Biodiversity of drought resistance and indirect selection in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2015
Views (726)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Biodiversity of drought resistance and indirect selection in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes

Leila Fahmideh, Hajir Beheshtizadeh, Ahmad Reza Golparvar, Saeed Salehi
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 6(6), 407-410, June 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Determination of the biodiversity, drought resistance indices and identify the resistant genotypes, were achieved using ten spring safflower cultivars. The cultivars were sown at drought and non-drought stress conditions in the layout randomized completely block design with three replications during 2013-2014 farming season. Assessment of simple correlation coefficients among drought resistance indices and seed yield of cultivars showed that geometric mean of productivity (GMP) and stress tolerance index (STI) enable to identify cultivars having a high potential yield and tolerance to drought stress and because of that were recognized as the best resistance indices. Biplot graphical display designed that Sterling, Nebrasks10, land race Kuseh and Gila is the most drought resistance cultivars and U.S.10 is the most drought susceptible. Classification of cultivars using biplot analysis revealed that crosses between Sterling, Nebraska10, Landrace Kuseh and Gila with S149 cultivars having maximum genetic distance are qualified to recommendation for genetic improvement of yield potential and drought resistance via selection in spring safflower cultivars.

Abolhasani Kh, Saeidi G. 2006. Evaluation of drought tolerance of safflower lines based on tolerance and sensitivity indices to water stress. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 10(3), 419-422.

Arslan B. 2010. Assessing of heritability and variance components of yield and some agronomic traits of different safflower cultivars. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 6(3), 554-557.

Ashkani J, Pakniyat H, Ghotbi V. 2012. Genetic evaluation of several physiological traits for screening of suitable spring safflower genotypes under stress and non-stress irrigation regimes. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 10(14), 2320-2326.

Farshadfar A, Zamani MR, Motallebi M, Imam-jomeh A. 2001. Selection for drought resistance in Chickpea lines. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 32, 65-77.

Fernandez GC. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In proceeding of a symposium, Taiwan, 13-18 Aug, 257-270 p.

Fischer RA, Maurer R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I, grown yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 897-912.

Golparvar AR. 2003. Genetic analysis of drought resistance in bread wheat cultivars. Ph.D. Thesis. Islamic Azad University, Science and research branch of Tehran. 286 p.

Kristin AS, Serna RR, Perez FI, Enriquez BC, Gallegos JAA, Vallejo PR, Wassimi N, Kelley JD. 1997. Improving common bean performance under drought stress. Crop Science 37, 43-50.

Passioura JB. 1996. Drought and drought tolerance. Plant Growth Regulation 20, 79-83.

Purdad SS. 2004. Assessment of drought resistance in safflower lines and cultivars in spring planting. Proceedings of the 8th Iranian congress of crop production and plant breeding. 24.

Quarrie SA, Stojanovic J, Pekic S. 1999. Improving drought tolerance in small-grained cereals: A case study, progress and prospects. Plant Growth Regulation 29, 1-21.

Richards RA. 1996. Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought. Plant Growth Regulation 20, 157-166.

Rosielle AT, Hambelen J. 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Science 21, 943-945.

Related Articles

Species richness and conservation status of ferns (Pteridophyta) in Barangay New Casul, Mutia, Zamboanga del Norte

Jay Anne B. Mejos, Aljun P. Pusod, Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 100-107, April 2026.

Dietary Aloe vera improves growth and hematology in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

Fatima Khan*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 89-99, April 2026.

Intercropping camphor basil shrubs with selected food crops for ecosystem services in the upper midland agroecological zone of Western Kenya

Reuben K. B. Chumba*, Alex Awiti, Francis Namasaka Muyekho, Vitalis Ogemah, Jacob Omollo, Yosef Kidane Gebrehawariat, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 73-88, April 2026.

Surveillance and detection of African swine fever on abbatoir in different municipalities of third district of Cagayan, Philippines

Maricel F. Campanano, John Michael M. Melad, Mary Ann M. Santos*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 65-72, April 2026.

Mobile-based potato leaf disease identifier using ensemble modeling

Karen W. Cantilang*, Laarni M. Ladiao, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 58-64, April 2026.

Diagnostic analysis of pig farms in the North of Côte d’Ivoire: Case of the commune of Korhogo

Seni Kouadio Sylvain*, Kadjo Vincent, Alla Konan Jean Bedel, Yao Koffi Sylvanus Aubert, N’glouan Wadjé Jérôme, Soro Ouation Souleymane, Kouassi Koffi Dongo, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 48-57, April 2026.

Coral reef condition in Illana Bay, Zamboanga del Sur, Philippines: Basis for conservation management

Ruel S. Lasagas, Rosanilio M. Yagos*, Edgardo H. Rosales, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 40-47, April 2026.

Preliminary floral and faunal species diversity in Maluyo River in Santol, La Union, Philippines

Judith M. Morales*, Analyn V. Sagun, Angelina T. Gonzales, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 26-39, April 2026.