Rapid biodiversity assessment in the buffer zone of Bataan National Park, Luzon Island, Philippines

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/08/2018
Views (1415)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Rapid biodiversity assessment in the buffer zone of Bataan National Park, Luzon Island, Philippines

Delia S Llave, Romualdo B De Guzman Jr, Adrian C Perdio, Mark Nell C Corpuz
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 13(2), 336-345, August 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Rapid biodiversity assessment using communities of flora and fauna was conducted in the buffer zone areas of Bataan National Park. Seventeen stations were designated for the documentation of floral and faunal species. Samples were documented through sight viewing and based from interviews to local communities. Biodiversity indices were also estimated for the floral communities. The 8-month survey recorded 3,850 plant individuals, belonging to at least 118 species, five of which were classified as endemic. Nine angiosperms comprised the 50% of the total mean abundance, eight of which has agricultural significance. Banana (Musa x paradisiaca) and mango (Mangifera indica) were present in all sampling sites. The top five plant species with the highest Important Value Index were M. paradisiaca, M. indica, Cocos nucifer, Gliricidia sepium, and Anacardium occidentale. Shannon diversity indices and evenness values are high in all sampling stations with a mean of no less than 1.70, and 0.6, respectively. Recorded faunal species had a total of 34 species including eight mammals, six reptiles, and 20 birds. In this survey, seven avian species were classified as endemic, two in reptile, and one in mammal. This study also attempted to document various anthropogenic activities and land use pattern that can cause the biodiversity loss in the buffer areas.

Danielsen F, Balete DS, Poulsen MK, Enghoff M, Nozawa CM, Jensen AE. 2000. A simple system for monitoring biodiversity in protected areas of a developing country. Biodiversity & Conservation 9(12), 1671-1705.

Hayek LAC, Buzas MA. 2010. Surveying natural populations: quantitative tools for assessing biodiversity. Columbia University Press.

Kemp PF, Sherr BE, Cole JJ. 1993. Handbook of Methods in Aquatic Microbial Ecology. 1st ed. Lewis Publishers 777 p.

Lim TMS, Salzer W. 2011. An In-Depth Review of the NIPAS Law and Related Statutes on the Establishment and Management of Protected Areas in the Philippines.

Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF, Fischer J. 2006. General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation. Biological conservation 131(3), 433- 445.

Magurran AE. 2013. Measuring biological diversity. John Wiley & Sons.

Ramsundar H. 2004. The distribution and abundance of wetland ichthyofauna, and exploitation of the fisheries in the Godineau Swamp, Trinidad – Case Study. Int J Tropic Biol 53(1), 13- 23.

Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, University Illinois Press, 117 p.

Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163, 688.

Related Articles

Language and culture: Prerequisites for human capital development and enhanced household food security among vulnerable women farmers in Imo State, Nigeria

N. F. Nwulu, M. O. Igwenagu, G. U. Amadi, F. D. Anuonye, G. N. Ogbonna, C. F. Obumneke, S. U. Obasi, J. C. Onyeakazi, C. G. Iroagba, N. C. Anigbogu, K. U. Chukwu, C. G. Opara, E. N. Onuoha, N. U. Nzotta, C. R. Ayozie, B. N. Igbokwe, L. O. Duru, O. V. Obiagwu, C. I. Ahumaraeze, U. A. Agwuocha, J. U. Chikaire*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 1-16, June 2026.

Ziziphus spina-christi as a bioindicator of heavy metals (Cu, Cd) in Baghdad, Iraq

Israa Radhi Khudhair*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 45-49, May 2026.

Language choice for natural resource conservation and agricultural production information sharing and communication strategies for improved livelihoods among rural farmers in Southeast, Nigeria

N. F. Nwulu, C. F. Obumneke, S. U. Obasi, J. C. Onyeakazi, C. G. Iroagba, N. C. Anigbogu, K. U. Chukwu, C. G. Opara, E. N. Onuoha, C. R. Ayozie, B. N. Igbokwe, L. O. Duru, O. V. Obiagwu, M. O. Igwenagu, G. U. Amadi, F. D. Anuonye, G. N. Ogbonna, N. U. Nzotta, C. I. Ahumaraeze, U. A. Agwuocha, J. U. Chikaire*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 27-44, May 2026.

Correlates of students’ beliefs on environmental protection: Awareness, compliance, and sociodemographic influences

Anderson G. Gonzales*, Cyrus Kelly Macabangon, Dexter Dumayag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 18-26, May 2026.

Prevalence of phosphate solubilising bacteria in Muthupet Mangrove Reserve

S. Alice Keerthana, V. Shanmugaraju*, M. Poongothai, P. Arun, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 9-17, May 2026.

The bush mango value chain in South West Cameroon: Governance, sustainability and emerging opportunities

Louis Njie Ndumbe*, Agbor Mc Nasare, Baliki Winifred, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 1-8, May 2026.

General characteristics of the mycobiota of vegetable and melon plants cultivated in Azerbaijan

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva*, A. Kh. Rajabli, E. I. Allahverdiyev, A. G. Eyvazov, S. F. Azadaliyeva, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 139-145, April 2026.

Comparative assessment of plant biomass in the climatic zones of Burkina Faso

Alimata Zorom*, Yélézouomin Stéphane Corentin Somé, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 129-138, April 2026.