Investigation of collection and disposal of solid waste on Islamic Azad University of Roudehen Branch

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/04/2015
Views (714)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Investigation of collection and disposal of solid waste on Islamic Azad University of Roudehen Branch

Mina Mackialeagha, Maryam Farahani
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 6(4), 21-25, April 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Collection and disposal of solid waste is considered serious environmental problem in modern society. The Coordination of knowledge and experience through proper management framework are necessary to resolve this problem. The objective of this study was to evaluate the composition and characteristics of the generated university solid waste in order to obtain information about the quantity of recoverable solid waste at Azad University of Roudehen Branch. Solid waste sampling and laboratory analysis were carried out according to the random sampling method .The sampling plan was according to random truck sampling which was determined by considering the available facilities and background information of the site location. The first step in waste characterization was to obtain the detail information about the percentage of each individual component in the waste stream. So, separation and measurement of waste were carried out in any place in the autumn, winter and spring. Then, the results were analyzed using SPSS software. The results showed; the daily production rate of the University’s solid waste was 50.33 kg. The educational buildings were the most responsible for producing the waste stream of the campus by 58.2 %. The dining rooms and kitchen were the next of ranking by 28.2% and 10.2%, respectively. Also, the laboratories and the other building were with 2%. The main compositions of the daily generated waste were 62.55% paper, 17.9% plastic, and 5% metal and 14.4 other. Sum up, the maximum of the waste of the university is related to paper which is recyclable with economic value.

ASTM. 1988. Standard test method for determination of the composition of unprocessed municipal solid waste. ASTM standard d 5231-5292 (Reapproved 1998). American Society for Testing and Materials. U.S.

Farzadkia M, Dalvand A, Taghdisi MH. 2008. Evaluation of economic and environmental aspects of paper and paperboard recycling from municipal solid wastes of Isfahan city. Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 10(3), 237-46.

Gawaikar V, Deshpande VP. 2006. Source Specific Quantification and Characterization of Municipal Solid Waste – a Review. IE(I) Journal-EN 86, 33-38.

Gent M, Menendez M, Torano J, Torno S. 2011. Optimization of the recovery of plastics for recycling by density media separation cyclone resources. Conservation and Recycling, 55, 472-482.

Kalanatarifard A, Yang GS. 2012. Identification of the Municipal Solid Waste Characteristics and Potential of Plastic Recovery at Bakri Landfill, Muar, Malaysia. Journal of Sustainable Development 5( 7), 11-17.

Omran A, Mahmood A, Abdul Aziz H, Robinson GM.2009. Investigating Households Attitude Toward Recycling of Solid Waste in Malaysia: A Case Study. International Journal of Environmental Research 3(2), 275-288, Spring.

Omran A, Sarsour AK & Kadir Pakir AH.2012. An investigation into the factors influencing the participation of households in recycling of solid waste in Palestine. International Journal of Health Economics 2, 4-19.

Post J L.2007. Solid waste management in Jamaica: an investigation into waste. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of science in civil engineering. MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY.

UNPD.2010. Solid waste management and composting in Beit Lahia – Project Document United Nations Development Program.

Related Articles

General characteristics of the mycobiota of vegetable and melon plants cultivated in Azerbaijan

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva*, A. Kh. Rajabli, E. I. Allahverdiyev, A. G. Eyvazov, S. F. Azadaliyeva, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 139-145, April 2026.

Comparative assessment of plant biomass in the climatic zones of Burkina Faso

Alimata Zorom*, Yélézouomin Stéphane Corentin Somé, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 129-138, April 2026.

Ethnomedicinal plant knowledge of the Manobo indigenous people in Agusan del Sur, Philippines

Ferdinand A. Dumalagan*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 117-128, April 2026.

Exploitation and threat traits of the Hoplobatrachus occipitalis community, an economically important frog in the Poro region, Northern Côte d’Ivoire

Kien Kouassi Brahiman*, Aka Sesseho Guy Roger, Ndiaye Awa, Kouamelan Essetchi Paul, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 108-116, April 2026.

Species richness and conservation status of ferns (Pteridophyta) in Barangay New Casul, Mutia, Zamboanga del Norte

Jay Anne B. Mejos, Aljun P. Pusod, Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 100-107, April 2026.

Dietary Aloe vera improves growth and hematology in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

Fatima Khan*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 89-99, April 2026.

Intercropping camphor basil shrubs with selected food crops for ecosystem services in the upper midland agroecological zone of Western Kenya

Reuben K. B. Chumba*, Alex Awiti, Francis Namasaka Muyekho, Vitalis Ogemah, Jacob Omollo, Yosef Kidane Gebrehawariat, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 73-88, April 2026.

Surveillance and detection of African swine fever on abbatoir in different municipalities of third district of Cagayan, Philippines

Maricel F. Campanano, John Michael M. Melad, Mary Ann M. Santos*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 65-72, April 2026.