Coastal community perceptions and management strategies towards the coastal and marine resources of Ipil and Tungawan, Zamboanga Sibugay

Paper Details

Research Paper 15/05/2022
Views (1248)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Coastal community perceptions and management strategies towards the coastal and marine resources of Ipil and Tungawan, Zamboanga Sibugay

Jay Ann S. Tambac, Jaime Q. Guihawan, Hernando Bacosa, Lilybeth Olowa
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 20(5), 8-18, May 2022.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2022; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

This study was conducted to assess the perception and management strategies of coastal communities towards the coastal and marine resources of Ipil and Tungawan, Zamboanga Sibugay. With the use of survey questionnaire, a total of 45 respondents from the coastal community of Ipil and Tungawan participated in the study. Most of the respondents in the study practice fishing and most of them have relied 76-100% of their family income in in this activity. Based on the study conducted, all of the residents in the coastal community have participated in the management strategies which were implemented through law enforcement and community development activities. Ipil focuses on providing an incentive based approach among its residents while Tungawan focuses on strengthening its law enforcement while coordinating with other government agencies that requires the residents to join the community development activities. Respondents of the study described the condition of coastal and marine resources upon their arrival in the area, were in deteriorating state and has improved at present. With the current government efforts most of the respondents were hopeful and thus, perceived that the resources would improve in the coming 5, 10 to 15 years. Moreover, a study that focuses on the socioeconomic effect of this management strategies was therefore recommended for future researchers.

Arin T, Kramer RA. 2002. Divers’ willingness to pay to visit marine sanctuaries: an exploratory study. Ocean & Coastal Management 45(2-3), 171-183.

Bennett NJ, Dearden P. 2014. Why local people do not support conservation: Community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand. Marine policy 44, 107-116.

Bhandari P. 2020. Designing and analyzing Likert scales. Scribbr. url: https://www. scribbr. com/methodology/likert-scale (visited on 2020-10-07).

Boudouresque CF, Cadiou G, Le Diréac’h L. 2005. Marine protected areas: a tool for coastal areas management. In Strategic management of marine ecosystems. Springer, Dordrecht (pp. 29-52).

Cinner J. 2005. Socioeconomic factors influencing customary marine tenure in the Indo-Pacific. Ecology and society 10(1).

Ehler CN, Basta DJ. 1993. Integrated management of coastal areas and marine sanctuaries: a new paradigm. Oceanus 36(3), 6+.

Ferreira A, Seixas S, Marques JC. 2015. Bottom-up management approach to coastal marine protected areas in Portugal. Ocean & Coastal Management 118, 275-281.

Gabela-Flores MV, Diedrich A. 2021. Exploring leadership dynamics in community-based marine protected areas. Marine Policy 129, 104569.

Himes AH. 2007. Performance indicators in MPA management: using questionnaires to analyse stakeholder preferences. Ocean & Coastal Management 50(5-6), 329-351.

Holland DS. 2002. Integrating marine protected areas into models for fishery assessment and management. Natural Resource Modeling 15(3), 369-386.

Hyrenbach KD, Forney KA, Dayton PK. 2000. Marine protected areas and ocean basin management. Aquatic conservation: marine and freshwater ecosystems 10(6), 437-458.

Islam GMN, Tai SY, Kusairi MN, Ahmad S, Aswani FMN, Senan KAM, Ahmad A. 2017. Community perspectives of governance for effective management of marine protected areas in Malaysia. Ocean & Coastal Management 135, 34-42.

Kamil KA, Hailu A, Rogers A, Pandit R. 2017. An assessment of marine protected areas as a marine management strategy in Southeast Asia: A literature review. Ocean & Coastal Management 145, 72-81.

Kawamura G, Bagarinao TU. 1980. Fishing methods and gears in Panay Island, Philippines. Memoirs of Faculty of Fisheries Kagoshima University 29, 81-121.

Marine Protected Areas Support Network. 2020. 2009 Most Outstanding MPA Finalist. Bangaan Marine Sanctuary.

Marine Protected Areas Support Network. 2020. 2009 Most Outstanding MPA Finalist. Buluan Island Marine Sanctuary.

Oracion EG, Miller ML, Christie P. 2005. Marine protected areas for whom? Fisheries, tourism, and solidarity in a Philippine community. Ocean & coastal management 48(3-6), 393-410.

Pita C, Pierce GJ, Theodossiou I. 2010. Stakeholders’ participation in the fisheries management decision-making process: fishers’ perceptions of participation. Marine policy 34(5), 1093-1102.

White AT. Sustainable marine conservation, baselines, and systematic monitoring- a few lessons from coastal resource management.

Related Articles

Overemphasis on blue carbon leads to biodiversity loss: A case study on subsidence coastal wetlands in southwest Taiwan

Yih-Tsong Ueng, Feng-Jiau Lin, Ya-Wen Hsiao, Perng-Sheng Chen, Hsiao-Yun Chang, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 46-57, August 2025.

An assessment of the current scenario of biodiversity in Ghana in the context of climate change

Patrick Aaniamenga Bowan, Francis Tuuli Gamuo Junior, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 35-45, August 2025.

Entomofaunal diversity in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] cultivation systems within the cotton-growing zone of central Benin

Lionel Zadji, Roland Bocco, Mohamed Yaya, Abdou-Abou-Bakari Lassissi, Raphael Okounou Toko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 21-34, August 2025.

Biogenic fabrication of biochar-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles using Miscanthus sinensis for oxytetracycline removal and toxicological assessment

Meenakshi Sundaram Sharmila, Gurusamy, Annadurai, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 10-20, August 2025.

Bacteriological analysis of selected fishes sold in wet markets in Tuguegarao city, Cagayan, Philippines

Lara Melissa G. Luis, Jay Andrea Vea D. Israel, Dorina D. Sabatin, Gina M. Zamora, Julius T. Capili, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 1-9, August 2025.

Effect of different substrates on the domestication of Saba comorensis (Bojer) Pichon (Apocynaceae), a spontaneous plant used in agroforestry system

Claude Bernard Aké*1, Bi Irié Honoré Ta2, Adjo Annie Yvette Assalé1, Yao Sadaiou Sabas Barima1, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(1), 90-96, July 2025.

Determinants of tree resource consumption around Mont Sangbé national park in western Côte d’Ivoire

Kouamé Christophe Koffi, Serge Cherry Piba, Kouakou Hilaire Bohoussou, Naomie Ouffoue, Alex Beda, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(1), 71-81, July 2025.