Cost and return analysis in using beneficial microbes in organic fertilizer versus chemical fertilizer in eggplant production: A research note

Paper Details

Research Paper 10/03/2025
Views (573)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Cost and return analysis in using beneficial microbes in organic fertilizer versus chemical fertilizer in eggplant production: A research note

Jomar L. Aban
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 26(3), 120-125, March 2025.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2025; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

This research note examines the cost and benefit evaluation of utilizing beneficial microbes in organic fertilizers versus traditional chemical fertilizers in the production of eggplant (Solanum melongena). With agriculture progressively looking for sustainable options to synthetic inputs, the use of organic fertilizers enriched with microbial inoculants offers a practical solution. The research highlights the importance of beneficial microbes in boosting soil quality, increasing nutrient absorption, and supporting plant development, which may lead to higher economic profits. This project utilized experimental design—from no fertilizer to conventional and organic fertilizer inputs with beneficial microbes—were utilized to assess crop performance. Initial results suggest that eggplants amended with organic fertilizer with beneficial microbes along with wastewater showed the greatest return on investment, highlighting the success of microbial use in enhancing agricultural output. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the existing issue of local communities not fully utilizing organic waste, which makes up a substantial part of municipal waste. Raising understanding of the advantages of utilizing organic fertilizers and microbial bioactivators is vital for transforming waste into a resource. As consumer demand for organic products increases, the results indicate that farmers adopting these sustainable methods can gain financially and aid in maintaining ecological balance. This study highlights the real-world effects of utilizing beneficial microbes in farming, establishing a basis for future research aimed at improving sustainability and profitability in agricultural crop yields.

Agricultural Training Institute, Department of Agriculture (ATI-DA). n.d. Package of technology (POT) for eggplant production (Eggplant production guide). https://ati.da.gov.ph/rtc10/sites/default/files/EGGPLANT%20PRODUCTION%20GUIDE.pdf

Calculator.net. n.d. Return on investment calculator. https://www.calculator.net/roi-calculator.html (Accessed February 28, 2025).

Canfora L, Pugliese M, Furmanczyk EM. 2024. Editorial: The impact of environmentally friendly agricultural practices on soil microbiome. Frontiers in Microbiology 15, 1505220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1505220

Chaudhary A, Chaudhary P, Abou Fayssal S, Singh S, Jaiswal DK, Tripathi V, Kumar J. 2024. Exploring beneficial microbes and their multifaceted applications: An overview, pp. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0633-4_1

ELR Family Trading Co., Inc. (ELRTCI). 2018. The Organiculture Innovator Company. Beneficial microorganism “Super Decomposer” – ELR Family Trading Co., Inc. http://elrfamilytrading.com/2018/12/14/beneficial-microorganism-super-decomposer/

González J, Torres R, Fernandez P. 2022. Consumer preferences and market trends in organic farming. Agricultural Economics Review 35(2), 201–217.

He S, Zhang Y, Yang X, Li Q, Li CT, Yao T. 2024. Effects of microbial inoculants combined with chemical fertilizer on growth and soil nutrient dynamics of Timothy (Phleum pratense L.). Agronomy 14(5), 1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14051016

Huang X, Li Y, Zhao Q. 2020. Impact of organic and chemical fertilizers on soil properties and crop yield. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 12(3), 89–102.

Jat RS, Datta A, Sharma P. 2021. Role of microbial inoculants in sustainable agriculture. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 155, 108–119.

Mishra S, Patel J, Kumar R. 2020. Long-term effects of chemical fertilizers on soil degradation and crop productivity. International Journal of Agronomy 45(1), 56–72.

Qadir M, Hussain A, Iqbal A, Shah F, Wu W, Cai H. 2024. Microbial utilization to nurture robust agroecosystems for food security. Agronomy 14(9), 1891. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14091891

Smith B, Thompson L, Richards J. 2019. Soil health and productivity: Comparing organic and chemical inputs. Sustainable Agriculture Journal 8(1), 34–50.

Related Articles

Assessing public awareness and knowledge of drinking water safety in Carmen, Cagayan De Oro City, Philippines

Ronnie L. Besagas, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 80-85, October 2025.

Baseline floristics and above-ground biomass in permanent sample plots across miombo woodlands in different land tenure systems in Hwedza, Zimbabwe

Edwin Nyamugadza, Sara Feresu, Billy Mukamuri, Casey Ryan, Clemence Zimudzi, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 65-79, October 2025.

Adapting to shocks and stressors: Aqua-marine processors approach

Kathlyn A. Mata, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 57-64, October 2025.

Design and development of a sustainable chocolate de-bubbling machine to reduce food waste and support biodiversity-friendly cacao processing

John Adrian B. Bangoy, Michelle P. Soriano, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 41-47, October 2025.

Ecological restoration outcomes in Rwanda’s Rugezi wetland: Biodiversity indices and food web recovery

Concorde Kubwimana, Jean Claude Shimirwa, Pancras Ndokoye, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 32-40, October 2025.

Noise pollution in the urban environment and its impact on human health: A review

Israa Radhi Khudhair, Bushra Hameed Rasheed, Rana Ihssan Hamad, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 28-31, October 2025.

Prevalence of Anaplasma marginale and Ehrlichia ruminantium in wild grasscutter’ specific ticks in southern Côte d’Ivoire

Zahouli Faustin Zouh Bi, Alassane Toure, Yatanan Casimir Ble, Yahaya Karamoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 21-27, October 2025.