Beliefs, knowledge and lived experiences of the higher education institute educators in mitigating climate change

Paper Details

Research Paper 18/02/2024
Views (1019)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Beliefs, knowledge and lived experiences of the higher education institute educators in mitigating climate change

Quirino G. Pascua
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 24(2), 123-134, February 2024.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2024; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the beliefs, knowledge, and lived experiences among educators of Cagayan State University in mitigating climate change. A reliable researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect data from 275 randomly selected educators in the eight (8) campuses of Cagayan State University. Results revealed that educators describe their actions in mitigating climate change as “Often” to both social (3.77) and economic (3.84) aspects, while it is deemed “Always” for their actions relevant to the environmental (4.37) aspects. It is observed that the perceived described actions of the educators based on their knowledge and lived experiences about climate change are complementing one another. That is why both social and economic aspects are answered majority as “Often”. On the other hand, the described actions of the educators to mitigate climate change on environmental aspects had surfaced to be “Always”. Thus, the previous results revealed that the educators know something about climate change, they feel worried about it and they believe climate change is happening are precursors to developing high sense of concern to the protection of our environment and ultimately developing an environment-friendly behavior among the educators of the Cagayan State University.

Ahmed KJ,  Chowdhury MTA, Ahmed MNQ,  Haq, SMA. 2021. Understanding Climate Change Perception of Teachers and Students: An Overview. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77259-8_20

Aydin F. 2010. Secondary school students’ perceptions towards global warming: A Phenomenographic analysis. Academic Journals 5 (12), 1566-1570.

Erten S,  Karaismailoglu ES. 2018. Investigation on Environmental Awareness Level of Teachers. Research Gate 9(96), 103.

Jakobsson A, Mäkitalo A, Säljö R. 2009. Conceptions of knowledge in research on students’ understanding of the greenhouse effect: Methodological positions and their consequences for representations of knowing. Science Education 93(6), 978-995.https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20341

Burgess J, Harrison CM, Filius P. 1998. Environmental Communication and the Cultural Politics of Environmental Citizenship. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 30(8), 1445-1460. https://doi.org/10.1068/a301445

Lehnert M, Fiedor D,, Frajer J, Hercik J, Jurek M. 2020. Czech students and mitigation of global warming: beliefs and willingness to take action, Environmental Education Research 26(6), 864-889, DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2019.1694140

Skamp K, Boyes E, Stanisstreet M. 2013. Beliefs and Willingness to Act About Global Warming: Where to Focus Science Pedagogy?

Capstick SB, Pigeon NF. 2014. What is climate change scepticism? Examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the UK public. Global Environmental Change 24, 389-401.

Weintrobe S. 2013. Engaging with Climate Change: Psychoanalytic and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Beyond the Couch Series’: The New Library of Psycho-Analysis.

Fagan M, Huang C. 2018. A Look at How People around the world view Climate Change. Pew Research Center, Spring 2018 Global Attitude Survey Q22d.

Rosen RA Guenther E. 2015. The economics of mitigating climate change: What can we know, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 91, 93-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.013.

Related Articles

Floristic composition and woody species diversity in Campo-Ma’an National Park, South Cameroon

Achey Nkenfack Djike Baudelair*, Temgoua Lucie Félicité, Kuete Fogang Marcien, Nfondem Poumie Mohamed Mounir, Atoupka Abdel Malik, Djeuni Duplex Romuald, Kontchiachou Nkana Didier, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 103-119, June 2026.

Comparative effects of bio-inoculant on nutrient dynamics of biodegradable waste

Anjelle-J G. Debosura*, Carlo Stephen O. Moneva, Corazon V. Ligaray, Elizabeth Edan M. Albiento, MA. Cecilia V. Almeda, Melgie A. Alas, Frandel Louis S. Dagoc, Peter D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 97-102, June 2026.

Impact of deforestation on the aquatic macroinvertebrate community and the ecological quality of Mé River (South-East, Côte d’Ivoire)

Gnago Dohou Affri*, Tapé Logboh David, Edia Oi Edia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 80-96, June 2026.

Vulnerability and regeneration potential of Bambusa vulgaris in Ebolowa, South Cameroon

Rodine Tchiofo Lontsi*, Duchesse Elvira Kepmou, Emilienne Laure Ngahane, Jacques Christophe Awoa Essam, Isaac Blaise Djoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 68-79, June 2026.

Temporal availability of floral resources for the honey bee (Apis mellifera) in a forest ecosystem in the sudanian zone of Côte d’Ivoire: The case of Badenou classified forest

Dofoungo Koné*, Comlan Mawussi Koudegnan, Siendou Coulibaly, Fofana Séguéna, Bruno Marcel Iritié, Wandan Eboua Narcisse, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 56-67, June 2026.

Carbon sequestration potential of napier (Pennisetum purpureum) grass applied with varying classifications of livestock excrement

Alliah B. Balaba*, Niña Mae R. Villar, Ana Celina T. Soriano, Myrna G. Pabiona, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 50-55, June 2026.

Effects of environmental stressors on morphological traits of Glycine max (L.) Merr. and microbial diversity of soil treated with cadmium and lead

Fortune Onyeuka Otumunye*, Tobore Roseline Agbosa, Boniface Edegbai, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 42-49, June 2026.

SWAT+-based water balance assessment of Ipil watershed in Bohol, Philippines: Spatial and temporal patterns of water availability

Anselmo M. Aurestila*, Proceso M. Castil, Manolito C. Macalolot, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 30-41, June 2026.