Evaluating safety and health practices in construction sector for implementation

Paper Details

Research Paper 09/12/2024
Views (1060)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Evaluating safety and health practices in construction sector for implementation

Cliven June B. Calunsag
Int. J. Biosci. 25(6), 354-364, December 2024.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2024; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate contractors’ health and safety with regard to their personnel, workspace, and tools. Additionally, it sought to assess adherence to occupational health and safety regulations concerning heavy machinery operations, civil works projects, a health and safety plan, and occupational safety and health training. In order to objectively assess the variable or variables of interest, it combines quantitative research with a self-created questionnaire that forecasts and explains concepts that may be applied to other individuals and places. The questionnaire is chosen, produced, and standardized with validity and reliability in mind. The results showed that respondents only partially followed workplace, work equipment, and people safety and health regulations related to construction. The requirements for occupational health and safety were partially satisfied in the areas of heavy machinery operations, civil works projects, health and safety plans, and occupational safety and health training. Additionally, a portion of the construction safety and health level of compliance was fulfilled. Therefore, it is recommended that construction firms use the updated construction safety model.

British Standards Institution. 2007. OHSAS 18001: Occupational health and safety management systems-Specification. British Standards Institution, London.

Carvajal GI. 2008. Modelo de cuantificación de riesgos laborales en la construcción: RTESCo. (Doctoral Thesis). Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, España.

Enshassi A, Mohamed S, Abushaban S. 2009. Factors affecting the performance of construction projects in the Gaza strip. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 15(3), 269–280. DOI: 10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.269-280.

Geller S. 1994. Ten principles for achieving a total safety culture. Professional Safety 39, 18–24.

Hata B, Szostak M. 2014. Analysis of the development of accident situations in the construction industry. Procedia Engineering 91, 429–434.

International Organization for Standardization. 2008. ISO 9001: Quality management systems-Requirements. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.

Meliá JL, Mearns K, Silva SA, Lima ML. 2008. Safety climate responses and the perceived risk of accidents in the construction industry. Safety Science 46(6), 949–958.

Molenaar K, Brown H, Caile S, Smith R. 2002. Corporate culture: A study of firms with outstanding construction safety. Professional Safety 47(7), 18–27. Retrieved from https://aeasseincludes.assp.org/professionalsafety/pastissues/047/07/018229xe.pdf.

Nyirenda V, Chinniah Y, Agard B. 2015. Identifying key factors for an occupational health and safety risk estimation tool in small and medium-size enterprises. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48, 541–546.

Sousa V, Almeida N, Dias L. 2014. Risk-based management of occupational safety and health. Safety Science 66, 75–86.

Suárez Sánchez FA, Carvajal Peláez GI, Catalá Alís J. 2017. Occupational safety and health in construction: A review of applications and trends. Industrial Health 55(3), 210–218. DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.2016-0108. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5462637/.

Turner JR. 2009. The handbook of project-based management. 3rd ed. McGraw Hill, London, England, pp. 209–231.

Zhou Z, Goh YM, Li Q. 2015. Overview and analysis of safety management studies in construction. Safety Science 72, 337–350.

Related Articles

Intra-population genetic diversity modeling of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) population in Niger

Adamou Ibrahim Maman Laouali*, Zango Oumarou, Alio Moussa Abdourazak, Rafiou Abdoulaye, Idi Saidou Sani, Idi Garba Nana Mariama, Bakasso Yacoubou, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 62-70, September 2026.

Biocontrol potential of indigenous Trichoderma isolates against Fusarium wilt of cotton in Tanzania: In vitro screening and screen-house validation

Fauzia Khalid Mpiganzila*, Alfonce Leonard, Lidia Munuo, Ernest Mbega, Agatha Aloyce, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 44-61, September 2026.

In vitro study of antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antihyperglycemic activity of medicinal plants

T. K. Nishath*, P. Mathavi, V. Ambikapathy, P. Prakash, A. Panneerselvam, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 32-43, September 2026.

Association between the IL13 rs1800925 (-1112C/T) polymorphism and Schistosoma mansoni infection intensity in a population from western Côte d’Ivoire

Bernardin Ahouty Ahouty*, Abla Edwige Sokouri, Georges Bohoussou Kassi, Innocent Allépo Abé, Martial Kassi N’djetchi, Yaya Ouangbo Ouattara, Ornella Karmelle Lydia Dago, Mathurin Yao Koffi, Thomas Konan Konan, Mathurin N’Goran Koffi, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 20-31, September 2026.

Abattoir-based surveillance reveals geographic clustering and risk factors for bovine tuberculosis in Tanzania

Yohana Siyajali Anatory*, Beatus Lyimo, Blandina T. Mmbaga, Joram Buza, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 11-19, September 2026.

In vitro assessment of the anticancer activity of quinaldic acid against human breast cancer cells (MCF-7)

N. Medhavi, S. M. Sivasankaran, K. Selvakumar, K. Harish, S. Manoharan*, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 1-10, September 2026.

In silico molecular docking analysis of quinaldic acid against cancer related targets

N. Medhavi, K. Harish, S. M. Sivasankaran, K. Selvakumar, B. Vidhyambigai, S. Manoharan*, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 129-139, August 2026.

First records of Macrogyrodactylus clarii and six species of Quadriacanthus (Monogenea) infecting Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) across four localities in Senegal

Arfang Diamanka*, Abdou Toure, Sikhou Drame, Cheikh Diop, Ngor Faye, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 118-128, August 2026.