Composition of milk- A comparative analysis between indigenous and cross breed cows of Ganjam

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2020
Views (656)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Composition of milk- A comparative analysis between indigenous and cross breed cows of Ganjam

Puspanjali Maharana, Gitanjali Mishra
Int. J. Biosci. 17(1), 216-215, July 2020.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2020; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The study was carried out in Berhampur city of Ganjam District from 03.10.2018 to 02.12.2018 to estimate the composition of milk in Cross breed and Indigenous breed cows. Twenty dairy cows with a standard body weight between 250 kg to 350 kg, 3rd to 7th lactation period and 5-7 years of age were taken for the study. Total Protein was determined by Nano spectrophotometer, Total Carbohydrates were determined by anthrone techniques, Acidity were determined by IS: 1479-1 (1960) and total casein was determined by Acid precipitation. Concerning the milk components, Cross Breed groups shows a significant variation (P< 0.05) attributed to type of feed and breed. The statistical analysis showed a significant increase (P<0.05) in protein, ASH and SNF percentage as compare to Indigenous breed. Total solid and Moisture of IB and CB groups has Non-significant increase (P< 0.5) in Cross Breed as compare to Indigenous breed. Fat content shows a Non-significant increase (P< 0.5) in cross breed cows than the Indigenous breed cows. Acidity% found highly significant (P<0.0001) in both breed of cows. Lactose content found a Non-significant increase in indigenous breed cows as compare to the cross breed cows (P<0.5). Lactometer reading shows significant increase (P<0.01) in Cross breed group of cows as compare to Indigenous breed cows. Specific Gravity found a Non-significant increase (P<0.1) in cross breed cows. Total Casein content found highly significant in cross breed cows (P<0.001).

Ageeb AG, Hayes JF. 2000. Genetic and environmental effects on the productivity of Holstein Friesian cattle to the climatic conditions of central Sudan. Trop. Anim. Health Prod 32, 33-49.

AOAC. 2000. Association of analytical chemist. Official methods of analysis, 1-24

Butler G, Stergiadis S, Chatzidimitriou E, Franceschin E,  Davis HR, Leifert C, Håvard Steinshamn H. 2019. Differing responses in milk composition from introducing rapeseed and naked oats to conventional and organic dairy diets. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 8115. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44567-8

Castillo AR. 2007. Improving nitrogen utilization on dairy cows. M.sc thesis, University of Reading (UK).

Castle H, Watkin J. 1979. Compositional on Milk and study of its different enzymes 11, 1215-1218.

Dandare SU, Ezeonwumelu LJ, Abubakar MG. 2014. Comparative analysis of nutrient composition of milk from different breeds of cows. ISSN:2278-0041. European Journal of Applied Engineering and Scientific Research 3(2), 33-36.

Darwish S. 2009. Factors Affecting milk production Agricultural Report-www.reefnet.gov

Eckles CH, Combs WB and Macy H. 1957. Milk and milk products. 4th Edn. McGraw Hill Book Company, Inc., NY, USA, pt 12, 988-112.

Guetouache M, Guessas B, Medjekal S. 2014. Composition and Nutritional value of raw milk, ISSN 2350-1588.Biological Sciences and Pharmaceutical Research Vol. (2), pp. 115-122.

Jones AC, King GJG, Fennell H, Stone D. 1957. Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth. Lab. Serv pp. 16, 109.

Kanwal R, Ahmed P and Mirza B. 2004. Comparative analysis of quality of milk collected from Buffalo, Cow, Goat and Sheep of Ralwalpindi/Islambad region in Pakistan. Asian Journal of Plant science, 3 (3): 300-305.

Kennedy J, Dillon P, Delaby L, Faverdin P, Stakelum G, Rath M. 2003. Effect of genetic merit and concentrate supplementation on grass intake and milk production with Holstein Friesian Dairy cows. Journal of Dairy science 86(2), 610-621.

Kohler G. 2013. Note d’information relative à la ventedirecte de lait cru. Projet des Pyrénées. Atlantiques: pp. 1-4.

Konte M. 1999. Le laitet les produitslaitiers. Développement de systèmes de productions intensives en Afrique de l’ouest. Université de Nouakchott (R.I.M) Faculté des Sciences et Technologies des aliments, B. P. 5026. ISRA/URV – LNERV/FEVRIER: 2-25.

Marphes AM. 1964. Milk Production. Ecosystem of the World Billiton 17(86), 101-112.

Palmquist DL, Denise Beaulieu A, Barbano DM. 1993. Feed and animal factors influencing milk fat composition. Feed and Animal factors influencing milk fat composition journal of dairy science 76(6), 1753-1771.

Roadhouse CL, Henderson JL. 1950. The Market Milk Industry. 2nd Edn., Magraw Hill Brok Co., New York pp: 41-42.

Schmidst G,H., Robinson, R.K. and Kenneth, R, 1988. Food microbiology/dairy products.  Principles of Dairy Science, Second Edition.

Related Articles

Sensory acceptability of gnocchi pasta added with different levels of malunggay (Moringa oleifera) leaves and blue ternate (Clitoria ternatea) flowers

Ralph Justyne B. Bague, James Troyo, Proceso C. Valleser Jr.*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 103-114, January 2026.

Spatio-temporal analysis of vegetation cover and socio-environmental implications in Korhogo (Northern Côte d’Ivoire) from 1990-2020

Adechina Olayossimi*, Konan Kouassi Urbain, Ouattara Amidou, Yao-Kouamé Albert, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 94-102, January 2026.

Predicting the habitat suitability of Vitellaria paradoxa under climate change scenarios

Franck Placide Junior Pagny*, Anthelme Gnagbo, Dofoungo Kone, Blaise Kabré, Marie-Solange Tiébré6,, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 73-83, January 2026.

Performance response dynamics of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) to locally sourced, on-farm feed ingredients during the growing phase: Implications for the institutional rabbit multiplier project

Roel T. Calagui*, Janelle G. Cadiguin, Maricel F. Campańano, Jhaysel G. Rumbaoa, Louis Voltaire A. Pagalilauan, Mary Ann M. Santos, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 65-72, January 2026.

Chronopharmacology: Integration of circadian biology in modern pharmacotherapy

Sangram D. Chikane*, Vishal S. Adak, Shrikant R. Borate, Rajkumar V. Shete, Deepak V. Fajage, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 56-64, January 2026.

Evaluation of the impact of floristic diversity on the productivity of cocoa-based agroforestry systems in the new cocoa production area: The case of the Biankouma department (Western Côte d’Ivoire)

N'gouran Kobenan Pierre, Zanh Golou Gizele*, Kouadio Kayeli Anaïs Laurence, Kouakou Akoua Tamia Madeleine, N'gou Kessi Abel, Barima Yao Sadaiou Sabas, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 44-55, January 2026.

Utilization of locally sourced feed ingredients and their influence on the growth performance of broiler chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus): A study in support of the school’s chicken multiplier project

Roel T. Calagui*, Maricel F. Campańano, Joe Hmer Kyle T. Acorda, Louis Voltaire A. Pagalilauan, Mary Ann M. Santos, Jojo D. Cauilan, John Michael U. Tabil, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 35-43, January 2026.