Response of tomato metabolism to manures and fertilizers

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/03/2012
Views (739)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Response of tomato metabolism to manures and fertilizers

Irshad Ahmad
Int. J. Biosci. 2(3), 106-109, March 2012.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2012; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Tomato (Latin-juicy wolf peach) is a popular, versatile, easily grown plant with a great tasting fruit. Originally cultivated during prehistoric times by the Indians in South America, they were long believed to be poisonous. But now tomato is the favourite of home vegetable gardeners and is widely cultivated and used throughout the world. In this study, tomato plants were treated with organic manures (F.Y.M, Sewage Sludge) and inorganic fertilizers (N.P.K, Zn, S) were analysed for biochemical composition. Phenol, chlorophyll, protein, sulphur, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content exhibited an increase at all the test concentrations and were found maximum in sewage sludge treated along with N.P.K (T7).

Adrian J. 2004. Green manuring, principles and practices. Agrobios, Jodhpur, India.37-113.

Peach K, Tracy M V. 1955. Modern methods of plant analysis. 2, 645-670.

Bangal  S  D,  Shaik  G  A,  Adsule  R  N.  1989. Influence of different levels of N, P and K fertilizers on the yield and quality of tomato. J. of Mahr. Agric. Univ. 14, 158-160.

Zubanova L S, Nezhnev N, Kudyurova O N. 1975. Effect of minor elements on the yield and some biochemical characteristics of tomato plants. Sbornik-Ovoschev-Odstva-I-Backhchevodsta. 3, 115-120.

Stratigakos A, Ormrod D P. 1985. Response of tomato to sulphur nutrition and SO2. Water, Air and Soil Pollution. 24, 19-26.

Hamdy H, Sherif S M, Zein A, Motaz M B, El-Abdin A Z. 1971. Effect of sulphur on the plant contents of N.P.K Ca and Mg. Agric. Res. Review. 5, 187-197.

Sree-Mannarayana B, Mrinalini G, Raju A S, Ram A S. 1998. Effect of nitrogen and sulphur application on yield and uptake of macro and micro nutrients by sunflower. Annals of Agric.Res. 19, 188-195, 1998.

Related Articles

Comparative responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to iron toxicity, drought and salinity stress: Morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular regulation mechanisms

Yaya Touré*, Brahima André Soumahoro, Arthur Martin Affery, Tchoa Koné, Mongomaké Koné, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 37-50, June 2026.

Biocontrol potential of indigenous fungal antagonists from soils naturally suppressive to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4

Arnel V. Somolostro*, Carolina D. Amper, Mellprie B. Marin, Darwin M. Apistar, Myrna G. Ballentes, Ailyn Q. Daniel, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 27-36, June 2026.

Basal stem rot of oil palm in Africa: Emerging epidemiology, pathogen diversity and future management challenges

Emmanuel Fumbuka Mabula*, Agatha Aloyce, Alfonce Leonard, Pavithravani B. Venkataramana, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 13-26, June 2026.

The role of aberrant glycosylation in autoimmune disease development and progression

Md. Nafis Fuad Prottoy, Sayad Md. Didarul Alam*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 1-12, June 2026.

Solvents’ influence on polyphenolic compound extractions from Lippia multiflora leaves (Mold, 1949), and their antioxidant activity

Kelemin Awa Koné*, Tagouèlbè Tiho, Mariam Sanogo, Casimir Kekou, Kouassi Hervé Tani, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 109-116, May 2026.

Economics of selected cropping system practices in the province of La Union, Philippines

Jennifer A. Cabading, V. Sagun Analyn, Angelina T. Gonzales*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 97-108, May 2026.

The hidden burden: A review of toxicity from femoral orthopedic implants

Haroon Habib Beigh*, Nabeel Khan, Mirza Masroor Ali Beg, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 84-96, May 2026.