influence on polyphenolic compound extractions from Lippia multiflora leaves (Mold, 1949), and their antioxidant activity

Kelemin Awa Koné*, Tagouèlbè Tiho, Mariam Sanogo, Casimir Kekou, Kouassi Hervé Tani, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 109-116, May 2026.

Economics of selected cropping system practices in the province of La Union, Philippines

Jennifer A. Cabading, V. Sagun Analyn, Angelina T. Gonzales*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 97-108, May 2026.

The hidden burden: A review of toxicity from femoral orthopedic implants

Haroon Habib Beigh*, Nabeel Khan, Mirza Masroor Ali Beg, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 84-96, May 2026.