Study of relationship between grain yield and yield components using multivariate analysis in barley cultivars (Hordeum vulgare L.)
Paper Details
Study of relationship between grain yield and yield components using multivariate analysis in barley cultivars (Hordeum vulgare L.)
Abstract
This experiment was performed to evaluate the correlation between grain yield and other characteristics of 20 cultivars and advanced breeding lines of barley in the Research Station, Agricultural collage, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications. Biological and grain yields and yield component were measured. Genotypic and phenotypic variation, mean comparison, correlation coefficient, regression and Path analysis were used for analysis of data. The Path analysis showed that the effects of spikes per square meter, kernel weight on grain yield were significantly different (p. Also the results showed spikes per square meter had a negative correlation with kernels per spike and kernel weight. Regression analysis confirmed that kernel per spike is the most important yield component and increasing it can be improved the grain yield.
Abay F, Waters-Bayer A, Bjørnstad A. 2008. Farmers’ seed management and Innovation in varietal selection: implications for barley breeding in Tigray, northern Ethiopia. Ambio 37(4), 312–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2008)3.7 FSMAII]2.0.CO;2
Adams MW. 1967. Basis of yield component compensation in crop plants with special reference to field bean, Phaseo-lus vulgaris. Crop Science 7, 505-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1967.0011183X000700050030x.
Bhatnger VK, Bhatnger SM, Sharma RC. 1977. Genetic variability and correlation coefficient in 6-rowed huskless barley. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 43, 355-358.
Bhatt GM. 1973. Significance of path coefficient analysis in determining the nature of character association. Euphytica 22, 338-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00022643
Chaudhary BD. 1977. Variability, correlations and path analysis in barley. Genetics 18, 325-330.
Dewey DR, Lu KH. 1959. A Correlation and Path-Coefficient Analysis of Components of Crested Wheat grass Seed Production. Journal of Agronomy 51, 515-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1959.00021962005100090002x
Darwinkel A, Hag BA, Kuizenga J. 1977. Effect of sowing date and seed rate on crop development and grain production of winter wheat. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 25, 83-94.
De Candolle A. 1895. Origin of cultivated plants. Reprint 1959. Nobel Offeset Printers, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.28259
Denis JC, Adams MW. 1978. Factor analysis of plant variables related to yield in dry beans. I. Morphological traits. Crop Science 18, 74-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1978.0011183X001 800010020x
Deniz B, Kavurmaci Z, Topal M. 2009. Determination of ontogenetic selection criteria for grain yield in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) by path-coefficient analysis. African Journal of Biotechnology 8, 2616-2622.
Doting WR, Knight CW. 1992. Alternative model for path analysis of small-grain yield. Crop Science 32, 487-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003 200020040x.
Ehdaie B, Waines JG. 1989. Genetic variation, heritability and path analysis in landraces of bread wheat from south western Iran. Euphytica 41, 183-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00021584.
Fathi GH, Rezaei K. 2000. Path analysis of grain yield and yield components for some barley cultivars in Ahvaz region. Agricultural Sciences and Technology 14(1), 39-48.
Feil B. 1992. Breeding progress in small grain cereals: A comparison of old and modern cultivars. Plant Breeding 108, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.14390523.1992.tb00093.x
Garcia del Moral LF, Ramos JM, Garcia del Moral MB, Jimeneztejada MP. 1991. Ontogenetic approach to grain production in spring barley based on path-coefficient analysis. Crop Science 31, 1179-1185. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100050021x
Grafius JE. 1978. Multiple characters and correlated response. Crop Science 18, 931-934. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1978.0011183X001 800060004x.
Gebeyehou G, Knott DR, Baker RJ. 1982. Rate and duration of grain filling in durum wheat cultivars. Crop Science 22, 337-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002 200020033x.
Hamza S, Hamida WB, Rebai A, Harrabi M. 2004. SSR-based genetic diversity assessment among Tunisian winter barley and relationship with morphological traits. Euphytica 135, 107-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:EUPH.0000009547.658 08.bf.
Miller JF, Hammond JJ, Roath WW. 1980. Comparison of inbred vs. single-cross testers and estimation of genetic effects in sunflower. Crop Science 20, 703-706. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1980.0011183X002000060007x.
Nerson H. 1980. Effects of population density and number of ears on wheat yield and its components. Field Crops Research 3, 225-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(80)90031-3.
Pakniyat H, Powell W, Baird E, Handley LL, Robinson D, Scrimgeour CM, Caligari PDS. 1997, AFLP variation in wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum C. Koch) with reference to salt tolerance and associated ecogeography. Genome 40(3), 332-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/g97-046.
Pakniyat H, Saed-Moucheshi A, Haddadi MH. 2013. Modeling and determination of relationship between kernel yield and its related traits in maize inbred lines and their hybrids using multiple regression and path coefficient analysis. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Science 5(5), 522-528.
Poehlman JM. 1985. Adaptation and distribution. In: Rasmusson. D.C. (ed.): Barley. Wisconsin, Madison, USA, New York 2-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr26.c1
Puri YP, Qualset CO, Williams WA. 1982. Evaluation of yield components as selection criteria in barley breeding. Crop Science 22, 927-931. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002 200050007x.
Qualset CO, Schaller CW, Williams JC. 1965.Performance of isogenic lines of barley as influenced by awn length, linkage blocks and environment. Crop Science 5, 489-495. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1965.0011183X000500060002x.
Saed-Moucheshi A, Fasihfar E, Hasheminasab H, Rahmani A, Ahmadi A. 2013a. A Review on Applied Multivariate Statistical Techniques in Agriculture and Plant Science. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production 4(1), 127-141.
SAS. 2009. SAS Version 9.2. SAS Institute Inc SAS Online Doc 913 SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.
Setotaw TA, Belayneh SG, Gwinner R, Ferreira JL. 2014. Developing selection criteria based on an ontogenetic path analysis approach to improve grain yield in barley. Genetics and molecular research 13(2), 4635-4646. http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/2014.June.18.6.
Simane B, Struik PC, Nachit MM, Peacock JM. 1993. Ontogenic analysis of field components and yield stability of durum wheat in water-limited environments. Euphytica 71, 211-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF0004041.
Singh TP, Singh KB. 1973. Association of grain yield and its components in segregation population of green gram. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 33, 113-119.
Singh RK, Chaudhary BD. 1985. Biometrical methods in quantitative analysis. India, New Delhi New Delhi, Kalyani Publishers 320-334.
Stoskopt NF, Nathaniel RK, Reinbergs E. 1974. Comparison of spring wheat and barley with winter wheat: yield components in Ontario. Journal of Agronomy 66, 747-750. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1974.00021962006600060011x.
Yap TC, Harvey BL. 1972. Inheritance of yield components and morphological traits in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Crop Science 12, 283-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1972.0011183X001 200030008x.
Saeideh Dorostkar, Hassan Pakniyat, Mahmood Ahmadi Kordshooli, Massumeh Aliakbari, Neda Sobhanian, Raziyeh Ghorbani, Masoud Eskandari (2015), Study of relationship between grain yield and yield components using multivariate analysis in barley cultivars (Hordeum vulgare L.); IJAAR, V6, N4, April, P240-250
https://innspub.net/study-of-relationship-between-grain-yield-and-yield-components-using-multivariate-analysis-in-barley-cultivars-hordeum-vulgare-l/
Copyright © 2015
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0