Assessment of fungal diseases on corn under various farming cultural practices

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2016
Views (937)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Assessment of fungal diseases on corn under various farming cultural practices

Rico A. Marin, Mellprie B. Marin
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 9(1), 63-72, July 2016.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2016; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

A study was conducted to assess the fungal diseases of corn under various management practices. The study was laid out in split-split plot arrangement in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with fertilizer treatments as the main plot. The hedgerow pruning treatments represented the sub-plot while mulching treatments were assigned to represent the sub-subplot. Findings show that the three common fungal diseases infecting corn include corn rust, Stenocarpella leaf blight and Physoderma brown spot. For corn rust, all the treatments were categorized as susceptible. Those applied with biofertilizer had the lowest rust infection with 66.20% and 65.78% for the first and second cropping period, respectively. Host reaction for Stenocarpella leaf blight among the treatments was categorized as moderately resistant. Similarly, those applied with biofertilizer had the lowest mean percent severity of 2.12% for the first cropping and 13.18% for the second cropping period. As for Physoderma brown spot, host reaction was categorized as resistant to the disease in the first cropping while this was absent in the second cropping period. The treatment without fertilizer application had the highest severity rating of Physoderma brown spot. In terms of hedgerow pruning and mulching practices, no significant difference was noted among the treatments. However, general findings revealed that the treatment with biofertilizer application showed the lowest mean percent severity of the three fungal diseases identified on the alley crop. These findings could be attributed to the beneficial effects of biofertilizer to resist pest and diseases when applied to crops.

Alejandro FR, Cena RL, Tangonan NG, Maarat CA, Solilap EL, Escalante WB. 2002. USM var 9 and USM var 14: New open-pollinated varieties of corn. USM R & D Journal 10 (1), 1-10.

Altieri MA, Letourneau DK, Davis JR. 1983. Developing sustainable agroecosystems. BioScience. American Institute of Biological Sciences. University of California, Berkeley, CA 33(1), 45-49.

Asaduzzaman SM. 2000. Effect of biomass incorporation and crop combination in mitigating scouring problem in an alley cropping system. Ph.D. Dissertation, College Laguna, Philippines: University of the Philippines, 163.

Galindo JJ, Abawi GS, Thurston HD, Galvez G. 1982. Effect of mulching on web blight of beans in Costa Rica. Disease Control and Pest management. The American Phytological Society 73(4), 609-615.

Girma H, Rao MR, Sithanantham S. 2000. Insect pests and beneficial arthropods population under different hedgerow intercropping systems in semiarid Kenya. Agroforestry Systems 50(30), 279-292.

Huia-Gu C, Qi-Guang C, Gui-Lin X, Wei L, Ai-Xiang Z, Han-Shou Y, Jin-Sheng W. 2010. Composition of wheat rhizosphere antagonistic bacteria and wheat sharp eyespot as affected by rice straw mulching. Pedosphere 20(4), 505-514.

Jee HJ. 2007. Current status of bio-fertilizers and bio-pesticides development, farmer’s acceptance and their utilization in Korea. FFTC. Ext. Bull 601, 1-8.

Mayee CD, Datar VV. 1986. Phytopathometry. Dept. of Plant Pathology, Marathwada. Agriculture University, Parbhani. Technical Bulletin 1(3), 431 – 432.

Raymundo ME. 1985. Experience, problem and prospects in the adaptation of soil taxonomy in the Philippines. Unpublished report.

Sarian ZB. 2008. A recently introduced biofertilizer produced by Japanese and Taiwanese scientists is performing very well under local experiments. Manila Bulletin.

Sarian ZB. 2010. More of us should eat corn. http://www.agribusinessweek.com/tag/ cornmaize.

Visco RG. 1997. Effect of different management practices in a kakawate (Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp) based-alley cropping system on surface erosion, soil fertility and crop yield. Ph.D. Dissertation, College, Laguna, Philippines: University of the Philippines, 116.

Yardim EN, Edwards CA. 2003. Effects of organic and synthetic fertilizer sources on pest and predatory insects associated with tomatoes. Phytoparasitica 31(4), 324-329.

Yu-Tzu H, Tse-Chi S and Shaw-Yhi H. 2009. Soil fertility management and pest responses: a comparison of organic and synthetic fertilization. Journal of Economic Entomology 102(1), 160-169.

Related Articles

Boro rice cultivation practices and adaptive strategies of farmers to flash floods in Sylhet haor basin

Nurunnaher Akter, Md. Rafiqul Islam, Md. Abdul Karim, Md. Giashuddin Miah, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 7-18, June 2025.

Technology adoption and its impact on environmental and socioeconomic outcomes for vegetable producers in Svay Rieng Province, Cambodia

Hong Chhun, Chun Nimul, Buntong Borarin, Serey Mardy, Sao Vibol, Chan Bunyeth, Tum Saravuth, Ros Vanchey, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 1-6, June 2025.

Effect of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) border crop on the control of cotton bollworms

Lovemore Mutaviri, Washington Mubvekeri, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 122-127, May 2025.

Pruning and population density as smart solution to sustainable tomato production

Reychel I. Wamel, Artemio A. Martin Jr., Victoriano V. Casco, Lucila V. Rocha, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 99-112, May 2025.

Enhancing growth and yield of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) through fertilizer supplementation strategies

Catherine N. Payadon, Artemio A. Martin Jr., Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 83-98, May 2025.

Propagation techniques and organic fertilizer supplementation on growth and tuber yield of yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius)

Frimalyn P. De Vera, Artemio A. Martin Jr., Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 66-82, May 2025.

Bio-efficacy of different neem formulations against onion armyworm (Spodoptera exigua)

Roan Joy P. Tubera, Artemio A. Martin, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 55-65, May 2025.