Effect of bio and mineral nitrogen fertilization on growth and quality of some sugar beet cultivars

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/03/2021
Views (639)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effect of bio and mineral nitrogen fertilization on growth and quality of some sugar beet cultivars

AA Kandil, AEM Sharief, AMA Abdullah
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 18(3), 1-10, March 2021.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2021; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at a private farm in Sharkia Governorate, Egypt, during 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 seasons to study the effect of bio and mineral nitrogen fertilization on growth and quality of some sugar beet cultivars. Each field experiment was carried out in split split-plot design with four replicates. The main-plots were occupied with cultivars (Hossam, Asus poly and Glorious). The sub-plots were allocated with biofertilization treatments i.e. treated Phosphorin, Cerealine and Potassiumag (450 g/fed of each) and control treatment. The sub sub-plots were devoted with nitrogen levels (70, 90 and 110kg N/fed). The results showed that Hossam cultivar significantly surpassed other cultivars in root fresh weight at 120 and 150 DFS, CGR, RGR and quality parameters. However, Asus poly cultivar registered the highest values of foliage fresh weight and LAI at 120 and 150 DFS. Treated soil with Cerealine produced the highest values of all studied growth attributes and quality characters. Fertilizing with 110kg N/fed resulted in the highest values of growth characters, followed by 90kg/fed and lastly 70kg N/fed. Whereas, fertilizing 90kg N/fed produced the best results of quality characters. It can be concluded that in order to maintain high growth and root quality of sugar beet at the same time reduce production costs and environmental pollution, it can be recommended that fertilizing Hossam cultivar with 90kg N/fed and treating soil with Cerealine under the environmental conditions similar to study region.

Abdelaal KAA, Tawfik SF. 2015. Response of sugar beet plant (Beta vulgaris L.) to mineral nitrogen fertilization and bio-fertilizers. Intern. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci 4(9), 677-688.

Abido WAE, Ibrahim MEM. 2017. Role of foliar spraying with biostimulants substances in decreasing mineral nitrogen fertilizer of sugar beet . J. Plant Production Mansoura Univ., Vol. 8(12), 1335-1343.

Ahmed AZ, Awadalla AO, Abazid SR. 2017. Possibility of sugar beet production in Toshka Region. I-Assessment of the optimum harvesting age. J. Plant Production, Mansoura Univ 8(12), 1409-1415.

Aly EFA, Enan SAAM, Badr AI. 2015. Response of sugar beet varieties to soil drench of compost tea and nitrogen fertilization in sandy soil. J. Agric. Res. Kafr El-Sheikh Univ 41(4), 1322-1338.

Carruthers A, Oldfield JFT. 1960. Methods for the assessment of beet quality. Int. Sugar J 63, 72-74.

El-Emary FAA. 2017. Botanical characteristics of some sugar beet varieties (Beta vulgaris L): comparative study. J. Plant Production, Mansoura Univ 8(3), 397-403.

FAO. 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization. Faostat, FAO Statistics Division, March, 2020. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data /QC.

Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Ed., Jhon Wiley and Sons Inc., New York pp. 95-109.

Hussein MM, Hanan MH, Siam S, Mahmoud SA, Taalab AS. 2016. Mineral status, growth and yield response of sugar beet (Beta vulagaris L.) to nitrogen fertilizer sources and water regime. Adv. in Environ. Bio 9(27), 1-11.

Jackson ML. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentica Hall Inc, Engleweed Cliffs, N.J.

Leilah AA, Abdel-Moneam MA, Shalaby GA, Abdou MAE, AbdEl-Salam HM. 2017. Effect of plant population and distribution and nitrogen levels on yield and quality of sugar beet. J. Plant Production, Mansoura Univ 8(5), 591-597.

Makhlouf BSI, Abd El-All AEA. 2017. Effect of deficit irrigation, nitrogen and potassium fertilization on sugar beet productivity in sandy soils. Menoufiya J. Plant Prod 2 (6), 325-346.

