Effect of applications of superabsorbent and drought stress on electrical conductivity, number of seed, diameter of head and percent of protein in sun flower

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2014
Views (672)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effect of applications of superabsorbent and drought stress on electrical conductivity, number of seed, diameter of head and percent of protein in sun flower

Hamed Keykha, Elahe Rahdar, Mohammad Mahdi Raoofi, Amir Zarabi
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 5(6), 184-189, December 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Sunflower is the most important oil crop in Serbia as well as in some other parts of the world. Sunflower is most sensitive to water deficit stress in its flowering and seed-maturity stages. On the other hand, flower initiation and seed setting stages were reported as the sensitive stages of sunflower life cycle to water deficit. One such mechanism that is ubiquitous in plants is the accumulation of certain organic metabolites of low molecular weight that are collectively known as compatible solutes. The application of super absorbent polymer has a significant impact in reducing drought stress effects and to improve plants yield and stability in agriculture production. The field experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with split plot design with three replications. Treatments included irrigation as a main plot in four levels included (Full irrigation, water stress in fourth and fifth even leaf, water stress in flowering stage, water stress in fourth and fifth even leaf + water stress in flowering stage ) and concentrations of Superabsorbent in three levels included (0, 15 and 30 kg/ha) as sub plot. Analysis of variance showed that the effect of water stress on electrical conductivity, number of seed and diameter of head was significant.

Abdollahian M, Froud R. 1998. Effect of moisture stress  and  rewatering  on  growth  and  dry  matter partitioning in three cultivars of sugar beet. Aspect Application Biology. 52, 71-78.

Albuquerque FM, Carvalho NM. 2003. Effect of type  of  environmental  stress on  the emergence  of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), soyabean (Glycine max (L.) Merril) and maize (Zea mays L.) seeds with different levels of vigor. Seed Sci Technol. 31, 465-467.

Andres R, Lazaro A, Chueca R, Hermoso L, Gorge L. 1990. Effect of alcohols on the association of photosynthetic fructose- 1, 6- bisphosphatase to thylakoid membranes. Physiology Plant. 78, 409-413.

Ashraf M, Mehmood S. 1990. Response of four Brassica species to drought stress. Environ. Expt. Bot. 30, 93-100.

Baldini M, Givanardi R, Vanozzi GP, 2000. Effect of different water availability on fatty acid compos ition of the oil in standard and high oleic sunflower hyrids. 75, 235-246.

Bohnert HJ, Nelson DE. 1995. Adaptation to environmental stresses. Plant Cell. 71, 99-111.

Bosnjak Dj, Marinkovic R. 1992. Sunflower requirement for water in the chernozem zone of Yugoslavia. Physiology Plant. 1, 57-63.

Clover G, Smith H, jaggard K. 1998. The crop under stress. British Sugar Beet Review. 66, 17-19.

Demmers-Derks H, Mitchel RAC, Mitchell VJ, Driscoll SP, Gibbard C, Lawlor DW. 1996. Sugar beet under climatic change: photosynthesis and production. Aspect Application Biology. 45, 163-170.

Firoozabadi M, Abdollahian-Noghabi M, Rahimzadeh F, Moghadam M, Parsaeyan M. 2003. Effects of different levels of continuous water stress on the yield quality of three sugar beet lines. Sugar beet journal of Iran. 19, 133-142.

Gout E, Aubert S, Blingy R, Rebeille F, Nonomura AR. 2000. Metabolism of methanol in plant cells. Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance studies. Plant Physiology. 123, 287-296.

Hsiao TC. 2000. Leaf and root growth in relation to water status. Horticulture science. 35, 1051-1058.

Jana PK, Misra B, Kar PK.1982. Effect of irrigation at different physiological stages of growth on yield attributes, yield, consumptive use and water use efficiency of sunflower. Plant Physiology. 26, 39-42.

Khadem SA, Galavi M, Ramrodi M, Mousavi SR, Rousta MJ, Rezvani-moghadam P. 2010. Effect of animal manure and super absorbent polymer on corn leaf relative water content, cell membrane stability and leaf chlorophyll content under dry condition. Aust Journal of Crop Sciences. 4, 642-647.

Knowles PF. 1988. Recent advances in oil crops breeding. Applewhite TH. Proceeding of the World Conference on Biotechnology for the Fats and Oil Industry. Ed. American Oil Chemists Society. 12,135- 138.

Kouhestani SH, Askari N, Maghsoudi K. 2009. The effect of super-absorbent hydro gel on the performance of corn (Zea mays L.) under drought stress conditions. Journal of Iranian Water Resources. 3, 45-56

Sakamoto A, Murata N. 2002. The role of glycinebetaine in the protection of plants from stress: clues from transgenic plants. Plant Cell Environ. 25, 163-171

Skoric D. 1992. Achievements and future directions of sunflower breeding. Field Crops Research. 30, 231-270.

Stone    IR, Schlegel AJ, Gwin RE, Khan AH, 1996. Response of corn, grain sorghum and sunflower to irrigation in the High Plains of Kansas. Agric Water Manag. 30, 251-259.

Tremolieres A, Dubacq JP, Drapier D. 1982. Unsaturated fatty acids in maturing seeds of sunflower and rape: regulation by temperature and light intensity. Aust Journal of Crop Sciences 21, 41 – 45.

Unger PW. 1986. Growth and development of irrigated sunflower in the Texas High Plains. Agron Journal. 78, 507-515.

Woodhouse J, Johnson MS. 1991. Effect of super absorbent polymers on survival and growth of crop seedlings. Agric Water Manage. 20, 63–70.

Related Articles

Value chain analysis and business model development of the Rizal mango growers agriculture cooperative

Macluven T. Gonzales, Diana O. Lim*, Karen Joy A. Abalos, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 186-198, July 2026.

Susceptibility of Culex quinquefasciatus to insecticides in the industrial areas of Koumassi, Vridi, and Yopougon in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, during the rainy season

Gahapie Urbain Silue*, Koffi Ladji Yao, N’tamon Romeo N’tamon, Edmond Charles Basseli, Genevieve Lydie Acapovi-Yao, Yao Lucien Konan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 175-185, July 2026.

Optimization of maltodextrin as a bulking agent in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit bar: Physical, sensory, and nutritional evaluation

Macluven T. Gonzales*, Diana O. Lim, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 150-163, July 2026.

An assessment of the effect of wind flow on the indoor thermal condition of some buildings in Benin City, Nigeria

Tashok, Yusuf Haruna*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 136-149, July 2026.

Analyzing roadside tree diversity reveals dominance, shadow diversity, and management archetypes: The case of Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines

Johnuel Tac-on, Jesie Diola, Noel T. Lomosbog, Jairyl B. Oclarit, MA. Aneli A. Lanzaderas*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 122-135, July 2026.

Floristic diversity of major river systems in Zamboanga del Norte

Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, Maria Rio A. Naguit, Ethel T. Cata-al, Tessie G. Pulido, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 101-111, July 2026.