Ground water aquifer properties of Sargodha City, Punjab, Pakistan

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/11/2017
Views (1200)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Ground water aquifer properties of Sargodha City, Punjab, Pakistan

Muhammad Mobeen, Amatul Moin, Mirza Naseer
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 11(5), 138-148, November 2017.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2017; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Groundwater is the major source for drinking and household use in the study area. Water quality deterioration has been reported as one of the most serious problem in Sargodha City, Punjab, Pakistan. The city is under severe water stress because of rapid decline in water quantity and quality. The present study examines the groundwater quality parameters of different aquifers categorized on the basis of their borehole depth. The aquifers mapping in the study area have not yet been made so for. The present study is a pioneer work of its kind as water quality of different aquifers from varied depth has been spatially analyzed. Random proportionate sampling was made for sample selection from one hundred different sites. The samples were analyzed by the authors in water quality testing lab. The site selection for sampling was based upon land-use classification of the study area. Seventeen parameters from each sample were calculated. The result of water samples was grouped according to the water table depth of each borehole. The four groups of aquifers showed a clear variation among different parameters i.e. Chloride, Sulfate, and TDS were found above the normal limit. The average electrical conductivity is 3625.4gm/l in group A is 335.28mg/l in B and 2868.636 in C. The average value of chloride in group A is 1368 mg/l while 1247.786 mg/l in group B and 1295.807 mg/l in C. The TDS values are 4270.04 mg/l in A and 2987.019 mg/l in B and 3409.091 in C.  The all parameters showed a clearly deteriorating trend in groundwater quality of the study area. The findings of the study are in line with the different researches conducted in the surrounding areas. The results of the study are a wakeup call for the residents and district administration. The results have highlighted the water quality issue and asked for serious attentions from the relevant authorities.

Aeen Rose Kujur, HasanAkhtar. 2004. “Application of Groundwater Modeling in Development of Sustainable Water Resource Framwork” international journal of Science and research publication 4.

Alan Strahler ‘Introducing Physical Geography, 4th. Dr. Muhammad Aslam Tahir 2008. Water quality status in Rural Areas of Pakistan’. Manual on Aquifer Mapping’  Government of India ministry of water resource central groundwater board.

Berardinucci J, Ronneseth K. 2002.Guide to using the BC Aquifers classification Maps for the project of water land air protectio’.

Jacob Toon, Milovan, Belin S, Randail Ross R. 1992. “Groundwater Issue” Fundamentals of Groundwater Modeling.

Malik MA, Saboor A. 2010. Water Quality Status of Upper KPK and Northern Areas of Pakistan. Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources, Water Resources Research Centre, Peshawar, Ministry of Science and Technology.

Mishra DD. 200. Fundamental Concepts in Environmental Studies. . S. Chand & Company Ltd.

Mishra DD. “Fundamental concept in environmental studies”. Genena.

Mishra SP. 2000. “Essectial Environmental Studies”.Norsalica Usali& Mohd HasmadiIsmail (3, September 2010) “Use of Remote Sensing and GIS in Monitoring water quality”.

Nadia Babiker Ibrahim Shakak. 2015 “Integration of Remote Sensing and GIS in Groundwater Quality”  Germany.

Qureshi AS, Shah T, Akhtar M. 2003. The Groundwater Economy of Pakistan. IWMI.

Tahir MA, Rasheed MH, Imran MS. (N.d.). water quality status in rural areas rural areas of Pakistan of Pakistan.

Wolegan V, Srarzenski. 1968. “Fresh and saline Groundwater zones in the Punjab Region of Weast Pakistan”. Addin zotero_item csl_citation.

Related Articles

Dietary Aloe vera improves growth and hematology in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

Fatima Khan*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 89-99, April 2026.

Intercropping camphor basil shrubs with selected food crops for ecosystem services in the upper midland agroecological zone of Western Kenya

Reuben K. B. Chumba*, Alex Awiti, Francis Namasaka Muyekho, Vitalis Ogemah, Jacob Omollo, Yosef Kidane Gebrehawariat, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 73-88, April 2026.

Surveillance and detection of African swine fever on abbatoir in different municipalities of third district of Cagayan, Philippines

Maricel F. Campanano, John Michael M. Melad, Mary Ann M. Santos*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 65-72, April 2026.

Mobile-based potato leaf disease identifier using ensemble modeling

Karen W. Cantilang*, Laarni M. Ladiao, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 58-64, April 2026.

Diagnostic analysis of pig farms in the North of Côte d’Ivoire: Case of the commune of Korhogo

Seni Kouadio Sylvain*, Kadjo Vincent, Alla Konan Jean Bedel, Yao Koffi Sylvanus Aubert, N’glouan Wadjé Jérôme, Soro Ouation Souleymane, Kouassi Koffi Dongo, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 48-57, April 2026.

Coral reef condition in Illana Bay, Zamboanga del Sur, Philippines: Basis for conservation management

Ruel S. Lasagas, Rosanilio M. Yagos*, Edgardo H. Rosales, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 40-47, April 2026.

Preliminary floral and faunal species diversity in Maluyo River in Santol, La Union, Philippines

Judith M. Morales*, Analyn V. Sagun, Angelina T. Gonzales, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 26-39, April 2026.

Challenges and impact of the farmer-scientists training program on community development in Bohol, Philippines

Jeffrey O. Awas*, Anabel J. Intong, Aida T. Salingay, Manolito C. Macalolot, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 8-25, April 2026.