Marajan WA, Hadad MA, Gafer MO, Sulfab HA, Ali MA. 2017. Effect of mineral and bio-organic fertilizers on sugar beet growth under semi-arid zone. Intern. J. of Sci. and Res., (IJSR) 6(9), 1020-1025.

Marschner H. 1995. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic press San Diego, USA.

Mekdad AAA. 2015. Sugar beet productivity as affected by nitrogen fertilizer and foliar spraying with boron. Intern. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci 4(4), 181-196.

Mohamed HY, El-Mansoub MMA, Ali AMK. 2019. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization levels on Cercospora leaf spot disease, yield and quality of some sugar beet varieties. J. Biol. Chem. Environ. Sci 14(2), 167-194.

Mohamed HY, El-Sebai TN. 2019. Effect of bio-stimulant (phosphate solubilizing microorganisms) on yield and quality of some sugar beet varieties. Egypt. J. of App. Sci 34(7), 114-129.

Nemeata Alla HEA, Sasy AH, Helmy SAM. 2018. Effect of potassium humate and nitrogen fertilization on yield and quality of sugar beet in sandy soil. J. Plant Production, Mansoura Univ 9(4), 333-338.

Nemeata Alla HEA. 2016. Yield and quality of sugar beet as affected by sowing date, nitrogen level and foliar spraying with calcium. J. Agric. Res. Kafr El-Sheikh Univ 42(1), 170-188.

Radford`s PJ. 1967. Growth analysis formulae, their use and abuse. Crop Sci 7, 171-175.

Sayed-Ahmed IF, Abdel Aziz RM, Rashed SH. 2016. Effect of bio and mineral fertilization on yield and quality of sugar beet in newly reclaimed lands in Egypt. Intern. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci 5(10), 980-991.

Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. 1980. Statistical Methods. 7th Ed. The Iowa State Univ. Press, Iowa, USA.

Thalooth AT, Tawfik MM, Badre EA, Mohamed MH. 2019. Yield and quality response of some sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) varieties to humic acid and yeast application in newly reclaimed soil. Middle East J. of Agric. Res 8(1), 56-65.

Watson DJ. 1958. The dependence of net assimilation rate on leaf area index. Ann. Bot. Lond. NS 22, 37-54.

Zaki MS, El-Sarag EI, Maamoun HA, Mubarak MH. 2018. Agronomic performance sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in Egypt using inorganic, organic and biofertilizers. Egypt. J. Agron 40(1), 89-103.

Related Articles

Botanical-based strategies for sustainable whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) management and tomato leaf curl virus suppression

P. G. Maina, R. K. Birithia, G. N. Kamotho, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(2), 1-11, August 2025.

Intertidal seagrass habitat and its macroinvertebrate assemblages in Baylimango, Dapitan City

MA. Dulce C. Guillena, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 16-26, July 2025.

Impact of moisture pit planting on growth and yield of upland Taro [Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott]: A climate-smart strategy

J. K. Macharia, T. E. Akuja, D. M. Mushimiyimana, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 8-15, July 2025.

Effects of three essential oils on the phytohormones production against Magnaporthe oryzae B.C. Couch, A rice blast pathogen

Ouattara Souleymane, Sama Hemayoro, Sérémé Abdoulaye, Koita Kadidia, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 1-7, July 2025.

Boro rice cultivation practices and adaptive strategies of farmers to flash floods in Sylhet haor basin

Nurunnaher Akter, Md. Rafiqul Islam, Md. Abdul Karim, Md. Giashuddin Miah, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 7-18, June 2025.

Technology adoption and its impact on environmental and socioeconomic outcomes for vegetable producers in Svay Rieng Province, Cambodia

Hong Chhun, Chun Nimul, Buntong Borarin, Serey Mardy, Sao Vibol, Chan Bunyeth, Tum Saravuth, Ros Vanchey, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 1-6, June 2025.

Effect of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) border crop on the control of cotton bollworms

Lovemore Mutaviri, Washington Mubvekeri, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 122-127, May 2025.