home icon user icon
Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNS Pub.
Home My Account
Submit Manuscript
double_slash
breadcumb_bg

Assessment of the status and performance of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands for industrial wastewater treatment in Tanzania

Paper Details

Research Paper 03/05/2025
Views (56) Download (3)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Assessment of the status and performance of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands for industrial wastewater treatment in Tanzania

Anita M. Rugaika
J. Bio. Env. Sci.26( 5), 1-9, May 2025.
Certificate: JBES 2025 [Generate Certificate]
Key: Constructed wetlandDarcy’s lawDesign flow rateIndustrial wastewaterTechnological performance

Abstract

Three horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands (HSSF-CWs) evaluated in northern Tanzania were from the meat, winery, and paper industries. The winery and paper industry CWs exhibited surface flow, while the meat industry CW did not. This difference was attributed to inadequate pretreatment, hydraulic, and organic overloads. Poor design also contributed to the issue, as the design flow rates exceeded those suggested by Darcy’s law, resulting in system clogging. The clogged HSSF-CWs produced poor effluent due to insufficient contact time and area between the wastewater, microorganisms, and rhizosphere. The winery industry effluent met Tanzania and WHO standards for BOD (29±1.41 mgO2/L), P (3.68±0.81 mgP/L), and FC (3.2±0.1 log unit) but did not comply with COD (137.5±116.67 mgO2/L), NO3-N (44.75±32.17 mgN/L), and NH3-N (41.05±2.9 mgN/L). The paper industry effluent met standards for NH3-N (0.12±0.17 mgN/L), P (0.22±0.26 mgP/L), and FC (3.4±0.1 log unit) but did not meet the standards for BOD (59.69±0.44 mgO2/L), COD (72.5±31.82 mgO2/L), and NO3-N (96.5±12.02 mgN/L). The meat industry effluent met standards for NO3-N (18.6±10.75 mgN/L) and FC (3.6±0.3 log unit) but failed to meet standards for BOD (59.5±14.85 mgO2/L), COD (160.5±89.8 mgO2/L), P (29.49±3.79 mgP/L), and NH3-N (57.6±23.19 mgN/L). Therefore, proper design of HSSF-CWs requires adherence to Darcy’s law and ensuring adequate information on production. Moreover, for a properly designed HSSF-CW to remain functional and have a long lifespan, regular monitoring, including water quality analysis, is essential.

Cover PDF

Ahmed S, Popov V, Trevedi RC. 2008. Constructed Wetland as Tertiary Treatment for Municipal Wastewater. Institution of Civil Engineers, p. 77-84. WR2.

Alobaidy AHMJ, Al-Sameraiy MA, Kadhem AJ, Majeed AA. 2010. Evaluation of treated municipal wastewater quality for irrigation. Journal of Environmental Protection 1(3), 216-225.

APHA 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th edition. Washington, DC, USA.

Ávila C, Salas JJ, Martín I, Aragón C, García J. 2013. Integrated treatment of combined sewer wastewater and stormwater in a hybrid constructed wetland system in southern Spain and its further reuse. Ecological Engineering 50, 13-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.08.009.

Bavor HJ, Schulz TJ. 1993. Sustainable suspended solids and nutrient removal in large-scale, solid-matrix, constructed wetland systems. In: Moshiri, G.A. (Ed.), Constructed Wetlands for Water Quality Improvement. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, p. 646–656.

Conley LM, Dick RI, Lion LW. 1991. An assessment of the root zone method of wastewater treatment. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 63 (3), 239–247.

Cooper P. 2009. What can we learn from old wetlands? Lessons that have been learned and some that may have been forgotten over the past 20 years. Desalination 246, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.03.040.

Ergaieg K, Msaddek M, Kallel A, Trabelsi I. 2021. Monitoring of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands for tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 14, 2045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08419-y.

Garcia J, Rousseau DPL, Marato, J, Lesage E, Matamotos V, Bayona JM. 2010. Contaminant removal processes in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 40, 561–661. DOI: 10.1080/10643380802471076.

Gikas P, Ranieri E, Tchobanoglous G. 2013. Removal of iron, chromium and lead from waste water by horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 88 (10), 1906-1912. DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4048.

