Yield performance assessment of different mustard cultivars under field conditions

Paper Details

Research Paper 24/08/2025
Views (464)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Yield performance assessment of different mustard cultivars under field conditions

Md. Khan Jahan Ali, Md. Moshiur Rahman, Kamrun Nahar, Sharmin Ara Jannat, Mst. Khadija Khatun, Sushan Chowhan, Md. Habibur Rahman
Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 264-269, August 2025.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2025; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Mustard (Brassica spp.) is a vital oilseed crop in Bangladesh, significantly contributing to domestic edible oil production and the rural economy. This study was conducted at the BINA Sub-station Farm, Ishurdi, Pabna during the 2023–24 at rabi season to evaluate the yield performance and agronomic variability of five mustard cultivars—Binasarisha-4, Binasarisha-9, Binasarisha-11, BARI Sarisha-14, and BARI Sarisha-17. The experiment followed a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. Key traits including plant height, branching, siliqua number, seed characteristics, and yield were measured and analyzed through ANOVA. Significant differences were observed among cultivars, indicating substantial genetic variability. Binasarisha-9 demonstrated superior performance in plant height, number of siliqua per plant, seeds per siliqua, and seed yield (1.86 t/ha), followed by BARI Sarisha-17 and Binasarisha-4. Conversely, Binasarisha-11 and BARI Sarisha-14 exhibited lower yields despite high primary branching, likely due to poor siliqua development. These results underline the importance of genotype selection in enhancing mustard productivity and recommend Binasarisha-9, Binasarisha-4, and BARI Sarisha-17 for cultivation in the target agro-climatic zone. The findings contribute to ongoing efforts to improve mustard yield and support food security through strategic varietal selection.

Abrol DP. 2024. Pollination biology of cultivated oil seeds and pulse crops. CRC Press.

Aziz MA, Chakma R, Ahmed M, Rahman AKMM, Roy K. 2011. Effect of sowing dates on the growth, development and yield of mustard in the hilly areas. Journal of Experiment Bioscience 2(1), 33–36.

Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley & Sons.

Islam MR, Alam MA, Kamal MM, Zaman R, Hossain A, Alharby H, Bamagoos A, Farooq M, Hossain J, Barutcular C, Çig F, El Sabagh A. 2019. Assessing impact of thermal units on growth and development of mustard varieties grown under optimum sown conditions. Journal of Agrometeorology 21(3), 270–281.

Kumar R, Kaur R, Kaur L. 2019. Genetic variation for yield traits of F1 hybrids in Indian mustard (B. juncea). Journal of Oilseed Brassica.

Kumar Y, Singh R, Singh D, Kumar A, Dhaka AK. 2017. Influence of weather parameters on yield and yield attributes of mustard (Brassica juncea) at Hisar condition. Environment and Ecology 35(2), 1274–1280.

Meena HO, Meena PKP, Singh K, Meena HP, Meena D. 2020. Genetic divergence analysis in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss.]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 9(10), 2185–2192.https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.910.265

Nazeri P, Shirani Rad AH, ValadAbadi SA, Mirakhori M, Hadidi Masoule E. 2018. Effect of sowing dates and late season water deficit stress on quantitative and qualitative traits of canola cultivars. Outlook on Agriculture 47(4), 291–297.

Pandey M, Srivastava AK, D’Souza SF, Penna S. 2013. Thiourea, a ROS scavenger, regulates source-to-sink relationship to enhance crop yield and oil content in Brassica juncea (L.). PLOS ONE 8(9), e73921. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073921

Rahman MA, Saha I, Roy AC. 2024. Role of credit on mustard production and food security in a selected area of Sirajganj District in Bangladesh. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science 9(1), 49–57.

Rahman MM. 2002. Status of oil seeds and future prospects in Bangladesh. Paper presented at a review workshop on the impact of technology transfer on oil crops, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, April 29, 2002.

Rahman S, Kazal MMH. 2016. Profitability, input demand and output supply of mustard production in Bangladesh. Journal of Oilseeds Research 33(1).https://doi.org/10.56739/jor.v33i1.139029

Rana K, Singh JP, Parihar M. 2019. Manifestation of improved cultivars, irrigation and sulphur in mustard growth, productivity, quality and profitability: A review. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 8(3), 2778–2782.

Singh L, Sharma D, Parmar N, Singh KH, Jain R, Rai PK, Thakur AK. 2020. Genetic diversity studies in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss) using molecular markers. In: Brassica improvement: Molecular, genetics and genomic perspectives, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 215–244.

Singh S, Kumar V, Singh SK, Daneva V. 2022. Genetic variability, interrelation and path analysis for yield & yield characters in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Journal of Oilseed Brassica 13(2), 112–118.

Tripathi KBM, Gaur T, Pandey L, Singh A, Tiwari A, Prakash V, Singh RK. 2021. Effect of sowing dates on growth and yield of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 10(1), 3046–3057.

Yadav BS, Sharma HK, Yadav AP, Ram B. 2021. Correlation and path analysis in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) for seed yield and attributing traits. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 10(2), 1761–1768. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2021.1002.208

Related Articles

Anti-proliferative potential of seed derived proteins from Vitis vinifera and Mangifera indica

Hareeshthulasi, V. Vinotha, R. Rajakumar*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 129-137, April 2026.

Valorisation of table waste and fruit waste by black soldiers (Ullicens hermetica)

Ayaba Adéline Hounnou, Vanessa Chabi, Jomini Marc Sène Alitonou, Franck Sokenou, Mickael Vitus Martin Kpessou Saïzonou, Fidèle Paul Tchobo, Guy Alain Alitonou*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 123-128, April 2026.

Murraya koenigii (Linn.) Spreng.: An opulent source of fatty acid

Shahin Aziz*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 116-122, April 2026.

Design and architecture of an IoT-enabled bamboo resource management system: Data-driven approach for sustainable agriculture

Charlot L. Maramag*, Dorothy M. Ayuyang, Richard R. Ayuyang, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 107-115, April 2026.

Physicochemical and microbiological characterization of flours from the local variety of purple corn (Zea mays L.) produced and marketed in Katiola (Côte d’Ivoire)

Moumouny Traore*, N´Zebo Desiré Kouame, Pepiesin Marie Ange Melem Soro, Zamblé Bi Irié Abel Boli, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 98-106, April 2026.

In the shadows of governance: Exploring youth participation in local peacebuilding initiatives

Juramie R. Rubia, Benny R. Rubia, Nancy E. Aranjuez*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 85-97, April 2026.

Evaluation of the agronomic performance, beta-carotene content and dry matter content of 228 sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) genotypes in Burkina Faso

Nattan Gamsore*, Koussao Some, Djakaridja Tiama, Pauline Bationo_Kando, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 73-84, April 2026.

Geomatics tools for agricultural and farm disaster risk management and reduction: A survey of farmers in South-South coastal communities, Nigeria

G. O. Nwodo, O. J. Ugwu, E. U. Onah, A. Ugwuoti, E. Elijah Ebinne*, O. P. Nogheghase, S. I. Ogbaa, U. E. Ahuchaogu, T. O. Ogbuji, C. P. Owuamalam-Chidi, C. O. Osuagwu, M. O. Igwenagu, O. E. Mbakaogu, J. U. Chikaire, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 59-72, April 2026.