A comparative analysis of phosphorus fertilizer regimes on seed production of Lablab in East and Central Africa

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2011
Views (257) Download (9)

A comparative analysis of phosphorus fertilizer regimes on seed production of Lablab in East and Central Africa

Mugerwa Swidiq, Sara Babiker, Habonayo Glorios, Nijimbere Aloys, Kayiwa Stephen, Zziwa Emmanuel, Njarui Donald
Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.1( 2), 20-27, December 2011.
Certificate: IJAAR 2011 [Generate Certificate]


Lablab purpureus is an important forage legume in smallholder crop-livestock systems of East and Central Africa. Seed yields of L. purpureus are generally low owing to limited phosphorus levels in most soils. Amendment of soil with phosphorus fertilizers is thus critical in enhancing lablab seed production. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of varying levels of Phosphorus fertilizers on seed yields and the resulting net benefits associated with each level. The paper examines results from three studies conducted in Uganda (treatments: 0, 15, 30, 40, 60, 80 and 100 kgP205 ha-1), Sudan (treatments: 0, 94 and 188 kg SSP/ha) and Burundi (treatments: 0, 20, 40, 60 and 80 kgDAP/ha). Generally, amendment of soil with P enhanced seed yield by 27, 18.4 and 4% in Uganda, Burundi and Sudan respectively. The highest increments in seed yield of 40, 27 and 5.3% were obtained at 30 kgP2O5, 60 kgDAP and 188 kgSSP Uganda, Burundi and Sudan respectively. Results from dominance analysis indicated that treatments 80 and 100 kgha-1 were dominated and their net benefits were lower than that of the control. In Uganda, marginal analysis showed that the marginal rate of return (MRR) from 0 to 15 and 30 kgP2O5 was 500 and 700% respectively, while moving from 15 to 30 kgP2O5 resulted into a MRR of 274%. The study concluded that the rate of 30kg P205ha-1 was the most economically viable rate for seed production in Uganda.


Berg RK, Lynd JQ. 1985. Soil fertility effects on growth, yield, nodulation and nitrogenase activity of Austrian winter pea. J. Plant Nutr. 8, 131—145.

Bolland DA, Riethmuller GP, Siddique HM, Loss SP. 2001. Methods of phosphorus application and row spacing on grain yield of Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 41, 227—234.

Brady CN. 1990. The nature and properties of Soils. Tenth Edition. Collier Macmillan Publishers, London. 621p.

CIMMYT. 1988. From agronomic data to farmer recommendations: An economic training manual. Completely revised edition. Mexico. D.F.

French RJ. 1990. The contribution of pod numbers to field pea (Pisum sativum L.) yields in a short growing season environment. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 41, 853—862.

Kasturikrishna S, Ahlawat PS. 1999. Growth and yield response of pea (Pisum sativum) to moisture stress, phosphorus, sulphur and zinc fertilizers. Indian J. Agron. 44, 588—596.

Maobe SN, Dyek EA, Mureithi SG. 1998. Screening of soil improving herbaceous legumes for inclusion into smallholder farming systems in Kenya. In: Soil fertility research for maize based farming systems in Malawi and Zimbabwe. Soil Fertility Network. S.R.Waddington, H.K.Murwira, J.D.T.Kumwenda, D.Hikwa and F.Tagwira (Editors). Pp 105-112.

Pacovsky RS, Bethlenfalvay GJ, Paul EA. 1986. Comparisons between P-fertilized and mycorrhizal plants. Crop Sci. 26, 151—156.

Scaaffhausen RV. 1963. Economical methods for using the legume (Dolichos lablab) for soil improvement, food and feed. Turialba 13, 172-178.

Yemane AAO, Skjelva˚ g. 2003. Effects of Fertilizer Phosphorus on Yield Traits of Dekoko (Pisum sativum var. abyssinicum) Under Field Conditions. J. Agronomy & Crop Science 189, 14—20.