Griffin P, Pamplin C. 1998. The advantages of a constructed reed bed-based strategy for small sewage treatment works. Water Science and Technology 38 (3), 143-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00458-2.

Kantawanichkul S, Somprasert S, Aekasin U, Shutes RBE. 2003. Treatment of agricultural wastewater in two experimental combined constructed wetland systems in a tropical climate. Water Science and Technology 48 (5), 199-205.

Karungamye P, Rugaika A, Mtei K, Machunda R. 2022. A Review of Methods for Removal of Ceftriaxone from Wastewater. Journal of Xenobiotics 12, 223–235. http://doi.org/10.3390/jox12030017.

Karungamye P, Rugaika A, Mtei K, Machunda R. 2023. Physicochemical and microbiological characterization and of hospital wastewater in Tanzania. Total Environment Research Themes 8, 100075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.totert.2023.100075.

Kataki S, Chatterjee S, Vairale M, Dwivedi S, Gupta D. 2021. Constructed wetland, an eco-technology for wastewater treatment: A review on types of wastewater treated and components of the technology (Macrophyte, biolfilm and substrate). Journal of Environmental Management 283, 111986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111986.

Kipasika HJ, Buza J, Lyimo B, Miller WA, Njau KN. 2014. Efficiency of a constructed wetland in removing microbial contaminants from pre-treated municipal wastewater. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 72-75, 68–72.

Knowles P, Dotro G, Nivala J, García J. 2011. Clogging in subsurface-flow treatment wetlands: occurrence and contributing factors. Ecological Engineering 37, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.08.00.

Mahenge A, Malabeja M. 2018. Performance analysis of anaerobic baffled Reactor and constructed wetland for Community based wastewater in dar es salam, Tanzania. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science 5, 7. https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.5.7.30.

Michael S, Paschal C, Kivevele T, Rwiza M, Njau K. 2020. Performance investigation of the slaughterhouse wastewater treatment facility: a case of Mwanza City Slaughterhouse, Tanzania. Water Practice & Technology. DOI: 10.2166/wpt.2020.085.

Mthembu MS, Odinga CA, Swalaha FM, Bux F. 2013. Constructed wetlands: A future alternative wastewater treatment technology. African Journal of Biotechnology 12(29), 4542–4553.

Njau KN, Mwegoha WJS, Kimwaga RJ, Katima JHY. 2011. Use of engineered wetlands for onsite treatment of wastewater by the local communities: Experiences from Tanzania. Water Practice and Technology 6 (3). DOI: 10.2166/wpt.2011.047.

Richard J, Kimwaga JR, Mwegoha WJS, Mahenge A, Nyomora AM, Lugali LG. 2013. Factors for Success and Failures of Constructed Wetland in the Sanitation Service Chains. Vlir research project.

Rugaika AM, Kajunguri D, Van Deun R, Van der Bruggen B, Njau K. 2018. Mass transfer approach and the designing of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland systems treating waste stabilization pond effluents. Water Science and Technology 78 (12). DOI: 10.2166/wst.2019.031.

USEPA 1993. Subsurface flow constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: A technology assessment. EPA 832/R-93/008. Washington, DC: USEPA Office of Water.

Vasconcellos G, von Sperling M, Ocampos R. 2019. From start-up to heavy clogging: Performance evaluation of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands during ten years of operation. Water Science and Technology 79, 1231–1240. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2019.062.

von Sperling M. 2007. Wastewater Characteristics, Treatment, and Disposal. London: IWA Publishing.

Vymazal J. 2005. Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment. Ecological Engineering 25, 478- 490.

Wallace SD, Knight RL. 2006. Small-scale constructed wetland treatment systems: feasibility, design criteria, and O & M requirements. Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF), Alexandria, Virginia.

Zacharia A, Ahmada W, Outwater AH, Ngasala B, Van Deun R. 2022. Using constructed wetlands to remove pathogenic parasites and fecal coliforms from wastewater in Dar es Salaam and Iringa, Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Science 48 (1), 185-195.

Zhang H, Xiaochang C, Wang XC, Zheng Y, Dzakpasu M. 2023. Removal of pharmaceutical active compounds in wastewater by constructed wetlands: Performance and mechanisms. Journal of Environmental Management 325, A116478. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116478.

Submit Manuscript