Development and disaster risk reduction: a case study of Bagrot Valley in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan
Paper Details
Development and disaster risk reduction: a case study of Bagrot Valley in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan
Abstract
This paper draws from an anthropological study (multi-sited ethnography) of disasters in the Central Karakoram National Park (CKNP), Gilgit-Baltistan with a major focus on perceptions amongst dwellers in the CKNP region about disasters as well as development. The data comes from field work, in-depth interviews and focused group discussions in four valleys including the Bagrot valley near Gilgit. The high mountain communities of the Karakoram have lived in agro-pastoral settings with unique socio-cultural legacy and limited mobility. Dwellers of the valleys have received outside interventions cautiously with a gradual approach and have been able to appropriate the development projects in their contexts with varying degrees of resistance. The dynamics have however changed ensuing the culmination of local kingdoms replaced by government institutions, opening of the Karakoram highway and intervention by Non-Governmental Organizations such as AKRSP. Another dimension of development is the evolution of an institutional mechanism grounded within the valley. The rhetorics about disasters and associated risks are also changing from a predominant notion about disaster as “Act of God” to the concept of mitigation, prevention and preparedness. For the community of Bagrot, the development agenda oscillates between culture, environment and modernity. On one hand Bagrot community is in a bid to regain the ecology of 1970s or before i.e. forests all around with less risks from floods and on the other hand a progressive society of 21st century where the young generation is capable of embracing emerging challenges whilst keeping the cultural values intact.
Ahmed IMZ. 2013. Blessong or curse: The stablizing role of remittance, foreign aid and FDI to Pakistan. Discussion Paper: Center for European Governance and Economic Development Research, 1-34. Georg Augustus Universitat: Gottingen.
Ambro G. 2006. Defining Local Ownership: A Grounded theory approach from Aga Khan Rural Support Programm e’s projects in Baltistan. Thesis submitted to the Norwegian University of Life Sciences for MS in Economics and Resource Management. Norway. Retrieved March 17, 2015, from www.umb.no/statisk/akrsp/06_publications_and_presentations/03_phd_and_masters_theses/geir_fulltext.pdf
Bangash FB. 2015. Tackling risks of glacial lake outburst floods in Pakistan’s north. Pamir Times. Gilgit. Retrieved from www.pamirtimes.net/2015/01/22/tackling-risks-of-glacial-lake-outburst-floods-in-pakistans-north/
Bennett J. 1998. Development Alternatives: NGO-Government Partnership in Pakista. Islamabad: Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI).
Benz A. 2013. Education and development in the Karakoram: Educational expansions and its impacts in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. Erdkunde 67(2), 123-136.
Donovan A. 2012. Earthquakes and Volcanoes: Risk from Geophysical hazards. In R. H. S. Roeser,Handbook of Risk Theory (341-367).
Dunsby R. 2013. Welcome to the Bagrot Valley. Safar. Retrieved from www.lvcf.co.uk/documents/The%20Bagrote%20Valley1.pdf
Elgin-Cossart JS. 2013. Why Would Peace Be Controversial at the United Nations? Negotiations Toward a Post-2015 Development Framework. New York: New York University- Center on International cooperation. www.cic.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/negotiations_post_2015_dev_framework.pdf
Hannigon J. 2012. Disasters without borders- The International politics of natural disasters. Cambridge: Polity Press.
John H. 2012. Disasters without Borders: The International Politics of Natural Disasters. New York: Polity Press. 195 pp.
Hirvonen P. 2005. Why Recent Increases in Development Aid Fail to Help the Poor. Retrieved from Global Policy Forum: www.globalpolicy.org/empire/45056-stingy-samaritans.html
Hunzai I. 2013. Conflict dynamics in Gilgit-Baltistan. NY: United States Institute of Peace (UNIPS). Retrieved January 5, 2015, from www.usip.org/sites/default/files/SR321.pdf
Hussain I. 2003. Lessons for poverty reduction: The experience of Aga Khan Rural Support Programme. (p. 9). Karachi: Institute of Business Administration. http://ishrathusain.iba.edu.pk/speeches/povertyReduction/Lesson_Poverty_Dec-15-2003.pdf
Ibrahim DN. 1994. The appropriateness of community based programme: A case study of the AKRSP in two villages of Gilgit District. The Pakistan Development Review 33(4), 1273-1298.
Khan SS. 1991. Non-Governmental Organization alternatives and fresh initiatives in extension: The Aga Khan Rural Support Program experience. 249-261. Retrieved from www.rrojasdatabank.info/12agrisym/agrisym257-269.pdf
Kronstadt SB. 2013. Pakistan: U.S. Foreign Assistance. CRS Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service. www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R41856.pdf
Lead 2013. Lead Update. Retrieved from Lead Pakistan: www.lead.org.pk/attachments/updates/349.pdf
Khan MT. 2012. Corruption: Causes and Effects in Pakistan’s Case (A Review Research). International Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences 2(06), 79-91.
Mac Donald KI. 1998. Rationality‚ Representation‚ and the Risk Mediating Characteristics of a Karakoram Mountain Farming System. Human Ecology 26(2), 287-321.
McMichael P. 2010. Contesting Development- Critical struggle for social change. New York: Routledge.
Nancy-Birdsall MV. 2012. More Money More Problems: A 2012 Assessment of the US Approach to development in Pakistan. Washington DC: Center for Global Development.
Reuters. 2015. Mountain watch groups save lives in flood-prone Pakistan valleys. Reuters. Retrieved from www.uk.reuters.com/article/2015/03/10/ukdisaster-risk-pakistan-idUKKBN0M60E920150310
Schmidt M. 2000. The utilization of Mountain Forests in Bagrote Valleys.In A. D. (Ed), Mountain Societies in Transition. Contributions to the Cultural Geography of The Karakorum (p. 211-234). Koln: Koppe.
Settle A. 2010. Contested Aims, Contested Strategies: New Development Paradigm through the lens of the AKRSP. Retrieved from SDPI: www.sdpi.org/publications/files/Microsoft%20Word%20-%20A114.pdf
Sokefeld M. 2012. The Attabad landslide and the politics of disaster in Gojal, Gilgit-Baltistan. In U. L. (Ed), Negotiating Disasters: Politics, Representation, Meanings (177-207 p). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Sokefeld M. 2014. Anthropology of Gilgit-Baltistan: Introduction. Ethnoscript, 9-29.
Stöber G. 2007. Religious Identities Provoked: The Gilgit ‘Textbook Controversy’ and its Conflictual Context’. Internationale Schulbuchforschung, 389-411.
UNDP. 2013. United National Development Program. Retrieved from GLOF Project: www.undp.org/content/dam/…/projects/…/ECCU_GLOF_APR_2013.doc.
Walter AM. 2014. Changing Gilgit-Baltistan: Perceptions of the recent history. Ethnoscripts, 31-49.
World Bank. 2001. World Development Report 2011- Conflict, Security and Development. Washington DC: World Bank. Retrieved from www.openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/4389/9780821384398_overview.pdf
Zain OF. 2010. A Socio-Political Study of Gilgit-Baltistan Province. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences 30(1), 181-190.
Sultan Ahmed, Rehmat Karim, Dr. Najma Najam, Faqeer Muhammad (2016), Development and disaster risk reduction: a case study of Bagrot Valley in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan; JBES, V9, N5, November, P96-104
https://innspub.net/development-and-disaster-risk-reduction-a-case-study-of-bagrot-valley-in-gilgit-baltistan-pakistan/
Copyright © 2016
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0