Effect of feeding mulberry multinutrient blocks on feed intake of maize stover in calves

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2016
Views (355) Download (225)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effect of feeding mulberry multinutrient blocks on feed intake of maize stover in calves

Ishrat Roomi
Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.8( 2), 75-81, February 2016.
Certificate: IJAAR 2016 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

An experiment was conducted consisting of two cattle breeds and two diets. Eight Sahiwal and eight Achai calves (6-10months age) were housed in individual pens and were offered a basal diet of maize stover ad libitum. Each of the breed groups was randomly divided in to two equal subgroups, control and treatment (4 calves/group). The control group was not given any supplement and the treatment group was given free access to mulberry multinutrient block (MMB). The control and MMB calves daily consumed 1.65 and 1.63 Kg/100Kg body weight (BWT) maize stover dry matter (DM) and 1.65 and 2.29Kg/100Kg BWT total feed DM, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that the maize stover intake was not influenced by diet (P>0.05) while total feed intake was higher (P<0.001) with MMB diet. The intake of maize stover and MMB were same in Sahiwal and Achai and did not affect by the breed (P>0.05). Achai calves consumed more (P<0.05) MMB than Sahiwal calves (9.56 vs 7.00g/Kg BWT). Mean ammonia-N in the rumen fluid of calves varied due to diet (P<0.0001) and breed (P<0.05). Rumen ammonia concentration averaged 64.12 and 148.04mg N/l on control and MMB diets, respectively and 123.59 and 94.57mg N/l in Sahiwal and Achai calves, respectively. It was concluded that MMB was effective in increasing total feed intake of maize stover based diets in the calves and was palatable also. Due to low cost of MMB (as mulberries are abundantly available in the season), feeding of MMB to ruminant livestock in Gilgit Baltistan of Pakistan is recommended.

VIEWS 20

Alvi AS, Sharif M. 1995. Arid zone agriculture and research in Pakistan. Progressive farming 15, 5-12.

AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. Association of analytical chemists. Hoerwitz, W. (ed). Washington D.C., U.S.A.

Badurdeen AL, Ibrahim MNM, Ranwana SSE. 1994. Methods to improve utilization of rice straw. III. Effects of urea ammonia treatment and molasses urea blocks supplementation on intake, digestibility, rumen and blood parameters. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 7(3), 363-372.

Beg GA. 2010. ‘Current status of pastoral systems in Gilgit-Baltistan and Chitral, Pakistan’. In Kretzmann H, Abdulalishoev K, Lu Zhaohui, Richter J (eds) Pastoralism and rangeland management in mountain areas in the context of climate and global change; Regional workshop in Khorog and Kashgar 14-21 July 2010. pp214. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit, Feldafing (Germany) Bittner C, Paul D, Methke D, Wachter T. 2008 Land use in Shigar Valley. Freie University Berlin.

Ben   Salem   H,    Nefzaoui   A,    Makkar    HPS. 2007. Feed supplementation blocks for increased utilization of tanniniferous forages by ruminants. In (Editors: Makkar, H. P. S., Sanchez, M. and Speedy, A. W.) Feed Supplementation blocks. Urea-molasses multinutrient blocks: simple and effective feed supplement technology for ruminant agriculture. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 164, 1-12.

Faiza MU. 2000. Effect of feeding untreated or ammoniated maize stover with or without urea molasses block supplementation on nutrients digestibility and feed intake in cow calves. M.Sc. (Hons), Thesis, Faculty of Animal husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, KPK. Agricultural University Peshawar.

FAO. 1987 Pakistan’s experience in rangeland rehabilitation and improvement. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome pp70.

Jalal-ud-Din. 1991. Effect of supplementing a basal diet of wheat straw and minerals with urea or urea-molasses block on feed intake and digestion Kinetics. M.Sc (Hons) Thesis, Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences. KPK. Agricultural University Peshawar.

Leng RA. 1990. Factors affecting the utilization of poor quality forage by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions. Nutritional research reviews 3, 277-303.

Makkar HPS. 2007. Feed supplementation block technology – past, present and future. In (Editors: Makkar H P S, Sanchez M and Speedy A W.) Feed Supplementation Blocks. Urea-molasses multinutrient blocks: simple and effective feed supplement technology for ruminant agriculture. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 164, 1-12.

Mehra UR, Challa J, Singh UB. 1991. Effect of supplementation of urea-molasses mineral block and wheat bran in a wheat bhoosa based diet on growth performance and nutrient utilization in buffalo calves. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 44, 522-525.

Preston TR, Leng RA. 1984. Supplementation of diets based on fibrous residues and by products. In Sundstrol, F. and E. Owens. (eds.). Straw and other fibrous by-products as feed. Elsevier, Amsterdam pp 373-413.

Saeed I. 2000. Associative effect of molasses urea block supplement and forage quality on nutrient digestion and nitrogen retention in sheep. M.Sc. Thesis. KPK. Agricultural University Peshawar.

Sarwar M, Khan MA, Iqbal Z. 2002. Feed Resources for Livestock in Pakistan. Status Paper. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 4, 186-192.

Satler LD, Slyter LL. 1974. Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro. British Journal of Nutrition 32, 199-210.

Shahab-ud-Din. 1992. Comparative effect of urea molasses block lick on feed intake and body weight gain in buffalo calves and cow calves fed a basal diet of wheat straw. M.Sc (Hons), Thesis, Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, KPK. Agricultural University Peshawar.

Steel RGD, Torrie JH. 1980. Principle and procedures of statistics. Graw-Hill, M.C. Book Co., U.S.A.

Tiwari SP, Singh UB, Mehra UR. 1990.  Urea molasses mineral blocks as a feed supplement: effect on growth and nutrient utilization in buffalo calves. Animal Feed Science and Technology 29(3-4), 333-241.

Van  Soest PJ. 1982.  Nutritional ecology  of  the ruminants. Durban and Downey Inc. Port land Oregon U.S.A.