Efficacy of combined beneficial micro-organisms in the vegetative growth of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) variety phil 2006-2289 with reduced recommended nitrogen
Paper Details
Efficacy of combined beneficial micro-organisms in the vegetative growth of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) variety phil 2006-2289 with reduced recommended nitrogen
Abstract
This study investigates the use of beneficial microorganisms, specifically Acetobacter and Azospirillum, as a sustainable alternative to synthetic nitrogen fertilizers in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) production in Piat, Cagayan. Due to the environmental and economic challenges associated with excessive nitrogen fertilizer use, this research aimed to assess the impact of these microorganisms on sugarcane growth while reducing reliance on synthetic nitrogen. The study was conducted using a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four treatments, including a control and three levels of nitrogen application (100%, 50%, and 25%) combined with beneficial microorganisms. Key growth parameters, including plant height, number of millable tillers, stalk diameter, and leaf color intensity, were measured. Results showed that the application of beneficial microorganisms significantly enhanced sugarcane growth, with reduced nitrogen inputs (up to 50%) still yielding comparable or even superior results in plant height and number of millable tillers compared to the control. These findings suggest that Acetobacter and Azospirillum can effectively improve sugarcane productivity while reducing the environmental impacts of excessive nitrogen fertilizer use. The study recommends the adoption of microbial inoculants as part of sustainable fertilizer management practices in sugarcane farming
Aloo BN, Makumba BA, Mbega ER. 2019. The potential of Bacilli rhizobacteria for sustainable crop production and environmental sustainability. Microbiol. Res. 219, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.10.011
Anand R, Grayston S, Chanway C. 2013. N-2-fixation and seedling growth promotion of lodgepole pine by endophytic Paenibacillus polymyxa. Microb. Ecol. 66, 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-013-0196-1
Bashan Y, de-Bashan LE, Prabhu SR, Hernandez JP. 2014. Advances in plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculant technology: Formulations and practical perspectives. Biology and Fertility of Soils 50(5), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-014-0892-7
Bhardwaj D, Arora N, Kharwar RN. 2014. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Mechanisms and applications. In: Glick AA (Ed.), PGPR: Biocontrol and biofertilization, 119–141. Springer.
Caione G, Lange A, Benett CG. 2015. Soil fertility and sugarcane production. African Journal of Agricultural Research 10(5), 391–397.
Calvo P, Nelson L, Kloepper JW. 2014. Agricultural uses of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: Applications and perspectives. In: Bork DJH (Ed.), Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in sustainable agriculture, 1–16. Springer.
Chanway CP. 2018. Endophytes: Colonization, behavior, and their role in plant development. Microorganisms 6(2), 43.
Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Clément C, Barka EA. 2009. Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: Principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75(15), 4951–4959. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02722-08
Du Jardin P. 2015. The science of plant growth promoters: Natural and applied aspects. Trends in Plant Science 20(1), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.12.004
Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Zaks DPM. 2011. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478(7369), 337–342.https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452
Giller KE, Cadisch G. 1995. Nitrogen fixation and plant growth: Role of symbiotic and free-living bacteria in improving plant nutrition. Field Crops Research 47(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(95)00003-Y
Glick BR. 2012. Plant growth-promoting bacteria: Mechanisms and applications. Science Progress 95(4), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.3184/003685012X13467498602004
Gontia-Mishra I, Yadav RS, Singh A. 2015. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: Sustainable agriculture and environmental perspectives. Environmental Sustainability 1(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-015-0005-5
Gopalakrishnan S, Sathya A, Vijayabharathi R, Srinivas V, Vidya MS. 2017. Plant growth-promoting rhizobia: Challenges and opportunities. 3 Biotech 7, 253.
Huang WY, Cai YZ, Hyde KD, Corke H, Sun M. 2012. Role of microbial inoculants in sustainable agriculture. Agricultural Sciences 3(5), 733–739. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2012.35089
Joshi R, Rao A, Bhagat D. 2020. Sustainable agriculture and plant health: Role of nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Nature Sustainability 4(9), 1689–1696. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41599-020-00658-x
Kumar A, Prakash A, Johri BN. 2017. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Current and future prospects for development of sustainable agriculture. Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology 9, 109–119.
