Effect of sowing dates on growth and yield of tropical sugar beet

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2015
Views (553)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effect of sowing dates on growth and yield of tropical sugar beet

Hossain Md. Ferdous, Qazi Abdul Khaliq, Abdul Karim
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 7(1), 53-60, July 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the research farm of the Department of Agronomy, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, from November 2011 to May 2012 to find out the growth pattern and optimum sowing date of tropical sugar beet in Bangladesh. The tropical sugar beet genotypes were Cauvery, Shubhra and EB0616, and sowing dates were 01 November, 15 November, 01 December and 15 December. The interaction effect of sowing dates and sugar beet genotypes was statistically significant in growth parameters like leave number, leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), root weight per plant, root yield. The highest root yield was obtained from genotypes EB0616 when sown on 01 November (103.5 t/ha) and 15 November (100 t/ha). The genotypes Cauvery and Shubhra gave identical root yield i.e., 90.27 t/ha and 92.86 t/ha, respectively on 01 November sowing. Root yield significantly decreased in all the three genotypes with the advancement of sowing dates from 01 November onwards. For high root yield the optimum sowing date for tropical sugar beet in Bangladesh seems to be in early November.

Abo-Salama AM, EL-Sayiad SL. 2000. Studies on some sugarbeet cultivars under Middle Egypt conditions: Response to sowing and harvesting dates. Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences 31(1), 137-159.

BRAC (Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee).  2010.  Project  report  on  sugarbee: cultivation, 13 – 16.

Badawi MA, EL-Agroudy MA, Attia AN. 2003. Effect of sowing dates and NPK fertilization on growth and yield of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris. L.). Journal of Agricultural Science 20(6), 2683 – 2689.

BSRI, 2005. Sugar beet cultivation in Bangladesh. Bangladesh  Sugarcane  Research  Institute,  Ishurdi. P10.

BSRI. 2011. Sugar beet cultivation in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Sugarcane Research Institute, Ishurdi, Pabna, Bangladesh. P 4.

Milford GFJ, Thorne GN. 1973. The effect of light and temperature late in the season on the growth of sugar-beet. Annals ofApplied Biology 75(3), 419-425.

Missa AL, Isoda A, Nojima H, Takasaki Y, Toshimerand T, Ishikawa T. 1994. Plant type of dry matter production in pea nut (Arachis hypogea L.) cultivers. I. Varietal difference in dry matter production. Japan Journal of Crop Science 62, 303-308.

Rahman MK, Kabir LM, Alam JM, Hossain SM, Islam RAKM. 2006. Sugarbeet cultivation in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Sugarcane Research Institute. Ishurdi, Pabna, Bangladesh, 1-7.

Rahman MK. 2011. Feasibility of sugar beet cultivation in Bangladesh: A Review. Bangladesh Sugarcane Research Institute. Ishurdi, Pabna, Bangladesh, 1-10.

Romaneckas K, Sarauskis E. 2003. The investigations of sugar beet seedbed by Kriz method (Sweden) under different soil tillage and sowing pattern. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 81(1), 67–74.

Syngenta, 2004. Syngenta Bangladesh Ltd. http// Sugarbeet.ucdavis.edu/ SBPM/Nutrients/ fig1. GIF. www. Sugarproducer.com, 2011. Sugar Producer Magazine

Theurer JC. 1979. Growth Patterns in Sugarbeet Production. Journal of American Society of Sugar Beet Technology 20(4), 343-367.

Tsialtas JT, Maslaris N. 2008. Seasonal trends and relationships of light, temperature and leaf physiological traits of sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.) grown under semi-arid, Mediterranean conditions. International Journal of Plant Production 2(3), 223-242.

Related Articles

Impact assessment on the ruminant livestock deworming extension project of the college of agriculture: Promoting healthy ruminant livestock in Taloctoc, Tanudan, Kalinga

Rex Saliw-an Langngag, Christopher Alejo Agustin, Cristine G. Liggayo, Maribel D. Cariño, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(2), 12-22, August 2025.

Botanical-based strategies for sustainable whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) management and tomato leaf curl virus suppression

P. G. Maina, R. K. Birithia, G. N. Kamotho, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(2), 1-11, August 2025.

Intertidal seagrass habitat and its macroinvertebrate assemblages in Baylimango, Dapitan City

MA. Dulce C. Guillena, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 16-26, July 2025.

Impact of moisture pit planting on growth and yield of upland Taro [Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott]: A climate-smart strategy

J. K. Macharia, T. E. Akuja, D. M. Mushimiyimana, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 8-15, July 2025.

Effects of three essential oils on the phytohormones production against Magnaporthe oryzae B.C. Couch, A rice blast pathogen

Ouattara Souleymane, Sama Hemayoro, Sérémé Abdoulaye, Koita Kadidia, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 1-7, July 2025.

Boro rice cultivation practices and adaptive strategies of farmers to flash floods in Sylhet haor basin

Nurunnaher Akter, Md. Rafiqul Islam, Md. Abdul Karim, Md. Giashuddin Miah, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 7-18, June 2025.

Technology adoption and its impact on environmental and socioeconomic outcomes for vegetable producers in Svay Rieng Province, Cambodia

Hong Chhun, Chun Nimul, Buntong Borarin, Serey Mardy, Sao Vibol, Chan Bunyeth, Tum Saravuth, Ros Vanchey, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 1-6, June 2025.

Effect of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) border crop on the control of cotton bollworms

Lovemore Mutaviri, Washington Mubvekeri, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 122-127, May 2025.