Innovated iPlan in computer-aided design (cad) for engineering and technology at the state university
Paper Details
Innovated iPlan in computer-aided design (cad) for engineering and technology at the state university
Abstract
This iPlan evaluated the efficacy of the recently established plan for engineering drawing. The lesson plan for effective instruction that was discussed above was impacted by Merill’s four stages, which are activation, demonstration, application, and integration. The first quarter of the academic year 2018-2019 saw the participation of thirty college students from Jose Rizal Memorial State University in the survey. The purpose of the survey was to evaluate the efficiency of putting into practice the recently developed instructional plan (iPlan). The investigation of the aforementioned subject utilized the target data, a customized questionnaire that underwent both pilot testing and expert validation. Also, the dependability coefficient of 0.60 was calculated using 20 (KR20) on the previous equipment. We compared the experimental and controlled groups for both practical and theoretical performance, taking the mean of each version for each competency. We conducted this comparison with the experimental group. The data collection, analysis, and interpretation revealed that the innovated iPlan in Computer-Aided Design (CAD) significantly enhances student achievement. The completion of the aforementioned processes revealed this. Furthermore, it was evident that students were cooperative and involved throughout the entirety of the training stages, which demonstrated that they were having a positive time. We must recommend the cutting-edge iPlan to students at Jose Rizal Memorial State University because engineering drawing is suitable for each of Merill’s four phases of education.
Halim L, Yasin R, Ishar A. 2012. CAMED: An innovative communication tool in teaching engineering drawing. Retrieved from www.ukm.my/fpendidikan.
Harmon K. 2012. Planning for effective instruction: Best practices (Part 1). Retrieved from www.marzanocenter.com.
Merrill MD. 2009. First principles of instruction. In: Reigeluth CM, Carr-Chellman AA (Eds.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: Building a Common Knowledge Base, Vol. III. Routledge, New York, 41–56.
Ponce MT. 2005. Computer-aided design (CAD) of Cebu State College of Science and Technology system: Instructional enhancement package.
Reigeluth CM. 2011. An instructional theory for the post-industrial age. Educ Technol 51(5), 25–29.
Reigeluth CM. 2012. Instructional theory and technology for a post-industrial world. In: Reiser RA, Dempsey JV (Eds.), Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, 3rd ed. Pearson Education, Boston, 75–83.
Romiszowski A. 2009. Fostering skill development outcomes. In: Reigeluth CM, Carr-Chellman AA (Eds.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: Building a Common Knowledge Base, Vol. III. Routledge, New York, 199–224.
Wyte-Lake T, Tran K, Bowman C, Needleman J, Dobalian A. 2013. A systematic review of strategies to address the clinical nursing faculty shortage. J Nurs Educ 52(5). https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20130213-02.
Christian Jude Bolasco Calunsag (2025), Innovated iPlan in computer-aided design (cad) for engineering and technology at the state university; IJB, V26, N2, February, P85-91
https://innspub.net/innovated-iplan-in-computer-aided-design-cad-for-engineering-and-technology-at-the-state-university/
Copyright © 2025
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0