Faculty achievements amplifier platform: A data-secure solution for enhancing faculty recognition within higher education institutions
Paper Details
Faculty achievements amplifier platform: A data-secure solution for enhancing faculty recognition within higher education institutions
Abstract
Recognizing faculty achievements in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) fosters an environment of innovation and excellence. This study focuses on developing the Faculty Achievements Amplifier Platform for State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) in the Philippines, emphasizing data security and user-friendly design to promote faculty recognition and collaboration. The study employed a developmental research methodology to design and develop the platform. It then utilized a descriptive research approach to assess its adherence to ISO/IEC 25010 standards and evaluate its acceptability based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. Findings indicate the platform’s strong adherence to ISO standards, demonstrating high software quality and meeting user expectations. It also received positive acceptance across UTAUT constructs, suggesting its effectiveness in enhancing faculty recognition and collaboration. The study concludes that the platform meets high-quality standards and enjoys broad user acceptability. Recommendations include regular updates based on user feedback and integrating advanced features to support academic innovation and recognition further. This study highlights the transformative potential of secure, user-friendly digital platforms in educational settings.
Ab Hamid SH, Husin WHW, Nasir MHNM. 2007. The design of text to use case diagram tool. T2 Software Design and Development 1.
Benito Á, Scott-Milligan F. 2018. Hearing the voice of faculty: Global recommendations for faculty recognition in higher education institutions. Higher Learning Research Communications.
Bodner D, Murphy C. 2012. Honoring excellence. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 35(3), 131–131.
Bonnema GM. 2010. Insight, innovation, and the big picture in system design. Systems Engineering 14(3), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20174
Brennan DD. 2015. Creating a climate for achievement. Educational Leadership 72(5), 56–59.
Chikungwa T, Chamisa SF. 2013. An evaluation of recognition on performance as a motivator: A case of Eastern Cape higher education institution. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 4(14), 219.
Ching MRD, Fabito BS, Celis NJ. 2018. Data privacy act of 2012: A case study approach to Philippine government agencies compliance. Advanced Science Letters 24(10), 7042–7046.
Dolai B, Shenmare SJ. 2022. Considering user feedback and consistency, analysis of the level of user satisfaction with particular reference to MIMER Medical College, Pune. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 4(1), 22–35.
Gears DA, Goldberger A. 2015. Motivative computing: An interdisciplinary analysis and design framework.
Gopalakrishnan S, Krogstie J, Sindre G. 2011. Extending use and misuse case diagrams to capture multi-channel information systems. In: Informatics Engineering and Information Science: International Conference, ICIEIS 2011, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, November 12–14, 2011. Proceedings, Part I, 355–369. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Heffron JKC. 2014. The Philippine Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012: To protect or destroy. DLSU Business and Economics Review 24(1), 96–103.
Imtiaz S. 2018. The studies of a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in an M-commerce context. International Journal of Information Communication Technology and Digital Convergence 3(1), 42–56.
Kovács A, Szabados K. 2013. Test software quality issues and connections to international standards. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Informatica 5(1), 77–102.
Lescevica M, Ginters E, Mazza R. 2013. Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) for market analysis of FP7 CHOReOS products. Procedia Computer Science 26, 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.12.007
McNamara NB, Kirakowski J. 2011. Measuring user satisfaction with electronic consumer products: The Consumer Products Questionnaire. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69, 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.02.002
Mngomezulu N, Challenor M, Munapo E, Mashau P, Chikandiwa C. 2015. The impact of recognition on retention of good talent in the workforce. Journal of Governance and Regulation 4(4), 372–379.
Mohamed NRW, Sharif D, Muhayiddin MN. 2021. Literature review on technology acceptance model: The enhanced variables of Venkatesh’s UTAUT model on students’ acceptance of online distance learning. AIP Conference Proceedings 2347(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0052701
Riley TD, Radico JA, Parascando JA, Berg A, Oser TK. 2022. Challenges in effective faculty and provider recognition to enhance engagement. Family Medicine 54(6), 461–465.
Safin K, Kiner R. 2020. Campus engagement: Faculty recognition and the library’s role. Journal of Library Outreach and Engagement 1(1), 1–5.
Sahl A. 2017. The importance of faculty appreciation and recognition: A case study of one institution. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations 39, 246–259.
Sedanza NC. 2018. Research and extension participation, performance and motivation of the Leyte Normal University faculty: Input to policy redirection. International Journal of Research- Granthaalayah.
Seidl M, Scholz M, Huemer C, Kappel G, Seidl M. 2015. The use case diagram. In: Kappel G, Seidl M (eds.), UML@ Classroom: An introduction to object-oriented modeling, 23–47.
Tridandapani S, Meltzer CC. 2013. A faculty awards program in an academic radiology department: How we do it. Journal of the American College of Radiology 10(7), 548–550.
Urera FL Jr, Balahadia F. 2019. ICTeachMUPO: An evaluation of information e-learning module system for faculty and students. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research 3(1), 163–188. https://doi.org/10.25147/ijcsr.2019.001.1.14
Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425–478.
White KP. 1998. Systems design engineering. Systems Engineering 1(4), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6858(1998)1:4<285::aid-sys4>3.0.co;2-e
Jean Richel B. Santander, 2025. Faculty achievements amplifier platform: A data-secure solution for enhancing faculty recognition within higher education institutions. Int. J. Biosci., 27(2), 17-28.
Copyright © 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article and distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license.