Kumar V, Singh V, Singh D. 2019. Effect of PSB inoculation on sugarcane growth. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 8(2), 541–544.
Ladha JK, Henry S, Jaiswal D. 2016. The role of nitrogen-fixing bacteria in sustainable agriculture. Agricultural Systems 146, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.04.001
Lal R. 2012. Sustainable intensification of food production on upland and degraded soils in the tropics. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 36(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2011.620230
Mancuso S, Marras F. 2013. Biological nitrogen fixation and its role in plant productivity. The Botanical Review 79(4), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-013-9127-7
Marschner P, Rengel Z. 2012. Nutrient uptake in crops: Biological nitrogen fixation in leguminous plants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 65, 17–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.004
Meena VS, Maurya BR, Verma JP, Meena RS. 2017. The role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in sustainable agriculture. In: Advances in PGPR for Sustainable Agriculture, Springer, 1–36.
Mendes R, Pizzirani-Kleiner AA, Araújo WL, Raaijmakers JM. 2007. Diversity of cultivated endophytic bacteria from sugarcane: genetic and biochemical characterization of Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73(22), 7259–7267. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01222-07
Muthukumar T, Munn SD. 2018. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and their role in improving plant health. Plant Growth Regulation 58(5), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-018-0151-7
Muthukumarasamy R, Revathi G, Lakshminarasimhan C. 2014. Acetobacter diazotrophicus: Diversity and beneficial traits. Plant and Soil 245, 123–134.
Perez-Montano F, Alías-Villegas C, Bellogín RA, Del Cerro P, Espuny MR, Jiménez-Guerrero I, Ollero FJ. 2014. Plant growth promotion in cereal and leguminous agricultural important plants: From microorganism capacities to crop production. Microbiological Research 169(5–6), 325–336.
Pettit TF, Long TD. 2017. Microbial interactions and soil health in agriculture. Soil Science 32(3), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11210-017-0589-x
Pramanik P, Bera S, Ghosh P. 2018. Influence of Azospirillum inoculation on sugarcane seed germination and early growth. Sugar Tech 20, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-017-0556-5
Raaijmakers JM, Muthumeen T. 2008. Microbial suppression of plant diseases in agricultural ecosystems. Plant Disease 35(8), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDI-12-10-0045
Rana MR, Tripathi P, Maiti S. 2019. Nitrogen and chlorophyll synthesis in plants: Their relation and function in improving plant growth. Plant Physiology 62(6), 872–878. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.62.6.872
Reed SC, Cleveland CC, Townsend AR. 2011. Functional ecology of free-living nitrogen fixation: A contemporary perspective. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 42, 489–512.
Reis VM, Dobereiner J. 1998. Effect of nitrogen-fixing Acetobacter diazotrophicus on sugarcane growth. Biology and Fertility of Soils 26, 201–205.
Ruschel AP. 1981. Biological nitrogen fixation in sugarcane. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 16(suppl.), 131–136.
Shankariah C, Hunsigi G. 2001. Influence of Azospirillum inoculation on cane yield in sugarcane. Sugar Tech 3(1–2), 25–28.
Smith JA, White DR. 2019. Environmental impacts of nitrogen fertilizers and strategies for minimizing damage in agriculture. Soil and Environmental Sustainability 55(3), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilen.2019.02.008
Tabassum B, Khan A, Tariq M, Ramzan M, Iqbal M, Yaseen T. 2017. Bottlenecks in commercialization and future prospects of PGPR. Frontiers in Microbiology 8, 2473.
Tilman D, Fargione G. 2002. A global perspective on agricultural land use and its impact on the environment. Nature 419(6909), 369–373. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01014
Wood RA. 1990. The agronomy of the sugarcane crop. In: Heinz DJ (Ed.), Sugarcane Improvement Through Breeding, 231–281. Elsevier.
Angelie Kate Baliuag-Caluducan, Nonito Pattugalan (2025), Efficacy of combined beneficial micro-organisms in the vegetative growth of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) variety phil 2006-2289 with reduced recommended nitrogen; IJAAR, V26, N5, May, P113-121
https://innspub.net/efficacy-of-combined-beneficial-micro-organisms-in-the-vegetative-growth-of-sugarcane-saccharum-officinarum-variety-phil-2006-2289-with-reduced-recommended-nitrogen/
Copyright © 2025
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0