Protective effects of exogenous L-proline on germination and early seedling development of soybean under osmotic stress
Paper Details
Protective effects of exogenous L-proline on germination and early seedling development of soybean under osmotic stress
Abstract
Salinity is a major abiotic stress limiting soybean germination and seedling establishment by impairing water uptake, metabolism, and early growth. Exogenous application of L-proline has emerged as a potential strategy to improve plant tolerance to saline conditions. Soybean seeds (GH 5933 IPRO) were treated with four concentrations of L-proline (0, 0.04, 0.08, and 0.12 g kg⁻¹ seed) and subjected to four osmotic potentials (0.0, −0.3, −0.6, and −0.9 MPa) induced by NaCl. Germination, seed vigor, seedling growth, and dry matter accumulation were evaluated in a completely randomized factorial design. Salinity significantly reduced seed vigor from approximately 92% under non-saline conditions to about 45% at −0.9 MPa, while the percentage of normal seedlings declined from approximately 95% to 47%. Application of 0.12 g kg⁻¹ L-proline increased seed vigor under severe stress to approximately 74% and improved the percentage of normal seedlings to about 75%, compared with untreated seeds. The proportion of hard and dead seeds under severe salinity decreased from approximately 50% in untreated seeds to about 17% following L-proline treatment. Root length increased from 3.6 to 4.5 cm, whereas shoot length increased from 1.9 to 2.4 cm with increasing L-proline concentration. Dry matter accumulation also increased, reaching approximately 0.31 g seedling⁻¹ at the highest L-proline dose under non-saline conditions, while biomass losses under saline stress were partially alleviated. These findings demonstrate that exogenous L-proline enhances osmotic adjustment, improves germination and seedling vigor, stimulates early growth, and reduces seed mortality under salt stress, highlighting its potential as a sustainable strategy for improving soybean establishment in saline environments.
Ayub MA, Ahmad HR, Ali M, Rizwan M, Ali S, Rehman MZ, Waris AA. 2020. Salinity and tolerance strategies in plants. In: Tripathi DK, Chauhan DK, Prasad SM, Ramawat N, Singh VP, Sharma S, Dubey NK (eds). Plant Life Under Changing Environmental Conditions. Amsterdam: Academic Press. pp. 47–76.
Biancucci M, Mattioli R, Moubayidin L, Sabatini S, Costantino P, Trovato M. 2015. Proline affects the size of the root meristematic zone in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biology 15, 1–14.
Braccini AL, Ruiz HA, Braccini MCL, Reis MS. 1996. Germinação e vigor de sementes de soja sob estresse hídrico induzido por soluções de cloreto de sódio, manitol e polietilenoglicol. Revista Brasileira de Sementes 18, 10–16.
Brasil (Ministério da Agricultura). 2009. Regras para análise de sementes. Brasília: Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. 399 p.
CONAB (Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento). 2025. Acompanhamento da Safra Brasileira de Grãos – Safra 2024/2025 – Oitavo Levantamento, Maio 2025. Brasília: Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. 119 p.
Farissi M, Ghoulam C, Bouizgaren A. 2013. Changes in water deficit saturation and photosynthetic pigments of alfalfa populations under salinity and assessment of proline role in salt tolerance. Agricultural Science Research Journals 3, 29–35.
Golden Harvest. 2025. GH 5933 IPRO: Cultivar de soja.
Hartman GL, West ED, Herman TK. 2011. Crops that feed the world 2. Soybean—worldwide production, use, and constraints caused by pathogens and pests. Food Security 3, 5–17.
Hasanuzzaman M, Bhuyan MHMB, Nahar K, Hossain MS, Mahmud JA, Hossen MS, Masud AAC, Moumita, Fujita M. 2018. Potassium: A vital regulator of plant responses and tolerance to abiotic stresses. Agronomy 10, 684.
Hosseinifard M, Stefaniak S, Javid MG, Soltani E, Wojtyla L, Garnczarska M. 2022. Contribution of exogenous proline to abiotic stress tolerance in plants: A review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, 5186.
Hubbard M, Germida J, Vujanovic V. 2012. Fungal endophytes improve wheat seed germination under heat and drought stress. Botany 90, 137–149.
IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). 2025. Indicadores IBGE: Levantamento Sistemático da Produção Agrícola. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. 111 p.
Kishor PBK, Sreenivasulu N. 2014. Is proline accumulation per se correlated with stress tolerance or is proline homeostasis a more critical issue? Plant, Cell & Environment 37, 300–311.
Liang X, Zhang L, Natarajan SK, Becker DF. 2013. Proline mechanisms of stress survival. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 19, 998–1011.
Marcos Filho J. 2015. Fisiologia de sementes de plantas cultivadas. Londrina: ABRATES. 659 p.
Mariano-Da-Silva S, Ducatti RDB, Radünz AL, Tironi SP, Smaniotto V. 2025a. L-tryptophan improves germination and early growth of Glycine max seedlings subjected to cold test. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology 10, 89–94.
Mariano-Da-Silva S, Smaniotto V, Ducatti RDB, Radünz AL, Tironi SP. 2025b. Exogenous L-tryptophan improves seed germination and aging tolerance in Glycine max (L.) Merrill. International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research 11, 1352–1364.
Medina IR, Rocha GH, Pereira EG. 2023. Photosynthetic adjustments and proline concentration are probably linked to stress memory in soybean exposed to recurrent drought. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 47, e015322.
Moukhtari AE, Cabassa-Hourton C, Farissi M, Savouré A. 2020. How does proline treatment promote salt stress tolerance during crop plant development? Frontiers in Plant Science 11, 1127.
Murillo-Amador B, Lopes-Aguilar R, Kaya C, Larrinaga-Mayoral J, Flores-Hernandez A. 2002. Comparative effects of NaCl and polyethylene glycol on germination, emergence and seedling growth of cowpea. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 188, 235–247.
Pimentel-Gomes F. 2000. Curso de estatística experimental. 14th ed. Piracicaba: Livroceres. 480 p.
Sá ME, Oliveira SA, Bertolin DC. 2011. Roteiro prático da disciplina de produção e tecnologia de sementes: Análise da qualidade de sementes. São Paulo: Universidade Estadual Paulista. 112 p.
Sharma S, Villamor JG, Verslues PE. 2011. Essential role of tissue-specific proline synthesis and catabolism in growth and redox balance at low water potential. Plant Physiology 157, 292–304.
Signorelli S. 2016. The fermentation analogy: A point of view for understanding the intriguing role of proline accumulation in stressed plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 7, 1339. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01339
Souza GS. 1998. Introdução aos modelos de regressão linear e não linear. Brasília: Embrapa SEA. 505 p.
Szabados L, Savouré A. 2010. Proline: A multifunctional amino acid. Trends in Plant Science 15, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.009
Teixeira WF, Soares LH, Fagan EB, Mello SC, Reichardt K, Dourado-Neto D. 2019. Amino acids as stress reducers in soybean plant growth under different water-deficit conditions. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 39, 905–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-10056-x
Trovato M, Forlani G, Signorelli S, Funck D. 2019. Proline metabolism and its functions in development and stress tolerance. In: Hossain M, Kumar V, Burritt D, Fujita M, Mäkelä P (eds). Osmoprotectant-Mediated Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. Cham: Springer. pp. 41–72.
Verslues PE, Sharma S. 2010. Proline metabolism and its implications for plant-environment interaction. The Arabidopsis Book 8, e0140. https://doi.org/10.1199/tab.0140
Zhang H, Zhu J, Gong Z, Zhu JK. 2022. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nature Reviews Genetics 23, 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-021-00413-0
Zhou XY, Li XM, Tian YM, Qu ZP, Wu ZH, Wang XY, Dong SK. 2023. Regulation of proline metabolism in soybean leaves under drought stress at seedling phase. Legume Research 46, 735–7400. https://doi.org/10.18805/LRF-756
Samuel Mariano-da-Silva, Rafael Dal Bosco Ducatti*, André Luiz Radünz, Marco Aurélio Tamontin, Siumar Pedro Tironi, Vanderlei Smaniotto, 2026. Protective effects of exogenous L-proline on germination and early seedling development of soybean under osmotic stress. Int. J. Agron. Agric. Res., 28(6), 1-8.
Copyright © 2026 by the Authors. This article is an open access article and distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license.