Cost and return analysis in using beneficial microbes in organic fertilizer versus chemical fertilizer in eggplant production: A research note

Paper Details

Research Paper 10/03/2025
Views (901)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Cost and return analysis in using beneficial microbes in organic fertilizer versus chemical fertilizer in eggplant production: A research note

Jomar L. Aban
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 26(3), 120-125, March 2025.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2025; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

This research note examines the cost and benefit evaluation of utilizing beneficial microbes in organic fertilizers versus traditional chemical fertilizers in the production of eggplant (Solanum melongena). With agriculture progressively looking for sustainable options to synthetic inputs, the use of organic fertilizers enriched with microbial inoculants offers a practical solution. The research highlights the importance of beneficial microbes in boosting soil quality, increasing nutrient absorption, and supporting plant development, which may lead to higher economic profits. This project utilized experimental design—from no fertilizer to conventional and organic fertilizer inputs with beneficial microbes—were utilized to assess crop performance. Initial results suggest that eggplants amended with organic fertilizer with beneficial microbes along with wastewater showed the greatest return on investment, highlighting the success of microbial use in enhancing agricultural output. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the existing issue of local communities not fully utilizing organic waste, which makes up a substantial part of municipal waste. Raising understanding of the advantages of utilizing organic fertilizers and microbial bioactivators is vital for transforming waste into a resource. As consumer demand for organic products increases, the results indicate that farmers adopting these sustainable methods can gain financially and aid in maintaining ecological balance. This study highlights the real-world effects of utilizing beneficial microbes in farming, establishing a basis for future research aimed at improving sustainability and profitability in agricultural crop yields.

Agricultural Training Institute, Department of Agriculture (ATI-DA). n.d. Package of technology (POT) for eggplant production (Eggplant production guide). https://ati.da.gov.ph/rtc10/sites/default/files/EGGPLANT%20PRODUCTION%20GUIDE.pdf

Calculator.net. n.d. Return on investment calculator. https://www.calculator.net/roi-calculator.html (Accessed February 28, 2025).

Canfora L, Pugliese M, Furmanczyk EM. 2024. Editorial: The impact of environmentally friendly agricultural practices on soil microbiome. Frontiers in Microbiology 15, 1505220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1505220

Chaudhary A, Chaudhary P, Abou Fayssal S, Singh S, Jaiswal DK, Tripathi V, Kumar J. 2024. Exploring beneficial microbes and their multifaceted applications: An overview, pp. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0633-4_1

ELR Family Trading Co., Inc. (ELRTCI). 2018. The Organiculture Innovator Company. Beneficial microorganism “Super Decomposer” – ELR Family Trading Co., Inc. http://elrfamilytrading.com/2018/12/14/beneficial-microorganism-super-decomposer/

González J, Torres R, Fernandez P. 2022. Consumer preferences and market trends in organic farming. Agricultural Economics Review 35(2), 201–217.

He S, Zhang Y, Yang X, Li Q, Li CT, Yao T. 2024. Effects of microbial inoculants combined with chemical fertilizer on growth and soil nutrient dynamics of Timothy (Phleum pratense L.). Agronomy 14(5), 1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14051016

Huang X, Li Y, Zhao Q. 2020. Impact of organic and chemical fertilizers on soil properties and crop yield. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 12(3), 89–102.

Jat RS, Datta A, Sharma P. 2021. Role of microbial inoculants in sustainable agriculture. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 155, 108–119.

Mishra S, Patel J, Kumar R. 2020. Long-term effects of chemical fertilizers on soil degradation and crop productivity. International Journal of Agronomy 45(1), 56–72.

Qadir M, Hussain A, Iqbal A, Shah F, Wu W, Cai H. 2024. Microbial utilization to nurture robust agroecosystems for food security. Agronomy 14(9), 1891. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14091891

Smith B, Thompson L, Richards J. 2019. Soil health and productivity: Comparing organic and chemical inputs. Sustainable Agriculture Journal 8(1), 34–50.

Related Articles

Value chain analysis and business model development of the Rizal mango growers agriculture cooperative

Macluven T. Gonzales, Diana O. Lim*, Karen Joy A. Abalos, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 186-198, July 2026.

Susceptibility of Culex quinquefasciatus to insecticides in the industrial areas of Koumassi, Vridi, and Yopougon in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, during the rainy season

Gahapie Urbain Silue*, Koffi Ladji Yao, N’tamon Romeo N’tamon, Edmond Charles Basseli, Genevieve Lydie Acapovi-Yao, Yao Lucien Konan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 175-185, July 2026.

Optimization of maltodextrin as a bulking agent in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit bar: Physical, sensory, and nutritional evaluation

Macluven T. Gonzales*, Diana O. Lim, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 150-163, July 2026.

An assessment of the effect of wind flow on the indoor thermal condition of some buildings in Benin City, Nigeria

Tashok, Yusuf Haruna*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 136-149, July 2026.

Analyzing roadside tree diversity reveals dominance, shadow diversity, and management archetypes: The case of Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines

Johnuel Tac-on, Jesie Diola, Noel T. Lomosbog, Jairyl B. Oclarit, MA. Aneli A. Lanzaderas*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 122-135, July 2026.

Floristic diversity of major river systems in Zamboanga del Norte

Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, Maria Rio A. Naguit, Ethel T. Cata-al, Tessie G. Pulido, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 101-111, July 2026.