A physico-social analysis of terrestrial invasive plants species in sub-tropical sub-humid tract of district Haripur

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/11/2017
Views (961)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

A physico-social analysis of terrestrial invasive plants species in sub-tropical sub-humid tract of district Haripur

Saima Saleem, Naureen Aurangzeb, Aliya Naz, Sobia Nisa, Muhammad Rizwan, Khanzadi Nazneen Manzoor, Assad Zaib, Farakh Javed
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 11(5), 46-50, November 2017.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2017; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Climate changes, landowner diversity, human socio-cultural, the biological and ecological characteristics of invasive plants and the nature of the communities they invade are the major drivers of plant invasion. This study aimed to investigate a physico social analysis of terrestrial invasive plants species in sub-tropical sub-humid tract of District Haripur and to identify and enlists non-native invasive plants in Haripur district. Study was carried out in district Haripur of KP Pakistan. First, abundance of occurrences of all major invasive plants was assessed to rank the top four invasive plants in the region. Secondly; collected data was statistically analyzed for top four invasive plants. Study revealed ranking and perceptions of these top four plant species across this area i.e. Parethenium hysterophorous, Broussonetia papyriera, Cannabis sativa, Eucalyptus camaldulensis. It has been concluded that pathways of plant invasion are versatile and current management efforts are not sufficient to limit this invasion coverage. Adoption of an integrated invasive management approach by combining all issues, specifically climate change, existing social and political issues related to land use and land ownership by amenity oriented lifestyles and introduction and expansion pathways of identified plant species is recommended.

Alderman DH. 2004. Channing Cope and Making of a Miracle Vine. The Geographical Review 94, 157-177.

Baker HG. 1965. Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds, In: The genetics of colonizing species (eds. H.G. Baker and G. L. Stebbins). Academic Press, New York, 147- 172.

Bazaz FA. 1986. Life history of colonizing plants: some demographic, genetic and physiological features, In: Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii (eds. H. A. Mooney and J. A. Drake) Springer-Verlag, New York, 96- 110.

Cook GD, Dias L. 2006. It was not accident: deliberate plant introductions by Australian government agencies during the 20th century. Turner review no. 12, Australian Journal of Botany 54, 601-625.

Coutts-Smith AJ, Downey PO.2006. The impacts of weeds on threatened biodiversity in New South Wales, Technical Series 11. CRC for Weed Management, Adelaide.

Davis M. 2011.Don‘t judge species on their origins. Nature, 474,9-15.

Elton CS. 1958. The ecology of invasions by animals and plant, University of Chicago press. USA.

Head L, Muir P. 2004. Nativeness, invasiveness and nation in Australian plants. The Geographical Review 94, 199-217.

Holm L.1978.Some characteristics of weed problems in two worlds. Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Science31, 3-12.

Jackson J. 2004. Impacts and management of Buffel grass (Cenchrus cillaris) as an invasive species in Northern Queensland, PhD thesis, School of Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Queensland.

Mack RN. 1996. Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. Biological Conservation 78, 107-121.

Mc Neeley JA.2011. Xenophobia or Conservation: Some Human Dimensions of Invasive Alien Species. In: Invasive and Introduced Plants and Animals: Human Perceptions.

Randall JM. 1997. Defining weeds of natural areas, In: Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions (Eds. J.O. Luken and J.W. Thieret) Springer-Verlag, New York, 18-25.

Robbins P. 2004. Comparing invasive networks: culture and political biographies of invasive species. The Geographical Review 94, 139-156.

Swarbrick JT, Skarratt DB. 1994. The Bush weed 2 Database of Environmental weeds in Australia, The University of Queensland Gotton College, Gotton, Queensland.

Related Articles

Value chain analysis and business model development of the Rizal mango growers agriculture cooperative

Macluven T. Gonzales, Diana O. Lim*, Karen Joy A. Abalos, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 186-198, July 2026.

Susceptibility of Culex quinquefasciatus to insecticides in the industrial areas of Koumassi, Vridi, and Yopougon in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, during the rainy season

Gahapie Urbain Silue*, Koffi Ladji Yao, N’tamon Romeo N’tamon, Edmond Charles Basseli, Genevieve Lydie Acapovi-Yao, Yao Lucien Konan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 175-185, July 2026.

Optimization of maltodextrin as a bulking agent in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit bar: Physical, sensory, and nutritional evaluation

Macluven T. Gonzales*, Diana O. Lim, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 150-163, July 2026.

An assessment of the effect of wind flow on the indoor thermal condition of some buildings in Benin City, Nigeria

Tashok, Yusuf Haruna*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 136-149, July 2026.

Analyzing roadside tree diversity reveals dominance, shadow diversity, and management archetypes: The case of Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines

Johnuel Tac-on, Jesie Diola, Noel T. Lomosbog, Jairyl B. Oclarit, MA. Aneli A. Lanzaderas*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 122-135, July 2026.

Floristic diversity of major river systems in Zamboanga del Norte

Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, Maria Rio A. Naguit, Ethel T. Cata-al, Tessie G. Pulido, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 101-111, July 2026.