Effect of planting date on ecophysiological and morphological characteristics of lines and varieties of barley in different regions of Kermanshah

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/08/2014
Views (699)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effect of planting date on ecophysiological and morphological characteristics of lines and varieties of barley in different regions of Kermanshah

Mohammad Reza Pourmotabbed, Amin Farnia, Niazi Fard. Alishir
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 5(2), 572-577, August 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Obtaining high performance from barley needs to conform vegetative and reproductive growth stages to suitable weather conditions through suitable planting date. The present research carried out to study the effect of planting date on ecophysiological and morphological traits of ten lines and varieties of barley in different regions of Kermanshah by using split plats in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications in the Research Farm of Islam Abad Gharb, Kermanshah province during cropping years 2011-2012. The treatments of planting date were consisting of 3levels October 7th, October 22th and November 6th as main factors and irrigated barley variety as sub – factors in 10 levels MBD–88–19, MBD–88, MBD–88–13, MBD–88–16, MBD–88–5, MBD–88–2 and D10 along with control genotypes of Nosrat, Yousof, and Nik. The results of analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that effects of planting date on seed performance, number of spikes per square meter, number of seed per spike, 1000-seed weight, biological performance and HI at the level of 1% probability were significant. The comparison of mean effect of planting date on economical performance showed that planting date of October 22th with 4736 kg per hectare has the most economical performance and November 6th with 4033 kg per hectare has the least performance.

Sharifi AM. 2006. Sensitivity of common wheat variety of khorasan province to early planting date and crop. Final report. Agricaltural research center and Natural resources of khorasan province.

Azimi M, khoda Rahmi M, Jalal kamali MR. 2012. Studying the seed performance and some important agricultural traits in genotypes of spring wheat in final draught stress conditions and without stress. Journal of zeraat va Eslahe nabatat 8, 175 – 193.

Tabatabaei A, Shakeri A, shahedi M. 2013. Studying the performance change, performance components and some physiological scientific and research journal of physiology of crop. Islamic Azad university – Ahwaz Branch. 5, 110 – 114.

Moeini Rad A, Pridashti HA, Mokhtar pour H. 2013. Effect of planting date and density on performance, performance components and phonology of maize single cross 704 in Gorgan. Zeraat journal (Research and constructing). 10, 56-67.

Mahmoudian M, Fallahi H. 2006. journal of knowledge. 11th Agriculture sciences and plant reformation congress. Page 3.

Calderini DF, Savin R, Abeledo LG, Reynolds MP, Slafer GA. 2001. The importance of the period immediately preceding an thesis for grain weight determination in wheat. Euphytica. 119, 199-204.

Gonzalez FG, Slafer GA, Miraleses DJ. 2003. Grain and floret number in response to photoperiod during stem elongation in fully and slightly vernalized wheats. Field Crops Res. 81, 17-27.

Habibi D, Shafiei S, Mashhadi-Bojar S, Ardakani MR, Fatollah-Taleghani D. 2006. Effect of droughtstress and selenium foliar on some character of two cultivars of soybean. Journal of Zeraat va EslahenabatateIran. 2, 51-64. (In Persian with English abstract).

Heyne EG. 1997. Wheat improvement. American Society of agronomy. Madison.Wisconsin. U.S.A. PP. 132-136.

Knapp WR, Knapp JS. 1978. Response of winter wheat to date of planting and fall fertilization. Agron. J. 10, 1048-1053.

Knapp WR., knapp JS. 1980. Interaction of planting date and fall fertilization on winter barely performance. Agronomy Journal 72, 440-445.

Peltonen-Sainio P, Muurinen S, Rajala A, Jauhianen, L. 2006. Variation in harvest index of modern spring barley, oat and wheat cultivars adapted to northern grown conditions. Manuscript (In Press).

Sinclair TR, Jamiesen PD. 2006. Grain number, wheat yield and botting beer: an analysis. Field Crop Res. 98, 60-67.

Sprague GF, Dudley JW. 1988. Corn and corn Improvement. 3rd ed. American Society of Agronomy. 986 pp.

Stapper M, Fisher RA. 1990. Genotype, sowing date and plant spacing influence on high-yielding irrigated wheat in southern New South Wales. II. Growth, yield and nitrogen use. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 41, 997-101

Sharma SK, SardanaV, Randhow AS. 2000. Effect of time of sowing and levels of N-P-K fertilizer on the grain yield and yello berry incidence in durum wheat (Triticum durum). Field Crop Abs. 53, 925-930.

Vezina L. 1992. Influence of sowing date on competitive effects of settaria pumilla and echinochloa crus-galli on barely and spring wheat. Weed research 32, 57-65.

Related Articles

Assessment of heavy metal levels in spring water of Dansolihon, Cagayan de Oro City

Faith M. Guimary*, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 12-19, February 2026.

Evaluating curriculum alignment, accuracy, and readability of ‘environmental disaster, sanitation, and waste management

Analyn I. Diola*, Priscilla R. Castro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.

Above and below ground carbon stock assessment of natural and planted mangrove forest in Davao Occidental, Philippines

C. F. Mangaga*, W. T. Tatil, H. A. R. Quiaoit, P. D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 157-167, January 2026.

Extraction and characterization of distilled water from by-product of salt refinery processing

Analyn I. Diola*, Eric A. Cunanan, Irene A. De Vera, Christian Garret F. Aquino, Julie M. Agpaoa, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 151-156, January 2026.

Vulnerability to illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing: The case of the Talusan, Zamboanga Sibugay, Philippines

Angelica M. Darunday*, Judy Ann H. Fernandez, Shekinah L. Ogoc, Norlika D. Moti, Larry C. Herbito, Armi G. Torres, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 138-150, January 2026.

Socio-ecological dimensions of intertidal gleaning: The use of local ecological knowledge to identify commercially important gastropods in Iligan Bay, Philippines

Katrina Flores, Armi G. Torres, Wella T. Tatil, Ivane R. Pedrosa-Gerasmio*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 126-137, January 2026.

Conservation assessment of the marine ornamental fish species Pomacanthus imperator (Emperor angelfish) in the Philippines

Timothy Jan L. Adel*, Armi G. Torres, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 114-125, January 2026.

Land use conflicts: An impediment to improved agrifood value chain management as perceived by crop farmers in southeast Nigeria

J. U. Chikaire, C. C. Ejiogu, H. I. Duruanyim, T. O. Ogbuji, S. I. Ogbaa, A. O. Kalu, J. I. Ukpabi, A. Rufai, L. C. Izunobi, J. U. Okwudili, C. I. Anah, E. U. Omeire, I. O. Okeoma, J. Nnametu, U. G. Chris-Ejiogu, I. E. Edom, C. N. Atoma, U. S. Awhareno, E. C. Mube-Williams, S. O. Adejoh, A. D. Ude, J. O. Oparaojiaku, C. O. Osuagwu, E. E. Ihem, B. N. Aririguzo, E. C. C. Amaechi, M. N. Osuji, C. A. Acholonu, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 102-113, January 2026.